It used to be de rigueur in Silicon Valley to stay out of the way of Microsoft’s product road map • even areas Microsoft hinted they might pursue. Nowadays, venture folks more commonly ask, “What are you going to do about Google?”

The reality of the marketplace is that unless a startup builds a huge community, Google pays only around $50 million for a company (if you’re lucky) and then only if they want to jumpstart a feature by buying a startup.

At this point, Google has trounced Yahoo with consumers. Google expanded its offerings by acquiring several YAW2 (Yet Another Web 2.0) companies with no viable business models, such as wiki software producer JotSpot, Upstartle (maker of the online word-processing program Writely) and of course YouTube. As a result, almost no gaps are left in Google’s consumer portfolio… and no $50+ million opportunities remain for startups other than in “Social Networking,” where Google might buy an existing community such as Facebook (estimates vary between $1 billion and $2 billion).

Google has clearly figured out that the advertising market is not big enough to justify its stock market valuation. The entire U.S. advertising market is $140 billion a year • that’s less than Google’s current market cap of $151 billion.

Which takes us to the Small-to-Medium Business (SMB) market. To grow, Google clearly is going after Microsoft’s SMB business. The chart below describes Google’s current product offerings, many of which have been filled by small acquisitions, with an educated guess as to where they are going in both the consumer and SMB markets.

activegridgraphic.bmp

Why is Microsoft vulnerable in SMB? Late to the Internet, Microsoft never really caught up. Its proprietary technology is archaic in a Web 2.0 world where systems can be easily “mashed up,” or tied together with lightweight integration techniques, using open technologies. Microsoft’s Windows Live is a nonstarter.

Within a year or two, companies with fewer than 100 employees will have no need to buy anything from Redmond other than perhaps Windows XP Home; within five years, the same will go for firms with under 1,000 employees.

The critical play for Google, in my opinion, is to acquire Intuit (current market cap of $12 billion). That would give Google a channel to a hosted accounting and inventory system and a majority of small businesses. In particular, the inventory functionality can tie directly into the local business search and mapping engine, Google Local. Also affordable to Google would be Salesforce.com (current market cap of $5 billion), though that’s more of a stretch due to the personalities involved.

Web 2.0 consumer and SMB startups that do not have large communities will be valued at a build vs. buy (i.e. an acquisition that doesn’t cost much) and have a maximum upside of $50 million. After Google’s failed Enterprise Search product, the consumer search giant will leave the enterprise alone for quite a while as it target its guns on the SMB market.

The clearest short-term opportunity for startups to avoid the steamroller is in the enterprise space, which commands relatively high valuations (e.g., 25 times annual revenues for open source companies like JBoss).

Although some may be happy with $50 million paydays after a seed and A round, if you want a shot at making some real money, best to stay out of Google’s way.

Tags: , , , , ,
Trackback URL

2 Trackbacks

  1. Only 50 Million « Ralston Ventures said:

    [...] But at the end of the day, you’ve got people drinking the Silicon Valley kool-aid with the following statements:  Within a year or two, companies with fewer than 100 employees will have no need to buy anything from Redmond other than perhaps Windows XP Home; within five years, the same will go for firms with under 1,000 employees. [...]

  2. links for 2006-11-21 « timtowle said:

    [...] Venture Beat Contributors » Googlogy, and how to avoid the Google Juggernaut “The clearest short-term opportunity for startups to avoid the steamroller is in the enterprise space…” (tags: google local) [...]

6 Comments

  1. Peter Cranstone said:

    What about Mobile. Google still hasn’t figured out how to deliver ads yet. Also with GPS becoming standard on smartphones, Google still hasn’t figured out how to access that data in real time.

    Google is great on the server side of things… they have no presence on the client side. Where’s the Google toolbar for mobile?

  2. Jesse said:

    What are people’s thoughts on ZIMBRA as an acquisition? Its building a large SMB prescence and could provide Google a good foot in the door.

  3. dhoom said:

    nice comparisions. I have seen that mostly google buys for technology and pays a small sum. Otherwise it can buy new businesses where it doesnt have a strong consumer foothold.

  4. Herman said:

    For starters, stock market values reflect the discounted stream of ALL future earnings from all business units, not the one-year revenue of a single (albeit currently important) industry. Two, to say there are no opportunities left for small consumer companies is sort of like saying with 6 mainframes out there, the world computer market is saturated….

  5. Jeff Tokarz said:

    Hmmm…. sounds like its time for some companies to fire sale assets on eBay!

  6. adam said:

    i dont necessarily agree. they are obviously going to increase thier business whatever they can but your analysis that the advertising market is small and is not big enough is not correct. you are comparing a stock ($150bn marketcap) with a flow ($140b/year ad market). the ad market is $140b/YEAR whereas google has only about $7-8bn of that which is also only related to the online market. the youtube acquisition helps go after the TV ad budget.

Add a Comment