<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VideoEgg, to good reviews, raises cash from August</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2006/01/18/videoegg-to-good-reviews-raises-cash-from-august/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/01/18/videoegg-to-good-reviews-raises-cash-from-august/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:19:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ssyljfyufq</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/01/18/videoegg-to-good-reviews-raises-cash-from-august/comment-page-1/#comment-343366</link>
		<dc:creator>ssyljfyufq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/vc/?p=1058#comment-343366</guid>
		<description>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! empipnoape</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! empipnoape</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christophe LANGLOIS</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/01/18/videoegg-to-good-reviews-raises-cash-from-august/comment-page-1/#comment-3086</link>
		<dc:creator>Christophe LANGLOIS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 03:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/vc/?p=1058#comment-3086</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;VideoEgg/Typepad: Business Model&lt;/strong&gt;

VideoEgg: Video Publishing Over EasyI was curious to test the new VideoEgg service provided free of charge for all Typepad users! (the video with the cats was the only one on my computer...) I found out about this service
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>VideoEgg/Typepad: Business Model</strong></p>
<p>VideoEgg: Video Publishing Over EasyI was curious to test the new VideoEgg service provided free of charge for all Typepad users! (the video with the cats was the only one on my computer&#8230;) I found out about this service</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raul Lopez</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/01/18/videoegg-to-good-reviews-raises-cash-from-august/comment-page-1/#comment-3085</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul Lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/vc/?p=1058#comment-3085</guid>
		<description>I used to check-out only two business blogs: www.siliconbeat.com and blogs.siliconvalley.com/gmsv/, both offer excellent commentary and links on start-ups.  Then last Sunday I read in the San Jose Mercury news about www.techcrunch.com and I checked it out.  This last, a very thorough blog with lots of, until now, and to me, unknown start-ups.  But then I started noticing, between www.siliconbeat.com and www.techcrunch.com, almost at the same time, first an entry about VideoEgg and then a note on Tailrank.  I understand about press releases happening at the same time and going to different people, what I found curious is that commentaries appear at almost the same time as if one editor was doing what the other editor was doing.  Obviously the news were as relevant to both blog editors unless they were the only news in their in-box.

RAUL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to check-out only two business blogs: <a href="http://www.siliconbeat.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.siliconbeat.com</a> and blogs.siliconvalley.com/gmsv/, both offer excellent commentary and links on start-ups.  Then last Sunday I read in the San Jose Mercury news about <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com</a> and I checked it out.  This last, a very thorough blog with lots of, until now, and to me, unknown start-ups.  But then I started noticing, between <a href="http://www.siliconbeat.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.siliconbeat.com</a> and <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com</a>, almost at the same time, first an entry about VideoEgg and then a note on Tailrank.  I understand about press releases happening at the same time and going to different people, what I found curious is that commentaries appear at almost the same time as if one editor was doing what the other editor was doing.  Obviously the news were as relevant to both blog editors unless they were the only news in their in-box.</p>
<p>RAUL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Marshall</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/01/18/videoegg-to-good-reviews-raises-cash-from-august/comment-page-1/#comment-3084</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/vc/?p=1058#comment-3084</guid>
		<description>As for annoyed VC, first thing I did was to ask how much August invested because they didn&#039;t give an amount. Haven&#039;t heard back. Anyone else know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for annoyed VC, first thing I did was to ask how much August invested because they didn&#8217;t give an amount. Haven&#8217;t heard back. Anyone else know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Marshall</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/01/18/videoegg-to-good-reviews-raises-cash-from-august/comment-page-1/#comment-3083</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/vc/?p=1058#comment-3083</guid>
		<description>Hey Raul, not sure what you&#039;re implying. The public relations person for VideoEgg shipped me a press release at 4:22am this morning. I woke up, saw it, and posted it. Tailrank happened when I caught up with Scoble&#039;s blog, switched over to see whether Arrington had posted something on Tailrank (b/c he is the Web 2.0 guy, and I like linking to him on that stuff) and coincidentally, he had just posted something, and so I linked to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Raul, not sure what you&#8217;re implying. The public relations person for VideoEgg shipped me a press release at 4:22am this morning. I woke up, saw it, and posted it. Tailrank happened when I caught up with Scoble&#8217;s blog, switched over to see whether Arrington had posted something on Tailrank (b/c he is the Web 2.0 guy, and I like linking to him on that stuff) and coincidentally, he had just posted something, and so I linked to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raul Lopez</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/01/18/videoegg-to-good-reviews-raises-cash-from-august/comment-page-1/#comment-3082</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul Lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/vc/?p=1058#comment-3082</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, isn&#039;t this start-up also mentioned at about the same time at TechCrunch?  Same about Tailrank... are they the same blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, isn&#8217;t this start-up also mentioned at about the same time at TechCrunch?  Same about Tailrank&#8230; are they the same blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annoyed VC</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/01/18/videoegg-to-good-reviews-raises-cash-from-august/comment-page-1/#comment-3081</link>
		<dc:creator>Annoyed VC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/vc/?p=1058#comment-3081</guid>
		<description>How much capital, Matt? Dotcoms are cheap. How much did they pay and how much did they get? That&#039;s what an investigative reporter is supposed to tell us - not PR hype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much capital, Matt? Dotcoms are cheap. How much did they pay and how much did they get? That&#8217;s what an investigative reporter is supposed to tell us &#8211; not PR hype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
