<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile landgrab: Microsoft releases Deepfish, follows Minimo Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/03/29/mobile-landgrab-microsoft-releases-deepfish-follows-minimo-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/03/29/mobile-landgrab-microsoft-releases-deepfish-follows-minimo-project/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:19:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: micke-jx</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/03/29/mobile-landgrab-microsoft-releases-deepfish-follows-minimo-project/comment-page-1/#comment-11724</link>
		<dc:creator>micke-jx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 14:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/03/29/mobile-landgrab-microsoft-releases-deepfish-follows-minimo-project/#comment-11724</guid>
		<description>firefox, thunderbird, deepfish... (some monkey I think I&#039;ve heard of too) animals in the software app space popping up where you look. MSFT, that was not too innovative. Hm, and the browser itself? Anyone compared it to the S60 browser in S60 3.0?  If we assume this announced MSFT browser version hitting the market for all users same time as S60 Feature Pack 2, then there&#039;s nothing exciting in the MSFT spec as far as I can see, layout preservation, RSS support, widget support, javascript, all there. Anyone spotted some real differentiators?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>firefox, thunderbird, deepfish&#8230; (some monkey I think I&#8217;ve heard of too) animals in the software app space popping up where you look. MSFT, that was not too innovative. Hm, and the browser itself? Anyone compared it to the S60 browser in S60 3.0?  If we assume this announced MSFT browser version hitting the market for all users same time as S60 Feature Pack 2, then there&#8217;s nothing exciting in the MSFT spec as far as I can see, layout preservation, RSS support, widget support, javascript, all there. Anyone spotted some real differentiators?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathew</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/03/29/mobile-landgrab-microsoft-releases-deepfish-follows-minimo-project/comment-page-1/#comment-10194</link>
		<dc:creator>mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/03/29/mobile-landgrab-microsoft-releases-deepfish-follows-minimo-project/#comment-10194</guid>
		<description>this is msft&#039;s acquisition of seadragon paying off already?

madrona put a small amount of money in to seadragon and had it sold on to msft in like 6 months. nice quick work. and returns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is msft&#8217;s acquisition of seadragon paying off already?</p>
<p>madrona put a small amount of money in to seadragon and had it sold on to msft in like 6 months. nice quick work. and returns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
