<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only half of Bubble-era companies out of business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/14/only-half-of-bubble-era-companies-out-of-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/14/only-half-of-bubble-era-companies-out-of-business/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SonnoProfondo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Metà bolla è rimasta in piedi</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/14/only-half-of-bubble-era-companies-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-171473</link>
		<dc:creator>SonnoProfondo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Metà bolla è rimasta in piedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/14/only-half-of-bubble-era-companies-out-of-business/#comment-171473</guid>
		<description>[...] SiliconBeat contesta che questo sarà anche tutto vero in teoria, ma poi nella pratica ? Alcune società probabilmente stanno in piedi solo grazie ai fondi ormai considerati persi di alcuni venture capitalist, o sono state assorbite da altre società per pure ragioni di brand. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SiliconBeat contesta che questo sarà anche tutto vero in teoria, ma poi nella pratica ? Alcune società probabilmente stanno in piedi solo grazie ai fondi ormai considerati persi di alcuni venture capitalist, o sono state assorbite da altre società per pure ragioni di brand. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-05-15 &#171; John&#8217;s musing</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/14/only-half-of-bubble-era-companies-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-148569</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-05-15 &#171; John&#8217;s musing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 00:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/14/only-half-of-bubble-era-companies-out-of-business/#comment-148569</guid>
		<description>[...] VentureBeat » Only half of Bubble-era companies out of business I&#8217;d have been one to put money on most dot-doom companies having gone bust - lends further credence to the Y Combinator et al approach to larger numbers of smaller investments (tags: finance funding investments startups entrepreneurship business) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VentureBeat » Only half of Bubble-era companies out of business I&#8217;d have been one to put money on most dot-doom companies having gone bust &#8211; lends further credence to the Y Combinator et al approach to larger numbers of smaller investments (tags: finance funding investments startups entrepreneurship business) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Dahan</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/14/only-half-of-bubble-era-companies-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-147603</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Dahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 15:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/14/only-half-of-bubble-era-companies-out-of-business/#comment-147603</guid>
		<description>There must be a combination of a greater number of fundings on the Seed level and implementing a funding system with greater efficiency that either a Charles River &quot;QuickStart&quot;, the Angel model, or just a small-sized fund which is still modeled on the VC system.

There must also be a change in attitude among Funders - no longer will the pilgrimage to Sand Hill Road where Entrepreneurs genuflect and VCs pontificate work.

There must be recognition and support for the infrastructure which already exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There must be a combination of a greater number of fundings on the Seed level and implementing a funding system with greater efficiency that either a Charles River &#8220;QuickStart&#8221;, the Angel model, or just a small-sized fund which is still modeled on the VC system.</p>
<p>There must also be a change in attitude among Funders &#8211; no longer will the pilgrimage to Sand Hill Road where Entrepreneurs genuflect and VCs pontificate work.</p>
<p>There must be recognition and support for the infrastructure which already exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pran Kurup</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/14/only-half-of-bubble-era-companies-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-145041</link>
		<dc:creator>Pran Kurup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 22:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/14/only-half-of-bubble-era-companies-out-of-business/#comment-145041</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of small bets happening these days particularly in Web 2.0 (alongside the Joost kind of large investments). This wasn&#039;t the case in the dotcomm days when most of the investments were pretty substantial. So maybe 
many are learning from the past, though in a small way! :-) 

Interesting study, nevertheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of small bets happening these days particularly in Web 2.0 (alongside the Joost kind of large investments). This wasn&#8217;t the case in the dotcomm days when most of the investments were pretty substantial. So maybe<br />
many are learning from the past, though in a small way! <img src='http://venturebeat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Interesting study, nevertheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
