Comments on: Live Ink offers better way to read text online

By: xxooxx

xxooxx — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:22:55 +0000

Laptop Battery Laptop Battery Laptop Batteries
Laptop Batteries discount laptop battery
discount laptop battery
notebook battery notebook battery
computer battery computer battery
replacement laptop battery replacement laptop battery
notebook batteries notebook batteries

By: Matt Cutts

Matt Cutts — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:14:19 +0000

Matt Cutts…

Finance is one of the most important aspects of business management. A bank accepts deposits from lenders, on which it pays the interest….

By: free credit report online denied credit

free credit report online denied credit — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:51:32 +0000

free credit report online denied credit…

Keep up the great posts, I check back frequently….

By: Jessie

Jessie — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:42:17 +0000

Jessie…

This gives people who are otherwise averse to a traditional education system an opportunity to further their careers by getting a higher…

By: Enhancing Online Reading « third wave

Enhancing Online Reading « third wave — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:21:12 +0000

[...] A company called Walker Reading Technologies, conducted scientific research that would revolutionize online publication and reading. The study concluded that “the natural field of focus for our eyes is circular, so our eyes view the printed page as if we’re peering through a straw.” [1] [...]

By: Information/time « Fertile Ambition

Information/time « Fertile Ambition — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 23:47:09 +0000

[...] http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/10/live-ink-offers-better-way-to-read-text-online/ [...]

By: Miklos » « Une horreur subalterne : la vaste Bibliothèque contradictoire »

Sun, 04 Nov 2007 23:10:06 +0000

[...] la matérialisation dans un objet physique ressemblant au livre. Mais il existerait une autre approche. Walker Reading Technologies, pépinière américaine qui étudie depuis une dizaine [...]

By: Inter

Inter — Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:28:27 +0000

I liked the program and the technique very much.

But, I don’t understand why they needed $400M to
make a not so complicated program/algorithm.

The fact that it is patented, means that
I can’t use this technique in, say,
my e-mails, a Power Point slide or even
a hand written letter?

I don’t like, IMHO, their pricing scheme,
based on a subscription.
It is too expensive.

Why can’t they just charge for the program
once?

Thanks.

By: Explosions from a Small Mind » Blog Archive » Some cool stuff :-) 15 May 2007

Wed, 05 Sep 2007 03:05:44 +0000

[...] Our brains/eyes read like looking through a straw – new tech on fixing text to be read easily. [...]

By: links for 2007-08-31 at 水蘸李子 - V12N

links for 2007-08-31 at 水蘸李子 - V12N — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:51:05 +0000

[...] VentureBeat » Live Ink offers better way to read text online (tags: science) [...]

By: rascunho » Blog Archive » links for 2007-08-14

rascunho » Blog Archive » links for 2007-08-14 — Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:22:53 +0000

[...] VentureBeat » Live Ink offers better way to read text online (tags: venturebeat.com 2007 at_tecp live_link reading books) [...]

By: A Better Way Of Reading Online Text | Desperately Wandering

A Better Way Of Reading Online Text | Desperately Wandering — Mon, 06 Aug 2007 08:59:15 +0000

[...] From Venturebeat: [...]

By: Martin Cohen

Martin Cohen — Sun, 08 Jul 2007 17:23:16 +0000

Many years ago
(over 30)
I read some books
written in EXACTLY this style
by a couple named Leiber (iirc).
They were on scientific subjects
such as relativity
(special and general).
They were written for
“T.C.Mits”
which stood for
“The Common Man in the Street”.

I enjoyed them very much.

So, how can this be patented?

By: ann

ann — Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:33:05 +0000

re: danielmick 05.14.07 | 1:31 am
Maybe some of us get the point but have used similar techniques along with some not so widely held beliefs. Like tinted saran wrap. It works in some cases quite well. I guess the point is that there are no new, change the world saviors to address every reading problem.

By: fjgreer

fjgreer — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 06:59:37 +0000

Huh… am I the only one that found the LiveInk version distracting? It had way too many colors and despite what their claims say, I found the different formatting to detract from the content. All of my reading problems on a computer have been solved by using css that inverts black on white text to white on black. Guess my brain got used to reading computer console output.