Updated again: To clarify paid membership vs. free access.
Updated: To clarify confusion about certification process at Thefunded, and to include Ignite’s response.
TheFunded, the controversial Web site designed to let entrepreneurs rate venture capitalists, says it is finally winning over cooperation from many VC firms.
It says some 50 firms, from Draper Fisher Jurvetson, Mohr Davidow Ventures to NEA have submitted key facts about their firms for entrepreneurs to review. These are called “certified profiles.” However, some VCs remain critical, and refuse to play. Also, it’s not clear whether Thefunded’s certified profiles are really “certified.” Take, for example, Steve Payne, from the Ignite Group. He apparently has a certified profile here). Yet, this morning, Thefunded sent out the contents of email it said had received from Payne after he was asked to “update” this certified profile: “Thanks, but no thanks,” he responded. “I’ve already been slammed anonymously in a review, with no ability to respond.”
We previously reported the criticism from Howard Hartenbaum of Draper Richards. Thefunded still does not let VCs respond to comments on their own profiles (it does lets VCs comment on other profiles). Moreover, it doesn’t let VCs comment on the unfunded (entrepreneurs), something Hartenbaum has suggested to make it fairer. Finally, it doesn’t let VCs read the juicy comments that entrepreneurs write and designate as “private,” and which only members can access. VCs aren’t allowed to become members. Membership is free for all CEOs and founders. Entrepreneur “advisors” and “lower level managers” can pay for access.
Here are the things contained in a certified profile:
Estimated Closing Time of a Funding
Fund Position in a Round (Lead, Follow, etc.)
Fund Description
Fund Special Investment Criteria
Detailed Display of the Fund Numerical Reviews
Partner Contacts with their Specialty and Blogs
Reference Deals with the Lead Partner, Highlights, and Terms
See the list of approved certified profiles.
Thefunded includes Ignite under its checked and approved certified profiles because Payne’s firm submitted initial information about itself. However, while Thefunded was fact-checking that profile before final approval and publishing, a user wrote a negative comment about Payne on the firm. That’s what made Payne withdraw from the process, according to TheFunded’s founder, who declines to reveal his name. You’ll see that the Ignite profile (screenshot below) carries little public information; it is kept private for paying members. We’ve tried to contact Payne about this, and will update if we hear back. It is odd, though, that Payne contributed a profile without knowing that people would review his firm.
Update II: Payne has since responded. He says he didn’t submit the profile for certification, but that someone else at his firm may have. Moreover, said he liked the concept of what Thefunded is trying to do, but that the implementation “has issues” — something he told Thefunded in his email.
Update III: Some VCs are telling us they feel forced to play along, fearing a hit job if they don’t.
See our disclosure on our last story about how we feel conflicted about this story.

3 Comments
-
jeremy cohen said:
I dont know why you call this controversial. Do you know how much time VCs waste for a entrepreneur. Much needed forum for founders, every system needs checks and balances. VC is middleman it is neither their money, idea nor hardwork their motto should be service to entrepreneur. Even publicly traded company’s CEOs shudder at their arrogance. What do you think they will do to founder who is working 16 hours a day. May be 10-20% are really good.
Please dont dilute the value of this site with your controverial comments.
-
Jung Kwag said:
Hmm instead of trying to change the fundamental nature of thefunded…well if certain VC’s feel that the entire process is unfair…..
doesn’t that provide opportunity? A reverse review site? Where the VC’s review startups or entrepeneurs they have come across?
Features to rate would be:
* the level of illogical reasoning and unreality of the business plan
* the Me-too factor or lack of differential advantage
* the complete lack of market factor
* Market adoption hinderance level
* Dependence or Domino factor
* Management internal turmoil factor
* lack of personnel factor
* Inhumane working conditions factorand so on….
-
done bookmakers said:
Nice site and fine content
3 Trackbacks
9:52 am
TheFunded and Avvo - Calling Plays from the Same Playbook | Charles Hudson’s Weblog said:
[...] reading about the class action lawsuit against Avvo, the lawyer rating site, and Matt Marshall’s post on TheFunded earlier today, it feels to me like both of these companies are calling plays from the same playbook [...]
9:46 pm
Startup Dunia - Indian startups and Entrepreneurship How to find the right VC ? said:
[...] If you still have doubts about why partnering with the right VC is crucial, read this and this. [...]
12:55 pm
VentureBeat » TheFunded further embraces VCs, but Sequoia still hazed said:
[...] recent move to let VCs respond to public comments was inspired by Draper Richards’ Howard Hartenbaum, who pushed TheFunded to introduce the feature, says TheFunded’s founder, who says he wants to remain anonymous for now, but lets us call [...]