As the mini-boom (mini-bubble?) expands in
In that last category, our military academies – West Point, Annapolis, and others – are specifically tasked with instilling future Generals and Admirals with the fundamentals of
Service and of the art and science of leadership.
But are these skills appropriate to 21st-century
For a brief look at how these lessons might help your leadership game, read on….
To begin, let’s examine five key leadership lessons that I took away from my plebe (freshman) year at
Let’s get on to the lessons and their application to our high tech world:
- To learn to lead you must learn to follow
When I first heard this, I thought that it was simply an awkward attempt by power-mad upperclassmen to motivate us to “jump higher” without question – and do it joyfully in the knowledge that it would help us become admirals.
Years after that, in senior management positions here in the Valley, it’s become painfully obvious when staff members have never learned good followership. There seem to be two very common symptoms. First, they often don’t provide their boss with the information needed to make a decision on a given issue. Second, they usually don’t keep their boss informed on what they need to be successful in their jobs. The first leads to bad and/or late decisions, and the second leads to mutual frustration and often termination.
As an executive, it’s really easy to know if your team is doing good staff work – you sleep at night when they do. It’s that simple and that obvious.
- “I’ll find out, sir!”
In the language of Academy plebes, there are only five allowable responses (and one exception below):
· “Yes, sir.”
· “No, sir”
· “Aye-aye, sir” (meaning “I’ll comply with your order”)
· “No excuse, sir”; and
· “I’ll find out, sir”
Notice that “I don’t know, sir” is not in the vocabulary. In the highly structured world of the plebe, that statement would be superfluous. You are simply expected to find out, so why not just say that right off?
Ask yourself how many times is telling someone that you “don’t know” a waste of time for both of you? Wouldn’t it really be easier for all parties if you just said that you’ll find out (and maybe give an expected timetable for that discovery)? “I don’t know” can also send an implied message of “I don’t care” or “not my problem” – hardly the stuff of good leaders or followers.
Another perspective on this subject is available on the Entrepreneurship Blog.
- “…any midshipman guilty of offenses of a dishonest nature…is an individual intolerable to the Brigade….”
So wrote a young midshipman by the name of H. Ross Perot, who in 1953 was given the task of drafting what later became the Midshipmen Honor Concept.
Why is this emphasis on integrity so important? Simply put: in combat, dishonesty kills people. In peacetime, lies reduce effectiveness, erode confidence and morale, and undermine any concept of discipline.
On the whole and despite the occasional scandal, high tech startups do pretty well with obvious decisions regarding integrity. We fire people that lie or steal corporate assets. We don’t embezzle funds or use our expense accounts for personnel betterment. And we don’t out-and-out misrepresent facts in our statements.
But how many times have you heard (or used yourself) the phrases “spin this for the Board” or “err on the side of confidence” or “everybody fudges their download statistics”? Under what circumstances are these phrases appropriate?
It’s easy to make the right decisions in situations where conventions or norms exist to guide behavior. However, it is in the grey areas where one’s integrity is truly tested.
- Don’t ‘bilge’ your classmates [teammates]
The Academy uses this bizarre communications construct to teach a vital lesson – in the breach, you’ll live or die by your team.
Here’s how it goes in typical usage:
· Upperclassman (UC): “Where is your roommate?”
· Plebe (PL): No response
· UC: “I said WHERE IS HE?”
· PL: “Request permission not to bilge [blame] my classmate, sir?”
· UC: “Granted”
· PL: “He’s in the Activity Room creating a storefront in Second Life.”
The idea here is to train in the reflex of thinking before you say anything that hurts a teammate, and therefore weakens team coherence.
Today, I learn a lot about this concept by watching professional sports on TV. In particular, I watch the post-game interviews. What will LA Lakers star Kobe Bryant, who measures his support like a fine brandy, say about his teammates’ contributions after a game in which he scores 52 points? What did former Steelers Coach Bill Cowher, the epitome of team ethos, say when talented young quarterback Ben Roethlisberger makes a fool of himself on an overpowered motorcycle?
At our startups, it’s vital that we coach team members to speak honestly about situations without assigning blame. Here are some suggestions:
· Praise in public, reprimand in private.
· If something negative needs to be voiced about a team member, invite them into the conversation.
· The Navy Strike Fighter Tactics Instructor School (AKA “Topgun”) teaches pilots to always debrief in the third person – e.g., “…the Red Fighter turned hard across the Blue Fighter’s tail…” – even when those pilots are in the room. This has been found to keep emotion out of the discussion, thereby promoting free exchange.
