<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Danger, and its IPO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/21/danger-and-its-ipo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/21/danger-and-its-ipo/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:11:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Marshall</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/21/danger-and-its-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-6890</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/21/danger-and-its-ipo/#comment-6890</guid>
		<description>Scott, sorry, I forgot the  ending to the line I struck, and so erroneously cut the rest of the post. I&#039;ve restored it. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, sorry, I forgot the  ending to the line I struck, and so erroneously cut the rest of the post. I&#8217;ve restored it. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rafer</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/21/danger-and-its-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-6870</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rafer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/21/danger-and-its-ipo/#comment-6870</guid>
		<description>Why get rid of the Berggi snarkiness and the Danger differentiation comment. Were they incorrect somehow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why get rid of the Berggi snarkiness and the Danger differentiation comment. Were they incorrect somehow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
