<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women&#8217;s fashion network Glam raises $18.5 million at whopping valuation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:10:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erica</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-798038</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/#comment-798038</guid>
		<description>Good for Glam...I love the website</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for Glam&#8230;I love the website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VentureBeat &#187; Glam still raising up to $200 in cash and debt, announcement coming soon</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-765802</link>
		<dc:creator>VentureBeat &#187; Glam still raising up to $200 in cash and debt, announcement coming soon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/#comment-765802</guid>
		<description>[...] million, not more. Even that is high, considering Glam is mere four years old and was valued at $150 million a year ago. (Though IGN, a men&#8217;s/gaming site comparable to Glam in size, was purchased by Fox for $650 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] million, not more. Even that is high, considering Glam is mere four years old and was valued at $150 million a year ago. (Though IGN, a men&#8217;s/gaming site comparable to Glam in size, was purchased by Fox for $650 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glam: #1 network for women</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-367904</link>
		<dc:creator>Glam: #1 network for women</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 02:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/#comment-367904</guid>
		<description>[...] Accel Partners, Draper Fisher Jurvetson, WaldenVC, and Information Capital, the company had a valuation of $150 million after the last $18.5 million Series C round in December [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Accel Partners, Draper Fisher Jurvetson, WaldenVC, and Information Capital, the company had a valuation of $150 million after the last $18.5 million Series C round in December [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le donne e il web (2.0 o 1.0 che sia)</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-7559</link>
		<dc:creator>Le donne e il web (2.0 o 1.0 che sia)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/#comment-7559</guid>
		<description>[...] Glam Media, sito web a target prettamente femminile che vanta 7 milioni di accessi unici al mese ha raccolto 18.5 milioni di dollari da venture capitalist ultimamente, portando il suo &quot;budget&quot; a 30 milioni di dollari, cifra davvero notevole per una societÃ  relativamente giovane... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Glam Media, sito web a target prettamente femminile che vanta 7 milioni di accessi unici al mese ha raccolto 18.5 milioni di dollari da venture capitalist ultimamente, portando il suo &#8220;budget&#8221; a 30 milioni di dollari, cifra davvero notevole per una societÃ  relativamente giovane&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Marshall</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-7279</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 14:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/#comment-7279</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be talking with them more in January. Mike, yes, the trojan horse shopping angle might cleverer than I realized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be talking with them more in January. Mike, yes, the trojan horse shopping angle might cleverer than I realized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VentureBeat Wire &#187; Women&#8217;s fashion network Glam raises $18.5 million at whopping valuation</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-7251</link>
		<dc:creator>VentureBeat Wire &#187; Women&#8217;s fashion network Glam raises $18.5 million at whopping valuation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/#comment-7251</guid>
		<description>[...] See our story here.   VentureBeat Community [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See our story here.   VentureBeat Community [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traffic is Magical &#187; Wisdump</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-7246</link>
		<dc:creator>Traffic is Magical &#187; Wisdump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/#comment-7246</guid>
		<description>[...] For more information on the Glam investment checkout Venture Beat which reports that in total they have received over $30 million in investments. Stunning. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For more information on the Glam investment checkout Venture Beat which reports that in total they have received over $30 million in investments. Stunning. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-7245</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/#comment-7245</guid>
		<description>Glam may be a top 10 women&#039;s site as sited by the article, but its Alexa ranking is barely top 10,000. About 100 reach per million users.

The $150M valuation gives them $1.5M valuation for 1 out of 1 million Internet users. In another word, each US woman (or man) daily visitor to the site is valued at about $10,000 (at least a few thousand dollars).

An unusually high growth rate must have been assumed to make the numbers right. (I am not predicting whether Glam can achieve that kind of growth rate or not.)

The site is glamorously designed. But its content, at least at the first look, is also highly and obviously commercialized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glam may be a top 10 women&#8217;s site as sited by the article, but its Alexa ranking is barely top 10,000. About 100 reach per million users.</p>
<p>The $150M valuation gives them $1.5M valuation for 1 out of 1 million Internet users. In another word, each US woman (or man) daily visitor to the site is valued at about $10,000 (at least a few thousand dollars).</p>
<p>An unusually high growth rate must have been assumed to make the numbers right. (I am not predicting whether Glam can achieve that kind of growth rate or not.)</p>
<p>The site is glamorously designed. But its content, at least at the first look, is also highly and obviously commercialized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-7244</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/#comment-7244</guid>
		<description>Innotateâ€“ I agree completely! We women ARE being under marketed to- but I am a corprate slave but admit to having guilty pleasures (chocolotae, the dish you know) so did not care about the lowbrow remark. 

BTW Glam feels like they are doing it right to me. Why? Take a look at all the print magazines we all read- InStyle, Vogue, Marie Claire, Domino. Their websites are LAME. Yet they have so many advertisers- last September Vogue was thicker than the BIBLE!!! So if the geeks that watch YouTube all day or digg or whatever feel j$1.6B buyout by Google for a site that does not even make their own content and has zero revenue is justified and iVillage sold to NBC for $700 million, then I think Glam will certainly do better than them.

