<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thefunded continues to divide and conquer VC firms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/27/thefunded-continues-to-divide-and-conquer-vc-firms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/27/thefunded-continues-to-divide-and-conquer-vc-firms/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:37:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: done bookmakers</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/27/thefunded-continues-to-divide-and-conquer-vc-firms/comment-page-1/#comment-603444</link>
		<dc:creator>done bookmakers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/27/thefunded-continues-to-divide-and-conquer-vc-firms/#comment-603444</guid>
		<description>Nice site and fine content</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice site and fine content</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VentureBeat &#187; TheFunded further embraces VCs, but Sequoia still hazed</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/27/thefunded-continues-to-divide-and-conquer-vc-firms/comment-page-1/#comment-596752</link>
		<dc:creator>VentureBeat &#187; TheFunded further embraces VCs, but Sequoia still hazed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/27/thefunded-continues-to-divide-and-conquer-vc-firms/#comment-596752</guid>
		<description>[...] recent move to let VCs respond to public comments was inspired by Draper Richards&#8217; Howard Hartenbaum, who pushed TheFunded to introduce the feature, says TheFunded&#8217;s founder, who says he wants to remain anonymous for now, but lets us call [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent move to let VCs respond to public comments was inspired by Draper Richards&#8217; Howard Hartenbaum, who pushed TheFunded to introduce the feature, says TheFunded&#8217;s founder, who says he wants to remain anonymous for now, but lets us call [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Startup Dunia - Indian startups and Entrepreneurship How to find the right VC ?</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/27/thefunded-continues-to-divide-and-conquer-vc-firms/comment-page-1/#comment-511058</link>
		<dc:creator>Startup Dunia - Indian startups and Entrepreneurship How to find the right VC ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 04:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/27/thefunded-continues-to-divide-and-conquer-vc-firms/#comment-511058</guid>
		<description>[...] If you still have doubts about why partnering with the right VC is crucial, read this and this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you still have doubts about why partnering with the right VC is crucial, read this and this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jung Kwag</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/27/thefunded-continues-to-divide-and-conquer-vc-firms/comment-page-1/#comment-380689</link>
		<dc:creator>Jung Kwag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 02:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/27/thefunded-continues-to-divide-and-conquer-vc-firms/#comment-380689</guid>
		<description>Hmm instead of trying to change the fundamental nature of thefunded...well if certain VC&#039;s feel that the entire process is unfair.....

doesn&#039;t that provide opportunity? A reverse review site? Where the VC&#039;s review startups or entrepeneurs they have come across?

Features to rate would be:
* the level of illogical reasoning and unreality of the business plan
* the Me-too factor or lack of differential advantage 
* the complete lack of market factor
* Market adoption hinderance level
* Dependence or Domino factor
* Management internal turmoil factor
* lack of personnel factor
* Inhumane working conditions factor

 and so on....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm instead of trying to change the fundamental nature of thefunded&#8230;well if certain VC&#8217;s feel that the entire process is unfair&#8230;..</p>
<p>doesn&#8217;t that provide opportunity? A reverse review site? Where the VC&#8217;s review startups or entrepeneurs they have come across?</p>
<p>Features to rate would be:<br />
* the level of illogical reasoning and unreality of the business plan<br />
* the Me-too factor or lack of differential advantage<br />
* the complete lack of market factor<br />
* Market adoption hinderance level<br />
* Dependence or Domino factor<br />
* Management internal turmoil factor<br />
* lack of personnel factor<br />
* Inhumane working conditions factor</p>
<p> and so on&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy cohen</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/27/thefunded-continues-to-divide-and-conquer-vc-firms/comment-page-1/#comment-357527</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/27/thefunded-continues-to-divide-and-conquer-vc-firms/#comment-357527</guid>
		<description>I dont know why you call this controversial. Do you know how much time VCs waste for a entrepreneur. Much needed forum for founders, every system needs checks and balances. VC is middleman it is neither their money, idea nor hardwork their motto should be service to entrepreneur. Even publicly traded company&#039;s CEOs shudder at their arrogance. What do you think they will do to founder who is working 16 hours a day. May be 10-20% are really good. 

Please dont dilute the value of this site with your controverial comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know why you call this controversial. Do you know how much time VCs waste for a entrepreneur. Much needed forum for founders, every system needs checks and balances. VC is middleman it is neither their money, idea nor hardwork their motto should be service to entrepreneur. Even publicly traded company&#8217;s CEOs shudder at their arrogance. What do you think they will do to founder who is working 16 hours a day. May be 10-20% are really good. </p>
<p>Please dont dilute the value of this site with your controverial comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheFunded and Avvo - Calling Plays from the Same Playbook &#124; Charles Hudson&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/27/thefunded-continues-to-divide-and-conquer-vc-firms/comment-page-1/#comment-357329</link>
		<dc:creator>TheFunded and Avvo - Calling Plays from the Same Playbook &#124; Charles Hudson&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/27/thefunded-continues-to-divide-and-conquer-vc-firms/#comment-357329</guid>
		<description>[...] reading about the class action lawsuit against Avvo, the lawyer rating site, and Matt Marshall&#8217;s post on TheFunded earlier today, it feels to me like both of these companies are calling plays from the same playbook [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading about the class action lawsuit against Avvo, the lawyer rating site, and Matt Marshall&#8217;s post on TheFunded earlier today, it feels to me like both of these companies are calling plays from the same playbook [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
