<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo just needs to fix one thing: Monetization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carl E. Person</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/comment-page-1/#comment-613496</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl E. Person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/#comment-613496</guid>
		<description>Here is the solution, one which I&#039;m now asking the federal courts to determine: require Google to allow me, Yahoo and other website owners to monetize their website traffic using Google&#039;s AdWords system on a non-discriminatory basis. The justification? Because Google acquired its monopoly in search advertising (and monetization of social networking websites) through acquisitions, not through in-house development. The remedy is to push back Google&#039;s pricing to pre-monopoly levels. See my brief on appeal and supporting record references at my website www.lawmall.com/google.
Carl E. Person
Plaintiff pro se and antitrust and
civil rights lawyer.
PS. I was running for NYS Attorney General in 2006 thinking I could develop an email list of 1,000,000 names at 1 cent per click, and at the start of my efforts Google changed my price for unwanted keywords to $.50 per click, while continuing to charge ebay only 1/2 cent per click for the same &quot;unwanted&quot; words.
Carl E. Person</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the solution, one which I&#8217;m now asking the federal courts to determine: require Google to allow me, Yahoo and other website owners to monetize their website traffic using Google&#8217;s AdWords system on a non-discriminatory basis. The justification? Because Google acquired its monopoly in search advertising (and monetization of social networking websites) through acquisitions, not through in-house development. The remedy is to push back Google&#8217;s pricing to pre-monopoly levels. See my brief on appeal and supporting record references at my website <a href="http://www.lawmall.com/google" rel="nofollow">http://www.lawmall.com/google</a>.<br />
Carl E. Person<br />
Plaintiff pro se and antitrust and<br />
civil rights lawyer.<br />
PS. I was running for NYS Attorney General in 2006 thinking I could develop an email list of 1,000,000 names at 1 cent per click, and at the start of my efforts Google changed my price for unwanted keywords to $.50 per click, while continuing to charge ebay only 1/2 cent per click for the same &#8220;unwanted&#8221; words.<br />
Carl E. Person</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo: Worst year ever? - Top Stocks</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/comment-page-1/#comment-568486</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo: Worst year ever? - Top Stocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/#comment-568486</guid>
		<description>[...] system, Panama, needed to soar instead of stall. Yahoo should have been rolling out big moves to monetize its incredible user base. I use Yahoo every day -- e-mail, IM, finance and Flickr. I don&#039;t pay a cent for these services. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] system, Panama, needed to soar instead of stall. Yahoo should have been rolling out big moves to monetize its incredible user base. I use Yahoo every day &#8212; e-mail, IM, finance and Flickr. I don&#8217;t pay a cent for these services. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/comment-page-1/#comment-514544</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 08:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/#comment-514544</guid>
		<description>Hello, I came across your blog posting after searching for sports betting sites and your post on Yahoo just needs to fix one thing: Monetization makes an interesting read. Thanks for sharing. I will research more next Thursday when I have the day off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I came across your blog posting after searching for sports betting sites and your post on Yahoo just needs to fix one thing: Monetization makes an interesting read. Thanks for sharing. I will research more next Thursday when I have the day off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greenlight Wireless Blog &#187; CPA ads on Skweezer</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/comment-page-1/#comment-17558</link>
		<dc:creator>Greenlight Wireless Blog &#187; CPA ads on Skweezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/#comment-17558</guid>
		<description>[...] I was just reading an article by Dave McClure entitled â€œYahoo just needs to fix one thing: Monetizationâ€œ. He outlines three ideas for helping Yahoo skweeze squeeze more profit out of each search: finish a new advertising platform, do Cost-Per-Action (CPA) advertising, and acquire more startups. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was just reading an article by Dave McClure entitled â€œYahoo just needs to fix one thing: Monetizationâ€œ. He outlines three ideas for helping Yahoo skweeze squeeze more profit out of each search: finish a new advertising platform, do Cost-Per-Action (CPA) advertising, and acquire more startups. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/comment-page-1/#comment-17554</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/#comment-17554</guid>
		<description>Good Contribution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Contribution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Gotch</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/comment-page-1/#comment-17161</link>
		<dc:creator>G Gotch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/#comment-17161</guid>
		<description>Is it really that or more that the internet isn&#039;t just about content or functionality but also about popularity and the need for something new and fresh. Websites are becoming like the Lindsey Lohans and Paris Hiltons of the moment. Extremely popular, but outside of that, is there anything really that different outside of being &quot;popular&quot;. Take the rise of Google, it wasn&#039;t just the great search results that launched it to the stars, it was also the world of mouth popularity, and now that is is a 500 buck stock, their current position is guaranteed through the popularity of their sucess.
