<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Forbes Midas List &#8212; more info at VentureBeat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/01/26/the-forbes-midas-list-answer-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/01/26/the-forbes-midas-list-answer-back/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Marshall</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/01/26/the-forbes-midas-list-answer-back/comment-page-1/#comment-7784</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/01/26/the-forbes-midas-list-answer-back/#comment-7784</guid>
		<description>Yuri, I&#039;ve pasted it below, in case it wasn&#039;t obvious how to find it. If you&#039;re asking about &quot;methodology&quot; in a scientific science, i&#039;m not sure there&#039;s an equation available. Forbes basically looks at all the IPOs and acquisitions done in the past five years, and then looks which dealmakers played a role in getting them done. As you can expect, this requires some reporting about &quot;soft&quot; factors, including an assessment of how much an investor really helped a company, versus basing it on pure data (which often isn&#039;t available):

&quot;The Forbes Midas List seeks to identify individuals who deploy venture capital to create wealth for their investors and build valuable, long-lasting companies. Only tech and life sciences companies that have gone public or been acquired within the past five years are considered. Our ranking formula ignores the original amount invested in a deal (as it is often undisclosed), instead weighing most heavily the market capitalization of a venture-backed company on the close of the first day of trading or the final closing price of an acquisition. A lesser weight is given to the change in value of each investment since going public or being sold. Ranking also depends on a candidate&#039;s length of involvement in and depth of influence on a company.

Our results are based on extensive reporting and surveys sent to thousands of professionals, including angel investors, bankers, lawyers and venture capitalists. Please note that the bios for this year&#039;s Midas List may include references to deals that are not counted in the Midas ranking.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yuri, I&#8217;ve pasted it below, in case it wasn&#8217;t obvious how to find it. If you&#8217;re asking about &#8220;methodology&#8221; in a scientific science, i&#8217;m not sure there&#8217;s an equation available. Forbes basically looks at all the IPOs and acquisitions done in the past five years, and then looks which dealmakers played a role in getting them done. As you can expect, this requires some reporting about &#8220;soft&#8221; factors, including an assessment of how much an investor really helped a company, versus basing it on pure data (which often isn&#8217;t available):</p>
<p>&#8220;The Forbes Midas List seeks to identify individuals who deploy venture capital to create wealth for their investors and build valuable, long-lasting companies. Only tech and life sciences companies that have gone public or been acquired within the past five years are considered. Our ranking formula ignores the original amount invested in a deal (as it is often undisclosed), instead weighing most heavily the market capitalization of a venture-backed company on the close of the first day of trading or the final closing price of an acquisition. A lesser weight is given to the change in value of each investment since going public or being sold. Ranking also depends on a candidate&#8217;s length of involvement in and depth of influence on a company.</p>
<p>Our results are based on extensive reporting and surveys sent to thousands of professionals, including angel investors, bankers, lawyers and venture capitalists. Please note that the bios for this year&#8217;s Midas List may include references to deals that are not counted in the Midas ranking.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuri Ammosov</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/01/26/the-forbes-midas-list-answer-back/comment-page-1/#comment-7783</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuri Ammosov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/01/26/the-forbes-midas-list-answer-back/#comment-7783</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the methodology?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the methodology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
