<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech CEOs get bigger salaries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/04/18/tech-ceos-get-bigger-salaries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/04/18/tech-ceos-get-bigger-salaries/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:19:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sad Very Sad</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/04/18/tech-ceos-get-bigger-salaries/comment-page-1/#comment-835211</link>
		<dc:creator>Sad Very Sad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/04/18/tech-ceos-get-bigger-salaries/#comment-835211</guid>
		<description>Sad very sad, bankers and money managers on Wall street (in alternative investment areas HF, PE, IB) who are in there late 20s to early 30&#039;s (who graduate out of those top 10 MBA programs) make more money than these 35 to 45 year old entrepreneurs who are equally brighter and more experienced (but less fast tracked).  I supposed these vested 120K of loans earns them a ticket to some lucrative financial return.  These entrepreneurs put in serious hard work and time to get to the point of where they are.  While these numbers are warranted, because these entreprenurs are visionary and hardworking, typical pursuants of the American dream, I think something is broken.  I supposed Wall Street is broken, which explains its death spiral of greed in 2008.  This also explains why there is very little venture-banked companies in the New York metro region.  Why go to VC when Wall Street offers you more structure, less uncertainty (prior to 2008), and better pay.  I think with banking falling with those respective salaries, VC activity will increase in the region.  Less focus on short-term liquid transactions, more long term oriented strategic investments to benefit the growth of society...  My 2cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad very sad, bankers and money managers on Wall street (in alternative investment areas HF, PE, IB) who are in there late 20s to early 30&#8217;s (who graduate out of those top 10 MBA programs) make more money than these 35 to 45 year old entrepreneurs who are equally brighter and more experienced (but less fast tracked).  I supposed these vested 120K of loans earns them a ticket to some lucrative financial return.  These entrepreneurs put in serious hard work and time to get to the point of where they are.  While these numbers are warranted, because these entreprenurs are visionary and hardworking, typical pursuants of the American dream, I think something is broken.  I supposed Wall Street is broken, which explains its death spiral of greed in 2008.  This also explains why there is very little venture-banked companies in the New York metro region.  Why go to VC when Wall Street offers you more structure, less uncertainty (prior to 2008), and better pay.  I think with banking falling with those respective salaries, VC activity will increase in the region.  Less focus on short-term liquid transactions, more long term oriented strategic investments to benefit the growth of society&#8230;  My 2cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMehta</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/04/18/tech-ceos-get-bigger-salaries/comment-page-1/#comment-49337</link>
		<dc:creator>AMehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/04/18/tech-ceos-get-bigger-salaries/#comment-49337</guid>
		<description>I am assuming that the % ownership figures here are for companies just got funded or in other words still have that start-up risk? Am I right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am assuming that the % ownership figures here are for companies just got funded or in other words still have that start-up risk? Am I right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pvilly</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/04/18/tech-ceos-get-bigger-salaries/comment-page-1/#comment-48876</link>
		<dc:creator>Pvilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/04/18/tech-ceos-get-bigger-salaries/#comment-48876</guid>
		<description>Curious if you had data for CFOs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious if you had data for CFOs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