The thing is, these stars are of the moment and when friends find something new, being everyone is linked they are gather there. So in a way websites, search, whatever is like the favorite style of the moment. Whoever has the next cool new thing that basically does things a little different, that will be the next destination. How else can you explain U-Tube and how much longer can people stayed glued to amatuers dancing to a webcam? Remember, something new is a 1 sec click away!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it really that or more that the internet isn&#8217;t just about content or functionality but also about popularity and the need for something new and fresh. Websites are becoming like the Lindsey Lohans and Paris Hiltons of the moment. Extremely popular, but outside of that, is there anything really that different outside of being &#8220;popular&#8221;. Take the rise of Google, it wasn&#8217;t just the great search results that launched it to the stars, it was also the world of mouth popularity, and now that is is a 500 buck stock, their current position is guaranteed through the popularity of their sucess.<br />
The thing is, these stars are of the moment and when friends find something new, being everyone is linked they are gather there. So in a way websites, search, whatever is like the favorite style of the moment. Whoever has the next cool new thing that basically does things a little different, that will be the next destination. How else can you explain U-Tube and how much longer can people stayed glued to amatuers dancing to a webcam? Remember, something new is a 1 sec click away!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl E. Person</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/comment-page-1/#comment-17038</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl E. Person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/#comment-17038</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t search engines competing with Google (including Yahoo, MSN, 7Search) offer AdWords-type PPC advertising services through legitimate auctions (where the prices are set by the advertisers, not Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc.) and (A) filter out multiple clicks to stop click fraud; and (B) display an identifying code for each advertiser to inform the search-engine users what type of website is running the ad (such as a website with all ads and no content; a website providing ads with reviews or other content; a website providing comparative pricing, etc.). In this way, let the free informed market determine the price of AdWords-type advertising instead of having Google fix the prices through its present practices of unilaterally halting ads unless the advertiser agrees to pay 50, or 100 or 500 times more than he/she wanted to bid?
Carl E. Person
Please look at my antitrust complaint against Google/AdWords at www.lawmall.com/google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t search engines competing with Google (including Yahoo, MSN, 7Search) offer AdWords-type PPC advertising services through legitimate auctions (where the prices are set by the advertisers, not Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc.) and (A) filter out multiple clicks to stop click fraud; and (B) display an identifying code for each advertiser to inform the search-engine users what type of website is running the ad (such as a website with all ads and no content; a website providing ads with reviews or other content; a website providing comparative pricing, etc.). In this way, let the free informed market determine the price of AdWords-type advertising instead of having Google fix the prices through its present practices of unilaterally halting ads unless the advertiser agrees to pay 50, or 100 or 500 times more than he/she wanted to bid?<br />
Carl E. Person<br />
Please look at my antitrust complaint against Google/AdWords at <a href="http://www.lawmall.com/google" rel="nofollow">http://www.lawmall.com/google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Wakefield</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/comment-page-1/#comment-17020</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Wakefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/#comment-17020</guid>
		<description>It boils down to the ad engine and overall execution. Yahoo is a media company, Google is an advertising company, itâ€™s all about Adwords and Adsense and have done a terrific job of optimizing both. How many SMEâ€™s rave about â€œYahoo! Search Marketing Productsâ€?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It boils down to the ad engine and overall execution. Yahoo is a media company, Google is an advertising company, itâ€™s all about Adwords and Adsense and have done a terrific job of optimizing both. How many SMEâ€™s rave about â€œYahoo! Search Marketing Productsâ€?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Praized Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Google the Only Company Properly Monetizing their Online Traffic?</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/comment-page-1/#comment-17009</link>
		<dc:creator>The Praized Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Google the Only Company Properly Monetizing their Online Traffic?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 00:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/#comment-17009</guid>
		<description>[...] Read with interest this analysis from Dave McClure  on VentureBeat.com. In reference to all the noise that happened around the Peanut Butter Manifesto, he contends that Yahoo&#8217;s main problem currently is monetization. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read with interest this analysis from Dave McClure  on VentureBeat.com. In reference to all the noise that happened around the Peanut Butter Manifesto, he contends that Yahoo&#8217;s main problem currently is monetization. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave McClure</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/comment-page-1/#comment-17007</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave McClure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 00:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/#comment-17007</guid>
		<description>ed: guessing you have not heard about Yahoo Publishing Network (aka YPN):
  http://publisher.yahoo.com/

