<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sequoia Capital vs. ComVentures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:47:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/comment-page-1/#comment-8340</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 04:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/#comment-8340</guid>
		<description>Grinnel is the biggest backer of Com Ventures. They are the best VC ...Com ...Com...Cm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grinnel is the biggest backer of Com Ventures. They are the best VC &#8230;Com &#8230;Com&#8230;Cm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack largent</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/comment-page-1/#comment-8339</link>
		<dc:creator>jack largent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 04:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/#comment-8339</guid>
		<description>This may be the moment Sequoia jumped the shark.  These types of bullying tactics are things that sequoia does in deals, which are now playing out in public.  The bloom is off the rose.  They beat the hell out of people regularly, yet moritz and sequoia have this pristine air about them.  The truth is, they are nothing more than bad people picking onthe small guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be the moment Sequoia jumped the shark.  These types of bullying tactics are things that sequoia does in deals, which are now playing out in public.  The bloom is off the rose.  They beat the hell out of people regularly, yet moritz and sequoia have this pristine air about them.  The truth is, they are nothing more than bad people picking onthe small guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franc</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/comment-page-1/#comment-8338</link>
		<dc:creator>Franc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/#comment-8338</guid>
		<description>Well, I think both are doing with enough reasons.
Typically a firm needs to select a target to fight or compete or learn in order to build up internal strength and move up. In this case, Sequoia has a lot to be admired for.

On the other hand, Sequoia must have paid handsomely to design their websites. And no one
likes to be copied.

It would be even funnier if ComVentures hire someone to impersonate Mike Moritz. Then,
byebye Mr. CopyRight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think both are doing with enough reasons.<br />
Typically a firm needs to select a target to fight or compete or learn in order to build up internal strength and move up. In this case, Sequoia has a lot to be admired for.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Sequoia must have paid handsomely to design their websites. And no one<br />
likes to be copied.</p>
<p>It would be even funnier if ComVentures hire someone to impersonate Mike Moritz. Then,<br />
byebye Mr. CopyRight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathew</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/comment-page-1/#comment-8337</link>
		<dc:creator>mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/#comment-8337</guid>
		<description>more interestingly - did anyone see the comventures team profile photos?

http://mattishness.blogspot.com/2007/02/where-are-customers-yachts.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more interestingly &#8211; did anyone see the comventures team profile photos?</p>
<p><a href="http://mattishness.blogspot.com/2007/02/where-are-customers-yachts.html" rel="nofollow">http://mattishness.blogspot.com/2007/02/where-are-customers-yachts.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawyers Get Rich</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/comment-page-1/#comment-8336</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawyers Get Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/#comment-8336</guid>
		<description>Lawyers are undoubtedly laughing themselves to the bank on this one.  Makes you seriously wonder about VC decision making...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawyers are undoubtedly laughing themselves to the bank on this one.  Makes you seriously wonder about VC decision making&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarius</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/comment-page-1/#comment-8334</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/#comment-8334</guid>
		<description>Sequoia is just a bully firm, thats the way they play. Playground bullies to the end.  Either you make em 10x in a year or you are out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sequoia is just a bully firm, thats the way they play. Playground bullies to the end.  Either you make em 10x in a year or you are out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VC Watcher</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/comment-page-1/#comment-8328</link>
		<dc:creator>VC Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/02/27/sequoia-capital-vs-comventures/#comment-8328</guid>
		<description>This lawsuit isn&#039;t the cause, just a symptom. There&#039;s no love lost here.

It&#039;s easy to get a lawsuit going for such a trivial reason because Sequoia could prove when the incident happened (access logs) and present a piece of HTML from both that have substantial similarity. With a rhetorical thrust, one argues visual similarity. A lawyer can keep this one alive for quite a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This lawsuit isn&#8217;t the cause, just a symptom. There&#8217;s no love lost here.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to get a lawsuit going for such a trivial reason because Sequoia could prove when the incident happened (access logs) and present a piece of HTML from both that have substantial similarity. With a rhetorical thrust, one argues visual similarity. A lawyer can keep this one alive for quite a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