Why?

When I was at AOL Steve Case said- it&#039;s the subscription Stupid- in this case It&#039;s the CPM&#039;s stupid. Do the math- as a media buyer in an agency- at $20-$200 (clickz says) eCPM&#039;s, Glam sounds like a $100&#039;s million company. I wonder why did the did such a big raise then, may be they see something like YouTube or Google did early on- but it does sound odd. e-commerce, a big deal like Google-AOL, buying Digg?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Innotateâ€“ I agree completely! We women ARE being under marketed to- but I am a corprate slave but admit to having guilty pleasures (chocolotae, the dish you know) so did not care about the lowbrow remark. </p>
<p>BTW Glam feels like they are doing it right to me. Why? Take a look at all the print magazines we all read- InStyle, Vogue, Marie Claire, Domino. Their websites are LAME. Yet they have so many advertisers- last September Vogue was thicker than the BIBLE!!! So if the geeks that watch YouTube all day or digg or whatever feel j$1.6B buyout by Google for a site that does not even make their own content and has zero revenue is justified and iVillage sold to NBC for $700 million, then I think Glam will certainly do better than them.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>When I was at AOL Steve Case said- it&#8217;s the subscription Stupid- in this case It&#8217;s the CPM&#8217;s stupid. Do the math- as a media buyer in an agency- at $20-$200 (clickz says) eCPM&#8217;s, Glam sounds like a $100&#8217;s million company. I wonder why did the did such a big raise then, may be they see something like YouTube or Google did early on- but it does sound odd. e-commerce, a big deal like Google-AOL, buying Digg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groundhog</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-7237</link>
		<dc:creator>Groundhog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/#comment-7237</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s an e-commerce site, that implies valuations in the range of 1.5-2x trailing revs.  You&#039;d have to assume some significant advertising component to come close to that valution (unles we really think they are doing $75 MM in e-commerce revs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s an e-commerce site, that implies valuations in the range of 1.5-2x trailing revs.  You&#8217;d have to assume some significant advertising component to come close to that valution (unles we really think they are doing $75 MM in e-commerce revs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: innonate &#187; More about Women and the Net</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-7236</link>
		<dc:creator>innonate &#187; More about Women and the Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/#comment-7236</guid>
		<description>[...] More evidence of people &#8220;getting&#8221; this came today, as VentureBeat reported that fashion network Glam Media raised another $18.5 million at a valuation of a staggering $150 million. What made this interesting to me was that the CNET author and I agreed that women were being under-marketed to in the online space, but not in lowbrow areas such as fashion and gossip. With sites like Glam, PopSugar, and a whole host of other women-oriented site, she and I agreed that where women are really being under-served is in the web app space, and specifically in the practical and useful web app space. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More evidence of people &#8220;getting&#8221; this came today, as VentureBeat reported that fashion network Glam Media raised another $18.5 million at a valuation of a staggering $150 million. What made this interesting to me was that the CNET author and I agreed that women were being under-marketed to in the online space, but not in lowbrow areas such as fashion and gossip. With sites like Glam, PopSugar, and a whole host of other women-oriented site, she and I agreed that where women are really being under-served is in the web app space, and specifically in the practical and useful web app space. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-7234</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/#comment-7234</guid>
		<description>Mike, I agree. Something is a little weird here. Perhaps they plan on doing an iVillage-esk ad campaign, which would certainly cost a ton of money without the NBC tie-in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, I agree. Something is a little weird here. Perhaps they plan on doing an iVillage-esk ad campaign, which would certainly cost a ton of money without the NBC tie-in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Masnick</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-7231</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/#comment-7231</guid>
		<description>I was under the impression that Glam was positioning itself not as a media property, but as an e-commerce property... the media component is just to get more people to buy.  Not that the valuation doesn&#039;t seem extremely high, but it might be that those involved view it in a different way than a media play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that Glam was positioning itself not as a media property, but as an e-commerce property&#8230; the media component is just to get more people to buy.  Not that the valuation doesn&#8217;t seem extremely high, but it might be that those involved view it in a different way than a media play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Startups.in/India</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-7226</link>
		<dc:creator>Startups.in/India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/#comment-7226</guid>
		<description>$30 million funding, $150 mil valuation for a media company? BIGGG BUBBLE?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$30 million funding, $150 mil valuation for a media company? BIGGG BUBBLE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VentureBeat Wire &#187; Women&#8217;s fashion network Glam raises $18.5 million at whopping valuation</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-7222</link>
		<dc:creator>VentureBeat Wire &#187; Women&#8217;s fashion network Glam raises $18.5 million at whopping valuation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/14/womens-fashion-network-glam-raises-19-million-at-whopping-valuation/#comment-7222</guid>
		<description>[...] See our story here.  VentureBeat Community [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See our story here.  VentureBeat Community [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
