<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baidu&#8217;s click-fraud problem, and more on Fraudwall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/03/19/baidus-click-fraud-problem-and-more-on-fraudwall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/03/19/baidus-click-fraud-problem-and-more-on-fraudwall/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:54:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joe blow</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/03/19/baidus-click-fraud-problem-and-more-on-fraudwall/comment-page-1/#comment-773166</link>
		<dc:creator>joe blow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/03/19/baidus-click-fraud-problem-and-more-on-fraudwall/#comment-773166</guid>
		<description>this seems pretty sketchy to me.  not that baidu or google or any other ad-based web site (search or otherwise) can be a victim of so-called &quot;click fraud&quot; -- but the definition of it in this &quot;study&quot;.  so it i don&#039;t intend to buy something when i click on an ad, i have committed fraud? that is silly.  moreover, that the &quot;study&quot; reports its finding that &quot;advertisers believe&quot; that over 30% of the clicks are fraud is weak.  show me a concerted effort on the part of competitors, not a belief by advertisers who are likely seeking lower advertising rates.  finally, the connection to google, ask, and other baidu competitors of the people claiming click fraud is rampant at baidu removes any credibility from this report.  nice try</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this seems pretty sketchy to me.  not that baidu or google or any other ad-based web site (search or otherwise) can be a victim of so-called &#8220;click fraud&#8221; &#8212; but the definition of it in this &#8220;study&#8221;.  so it i don&#8217;t intend to buy something when i click on an ad, i have committed fraud? that is silly.  moreover, that the &#8220;study&#8221; reports its finding that &#8220;advertisers believe&#8221; that over 30% of the clicks are fraud is weak.  show me a concerted effort on the part of competitors, not a belief by advertisers who are likely seeking lower advertising rates.  finally, the connection to google, ask, and other baidu competitors of the people claiming click fraud is rampant at baidu removes any credibility from this report.  nice try</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 三洋伺服</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/03/19/baidus-click-fraud-problem-and-more-on-fraudwall/comment-page-1/#comment-397798</link>
		<dc:creator>三洋伺服</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 02:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/03/19/baidus-click-fraud-problem-and-more-on-fraudwall/#comment-397798</guid>
		<description>i like baidu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like baidu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
