<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Valuations of venture-backed companies hit five-year high</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2006/06/04/valuations-of-venture-backed-companies-hit-five-year-high/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/06/04/valuations-of-venture-backed-companies-hit-five-year-high/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:47:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob-Bridgescale</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/06/04/valuations-of-venture-backed-companies-hit-five-year-high/comment-page-1/#comment-4428</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob-Bridgescale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 16:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/vc/?p=1408#comment-4428</guid>
		<description>What seems to be one of the key drivers of rising late-stage valuations is simply company maturity or, specifically, the age of the company. Evaluation of the Dow Jones VentureOne data shows that the median age of these later stage companies has also increased from 4.35 years in the year 2002 to 5.76 years in 2005. This 32 percent increase in the median age of the companies is largely driven by the lengthening time to liquidity for private venture-backed companies. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What seems to be one of the key drivers of rising late-stage valuations is simply company maturity or, specifically, the age of the company. Evaluation of the Dow Jones VentureOne data shows that the median age of these later stage companies has also increased from 4.35 years in the year 2002 to 5.76 years in 2005. This 32 percent increase in the median age of the companies is largely driven by the lengthening time to liquidity for private venture-backed companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pran Kurup</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/06/04/valuations-of-venture-backed-companies-hit-five-year-high/comment-page-1/#comment-4427</link>
		<dc:creator>Pran Kurup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/vc/?p=1408#comment-4427</guid>
		<description>Any idea on what Web 2.0 company pre-money valuations are like? Your download document does not track that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea on what Web 2.0 company pre-money valuations are like? Your download document does not track that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Marshall</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/06/04/valuations-of-venture-backed-companies-hit-five-year-high/comment-page-1/#comment-4426</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 05:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/vc/?p=1408#comment-4426</guid>
		<description>Apologies for any confusion. I&#039;d been waiting for DJ to give me the thumbs up on releasing the press release. It is now there in the post, in an update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies for any confusion. I&#8217;d been waiting for DJ to give me the thumbs up on releasing the press release. It is now there in the post, in an update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DV Henkel-Wallace</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/06/04/valuations-of-venture-backed-companies-hit-five-year-high/comment-page-1/#comment-4425</link>
		<dc:creator>DV Henkel-Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 00:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/vc/?p=1408#comment-4425</guid>
		<description>Your explanation is not clear, so it&#039;s hard to see if it supports your conclusion or not.  I suspect this valuation is due to companies taking an additional round rather than going public right now.  This would be consistent with this $18.4MM being the _median_ (not mean) value.   If so, then I agree it&#039;s not a sign of a bubble.  But on the other hand it doesn&#039;t imply that A or B stage valuations are any higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your explanation is not clear, so it&#8217;s hard to see if it supports your conclusion or not.  I suspect this valuation is due to companies taking an additional round rather than going public right now.  This would be consistent with this $18.4MM being the _median_ (not mean) value.   If so, then I agree it&#8217;s not a sign of a bubble.  But on the other hand it doesn&#8217;t imply that A or B stage valuations are any higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