Open, direct and constructive communication is always appropriate.
- The top motivator for heroic acts
This brings us to our final, and most important lesson.
I had the great privilege of learning directing from one of this country’s great heroes – VADM Jim Stockdale. What an inspiration, and what a role model for an aspiring aviator. (Note: Stockdale’s
This is the guy that won the Medal of Honor and four Silver Stars, devised the “tap code” for fellow inmates while interred as a POW for 7 years during the Vietnam War at the infamous “Hanoi Hilton,” and he deliberatively disfigured himself with a razor so that his captures could not use him in a planned television propaganda appearance. Read the links….
I just couldn’t let the other boys down. It was unthinkable. They needed me. We needed each other. The other Medal winners that I’ve asked said similar things…we did it for our team.
Not our Country. Not family. Not the Navy. Team.
You can see more of Bob’s writing here, and see his bio here.
10 Comments
-
Joe said:
This is a very simplistic formula driven set of rules for “good management”. Basically assume a lack of intellect, discourse and questioning.
If your team does not question or challenge you - you are a bad ceo, and if your people lie, cheat or cannot deliver or do spin, then as a ceo you have hired the wrong people and the ceo is at fault.
If you ask a question of a subordinate ” will thsi product attain a 30% market share” and he says “I don’t know or I am not certain or I am not sure” It is acceptable and right/ If some one tells me “he is going to find out” that is the biggest bunch of bs I would have heard.
However, if the question is “how confident are you of attaining a 30% share, which is what you are forecasting”, I expect an honest answer not some bs to go find out exactly 100% or 0%
This is technology - not selling the next razor or shampoo or kleenex extensions.
-
Paul said:
Bob, you missed the best academy—the U.S. Coast Guard Academy.
As a CEO of a tech startup and a USCGA grad, I hope you will realize that the smallest, yet strongest service creates leaders who jump into the business world with passion and energy!
Keep up the great writing! -Paul -
Bob Walters said:
Thanks for the comments.
As you might expect, I’ve received A LOT of private emails from the “other” academies. I gotta say, it took willpower even to mention West Point by name.
BTW, I can’t recall a single time that I’ve asked someone in my startups whether we’d reach 30% market share. I do recall asking whether there is a market at all! If the answer was “I don’t know,” I took that as a bad sign.
Come to think of it, I don’t recall ever asking my F/A-18 wingman whether there was a 30% chance that a bogey was on our tail….
Peace,
> Bob
-
christopher michel said:
well said, shipmate!
-
Mel Meinhardt said:
Thank you for this concise list.
I’ve been part of and “led” high tech teams and corporate teams. In all cases, those people that could live the lessons you describe were the best additions to team success.
The examples you describe are necessarily military in nature (It’s the context of the article, of course.), nevertheless the principles are true everywhere. The military environment merely contains numerous crystaline examples where one’s personal behavior makes a clear and immediate difference.
Smaller tech start-ups or projects have similar consequences.
Posted next to my office light switch is my only “rule” for teammates…”Don’t keep quiet.
What we’re doing hasn’t been done before, and we’re all required to work together to succeed.”
I’ll add your five.
Thanks.
MelMel Meinhardt, USNA ‘80
-
tomo said:
@Joe,
You seem to have missed the point. Bob said those five rules were what he learned during his first year in the Academy and are the foundation to building and instilling a team and team thinking.
In your example the only true answer is or at least should begin with, “I don’t know”, because it’s impossible to know unless you can travel through time. Do you think Scott McNealy asked a subordinate at Sun whether opensource had a 30% chance of a chance of negatively impacting future adoption and sales of Solaris? I don’t know for sure, but I would venture the answer is yes and the subordinates answer was(on the 18th green), “No. Nice putt.”
-
Daniel said:
I have to say, that I could not agree with you in 100% regarding Leadership – Annapolis style, but it’s just my opinion, which could be wrong :)
-
visit said:
I finally decided to give you a little feedback ! well you got it! i love your site !!! no , really, its good…
-
limewire said:
Hi, there!..ea4ea2103b3916767425792cfb40697a
-
ASHLYN said:
Gone Dolally
One Trackback
10:09 pm
untangling the future… » Blog Archive » Leadership - Annapolis Style said:
[...] those interested in leadership, military trivia, or both - here is a piece that I did for Matt at [...]