<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should UC Berkeley really reject $500M from Big Oil?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/17/should-uc-berkeley-really-reject-500m-from-big-oil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/17/should-uc-berkeley-really-reject-500m-from-big-oil/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:28:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VentureBeat &#187; Big Oil and UC Berkeley supporting cellulosic research</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/17/should-uc-berkeley-really-reject-500m-from-big-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-401580</link>
		<dc:creator>VentureBeat &#187; Big Oil and UC Berkeley supporting cellulosic research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 23:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/17/should-uc-berkeley-really-reject-500m-from-big-oil/#comment-401580</guid>
		<description>[...] our original piece about the UC-Berkeley-BP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] our original piece about the UC-Berkeley-BP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gal Josefsberg</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/17/should-uc-berkeley-really-reject-500m-from-big-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-159713</link>
		<dc:creator>Gal Josefsberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 16:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/17/should-uc-berkeley-really-reject-500m-from-big-oil/#comment-159713</guid>
		<description>In an ideal world, UCB could and should say no to this money.  Even if it doesn&#039;t taint their results, it will taint their credibility.  However, this is not an ideal world and the federal government is not funding research the way it should be.  So yes, UCB should accept the money and try to make something good of it.

GJ
http://www.60in3.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an ideal world, UCB could and should say no to this money.  Even if it doesn&#8217;t taint their results, it will taint their credibility.  However, this is not an ideal world and the federal government is not funding research the way it should be.  So yes, UCB should accept the money and try to make something good of it.</p>
<p>GJ<br />
<a href="http://www.60in3.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.60in3.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrique</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/17/should-uc-berkeley-really-reject-500m-from-big-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-159475</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 15:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/17/should-uc-berkeley-really-reject-500m-from-big-oil/#comment-159475</guid>
		<description>With that type of money, it also comes a lot of strings attach with it.  The article states,&quot;In return for its funding, BP will have the first right to negotiate an exclusive license to the research.&quot;
   Remember BP was the company that killed 14 workers in a Texas refinery because they did not want to spend money on maintance of the refinery.  BP is also the company that did not adequately supervised the pipelines in Alaska.
   As for the Tobbaco Industry, They are paying billions from the settlement done in the 1990&#039;s.  There is no advertisment of cigarrettes to kids through cartoons, sports events and no more marborol man ads on TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With that type of money, it also comes a lot of strings attach with it.  The article states,&#8221;In return for its funding, BP will have the first right to negotiate an exclusive license to the research.&#8221;<br />
   Remember BP was the company that killed 14 workers in a Texas refinery because they did not want to spend money on maintance of the refinery.  BP is also the company that did not adequately supervised the pipelines in Alaska.<br />
   As for the Tobbaco Industry, They are paying billions from the settlement done in the 1990&#8217;s.  There is no advertisment of cigarrettes to kids through cartoons, sports events and no more marborol man ads on TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Napier</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/17/should-uc-berkeley-really-reject-500m-from-big-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-157543</link>
		<dc:creator>Napier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 06:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/17/should-uc-berkeley-really-reject-500m-from-big-oil/#comment-157543</guid>
		<description>Those libbies that oppose *BIG OIL* should be tarred and feathered -- 500,000,000 is a lot of green we need here in the Golden State.  If we could only get Big Tobacco to be so generous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those libbies that oppose *BIG OIL* should be tarred and feathered &#8212; 500,000,000 is a lot of green we need here in the Golden State.  If we could only get Big Tobacco to be so generous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
