Comments on: Monday morn SV quarterback: Khosla, VC urinals, Ridgelift, Carlyle, GoogleMars, Kontiki & more

By: auto cheap insurance

auto cheap insurance — Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:10:55 +0000

By: Technology News

Technology News — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:07:29 +0000

Technology News

Includes links to related topic groupings.Grant and funding news for non profit organizations. Includes links to special reports.Features and colu…

By: Matt Marshall

Matt Marshall — Tue, 14 Mar 2006 06:02:23 +0000

On the Vinod question, I’d agree with Jon. Incentive for partners.

By: scanR blog

scanR blog — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:37:28 +0000

Nice coverage today

Today we announced our funding and a new version of the scanR service which automatically tags keywords in scanned documents. Take a look at what others are saying: Daily WirelessCamphone Scanninghttp://dailywireless.org/modules.php?name=Newsfile=artic…

By: jeff nolan

jeff nolan — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:44:44 +0000

speaking of Origami… whatever happened to that ultra-subcompact that Vulcan was developing?

By: Jon G.

Jon G. — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:37:56 +0000

It may all be “his money” but he probably has several entities such as trusts etc. that he controls. So in effect he has institutional investors but he’s the institution. No reason not to use the standard set up, particularly since it does allow him to attract people, and who *doesn’t* want carry on top of what is I’m sure a healthy paycheck?

By: Dale

Dale — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:27:51 +0000

Just curious if Khosla Ventures II (KVII)is Vinod’s own money, then where does the carry come from. One way is that Vinod is the sole limited partner in KV II and theryby a mangament fee and a carry. The only reason for this to exist is as an incentive to attract partners i.e. partners get a portion of the carry vs. just a paycheck. The thing I can understand is Does vinod need to provide incentive to attract partners? I mean wouldn’t people be glad join his group for a paycheck.

Any opinions