YPN launched in beta to US-based publishers in August 2005.

however, i think the comment you meant to suggest was that Yahoo might want to do more to promote YPN as an alternative to AdSense.

any Yahoos want to respond on that one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ed: guessing you have not heard about Yahoo Publishing Network (aka YPN):<br />
  <a href="http://publisher.yahoo.com/" rel="nofollow">http://publisher.yahoo.com/</a></p>
<p>YPN launched in beta to US-based publishers in August 2005.</p>
<p>however, i think the comment you meant to suggest was that Yahoo might want to do more to promote YPN as an alternative to AdSense.</p>
<p>any Yahoos want to respond on that one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/comment-page-1/#comment-17006</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/#comment-17006</guid>
		<description>The only thing yahoo! needs to do better is pffer an alternative to AdSense. Gooogle currently has 100% of the market. Yahoo!, launch something, anything, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing yahoo! needs to do better is pffer an alternative to AdSense. Gooogle currently has 100% of the market. Yahoo!, launch something, anything, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fixing Yahoo &#171; Joe Duck</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/comment-page-1/#comment-17005</link>
		<dc:creator>Fixing Yahoo &#171; Joe Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/#comment-17005</guid>
		<description>[...] Over at Venture Beat Dave&#8217;s got a plan for Yahoo. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Over at Venture Beat Dave&#8217;s got a plan for Yahoo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Hunkins</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/comment-page-1/#comment-17004</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Hunkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/#comment-17004</guid>
		<description>Right on - but it&#039;s even easier.  Publishers are willing to spend a LOT of innovations and time finding the best monetization relationships with search engines and these can generally beat Google&#039;s automated routines.  If you add this to cost per sale follow up metrics  you have something that is unspoofable and better than Google.  Google is milking the cow until the cow gets smart. Fortunately for Google them  evolution is slow and humans are stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on &#8211; but it&#8217;s even easier.  Publishers are willing to spend a LOT of innovations and time finding the best monetization relationships with search engines and these can generally beat Google&#8217;s automated routines.  If you add this to cost per sale follow up metrics  you have something that is unspoofable and better than Google.  Google is milking the cow until the cow gets smart. Fortunately for Google them  evolution is slow and humans are stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/comment-page-1/#comment-17003</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 20:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/#comment-17003</guid>
		<description>[disclosure: I work at and evangelize Yahoo]

Thomas,

You&#039;re seeing the first steps in this monetization with the release of Flickr&#039;s Camera Finder [http://www.flickr.com/cameras/]. By taking the implicit meta-data left behind as our users interact with these services, we can aggregate and package data &amp; recommendations that are useful for everyone, even for those that do not use the service. With this aggregation and packaging, flickr now has an excellent place to go research digital cameras which, if I were a camera maker, I would love to spend ad dollars. Transactional links to shopping.yahoo.com are already plugged into each individual camera page which speaks directly to Dave&#039;s suggestion of more CPA type opportunity.

Thanks for the post Dave. Not going to comment except to say that we&#039;re very focused on the points you raise and looking forward to stretching our legs as we come out of the blocks with the new Ad Platform.

Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[disclosure: I work at and evangelize Yahoo]</p>
<p>Thomas,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re seeing the first steps in this monetization with the release of Flickr&#8217;s Camera Finder [http://www.flickr.com/cameras/]. By taking the implicit meta-data left behind as our users interact with these services, we can aggregate and package data &amp; recommendations that are useful for everyone, even for those that do not use the service. With this aggregation and packaging, flickr now has an excellent place to go research digital cameras which, if I were a camera maker, I would love to spend ad dollars. Transactional links to shopping.yahoo.com are already plugged into each individual camera page which speaks directly to Dave&#8217;s suggestion of more CPA type opportunity.</p>
<p>Thanks for the post Dave. Not going to comment except to say that we&#8217;re very focused on the points you raise and looking forward to stretching our legs as we come out of the blocks with the new Ad Platform.</p>
<p>Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Moskalyuk</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/comment-page-1/#comment-17002</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Moskalyuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/contributors/2006/11/30/yahoo_monetization/#comment-17002</guid>
		<description>This one is hard not to agree with. With proper monetization Yahoo! has quite a few of strong properties that generally get omitted in Yahoo! vs Google comparisons.

Yahoo! Mail is either #1 or #2, depending on whose numbers you look at, always vying for top spot with Hotmail.

Yahoo! News is #1 in news sites, with CNN and others lagging a bit.

Yahoo! Finance is #1 with such a huge lead, that it&#039;s not even worth mentioning any competitors.

In quite a few other categories, like sports, instant messaging, comparison shopping and search it&#039;s in the top 3.

With the exception of search I don&#039;t see Google getting anywhere near the top in all of the above mentioned categories. Maybe news, if Google ever starts hosting feeds from Reuters, AP, etc. But so far their competitive products have not caught up. They naysayers usually say &quot;but wait, Google&#039;s products are brand new, it takes a while to get market share established&quot;, so by now Gmail must have caught up with the leading players, right? Ahh, not really, Gmail is still at single-digit market share with growth reaching the plateau a while ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one is hard not to agree with. With proper monetization Yahoo! has quite a few of strong properties that generally get omitted in Yahoo! vs Google comparisons.</p>
<p>Yahoo! Mail is either #1 or #2, depending on whose numbers you look at, always vying for top spot with Hotmail.</p>
<p>Yahoo! News is #1 in news sites, with CNN and others lagging a bit.</p>
<p>Yahoo! Finance is #1 with such a huge lead, that it&#8217;s not even worth mentioning any competitors.</p>
<p>In quite a few other categories, like sports, instant messaging, comparison shopping and search it&#8217;s in the top 3.</p>
<p>With the exception of search I don&#8217;t see Google getting anywhere near the top in all of the above mentioned categories. Maybe news, if Google ever starts hosting feeds from Reuters, AP, etc. But so far their competitive products have not caught up. They naysayers usually say &#8220;but wait, Google&#8217;s products are brand new, it takes a while to get market share established&#8221;, so by now Gmail must have caught up with the leading players, right? Ahh, not really, Gmail is still at single-digit market share with growth reaching the plateau a while ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
