Comments on: Will Outside.in nail the community Web site? Maybe

By: übersetzungen

übersetzungen — Sun, 03 Feb 2008 19:35:10 +0000

sşlejgfşeg

By: shawfactor

shawfactor — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:23:09 +0000

I think the approach taken by localHero is far superior: http://localhero.biz/

By: Martin

Martin — Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:25:15 +0000

I suspect their ultimate monetization strategy will be to re-syndicate this content to local newspapers.

By: tercüme

tercüme — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:33:28 +0000

These cookie-cutter sites that scrape content do nothing for me. There’s nothing there, except some random blog headlines, that evokes a feeling of community.

By: dooetuulsz

dooetuulsz — Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:05:00 +0000

Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! fokidhnvbzn

By: Richard Ault

Richard Ault — Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:15:09 +0000

Metroblogging, 53 cities, 16 countries, 650+ people contributing to the sites. It’s also been around for over 2 years. Perfect model, not yet, but getting closer every day.

By: Ed Kohler

Ed Kohler — Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:04:54 +0000

Pretty much every click and youâ€™re off-site. Even IF the sites manage to gain traction in their local markets, there really isnâ€™t any inventory to sell.

Yeah, sounds like the same problem Google has.

By: Duncan Gough

Duncan Gough — Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:53:59 +0000

It’s an interesting problem, building a community takes real skill and fragmenting your audience into location sensitive groups makes the job even harder. I setup ecolocal (www.ecolocal.com) with much the same premise, and soon found that local news and events are so few and far between that it’s hard to gain any serious traction. As our site has grown it’s less of an issue, but there are bigger sites our there that offer location based content who still struggle to keep hold of their community.

As much as local news online is going to take off eventually, and maybe even replace traditional local newspapers, it’s going to take old-fashioned methods to do it. If you want to build a local community online, then you need to get out into the health clubs, coffee shops and newsagents to talk to people, hand out flyers and get that word of mouth. Start in the areas you know and build up from there.

If anyone knows the phrase ‘internology’, you’ll know just what I mean

http://www.goodold.se/blog/trend/2006/09/21/new-media-strategies-according-to-rob-curley/

By: Cindy

Cindy — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:07:06 +0000

Why ePodunk is so much better than outside.in:
1) Lists OVER 46,000 communities (not 63 cities)
2) Lets users blog and review communities on the local blog section.. so if you don’t have a blog of your own, you can still weigh in on local issues.
3) ePodunk ACTUALLY DOES THEIR OWN RESEARCH. Trust me, I’ve emailed them. ouside.in provides literally no content of their own. At ePodunk you can read about a town’s history, quirks, see what movies are filmed there, find out which famous residents have lived there etc. etc..

Outside.in is reguritating local news. That’s it. I can’t believe they claim to promote online “community” and “neighbors” since if you are from a small town, you’re even not on outside.in’s radar. So, if you living in one of their selected communities.. you can read the news. Not quite exciting. End of story.

So if you say ePodunk “gets closer” to being a site that nails the online community idea.. maybe you haven’t visited in a while!

By: cg

cg — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:00:34 +0000

I don’t see an entrenched local newspaper wanting to buy most of the crap on Outside.in anyway. When I went to my city, there was absolutely nothing of value there. Too many of these VC people think that just because a site has good “local” content in Silicon Valley, that it’s a great national product. Nothing could be further from reality.

By: TPeters

TPeters — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:23:11 +0000

Wait… re-syndicate content to whom? The vast majority of the legitimate content being produced already belongs to local newspapers and TV stations. You’re saying they will buy it back from Outside.in??? Local portals like these will not happen until the major media players in a given market decide to make it happen. They have the content, they have the online distribution and they have the sales forces.

By: Derek Scruggs

Derek Scruggs — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 14:46:13 +0000

I suspect their ultimate monetization strategy will be to re-syndicate this content to local newspapers. Scripps is already having some success licensing their YourHub.com technology. It wouldn’t surprise me to see them buy/partner with Outside.in

By: Miguel

Miguel — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 05:39:36 +0000

These cookie-cutter sites that scrape content do nothing for me. There’s nothing there, except some random blog headlines, that evokes a feeling of community. Bleh.

By: C

Thu, 01 Mar 2007 05:29:20 +0000

yeah seriously, this website does nothing that I probably couldn’t do with my Netvibes account.

By: TPeters

TPeters — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:42:09 +0000

Pretty much every click and you’re off-site. Even IF the sites manage to gain traction in their local markets, there really isn’t any inventory to sell. If I were the dominant local media in the communities they serve, I’d send them a nice bottle of bubbly. If Outside.in succeeds all they will manage to do is drive more users to the sites they reference = more inventory for THOSE sites. Next….?