<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google squelches Sharogle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Startup Signal - Today&#8217;s Top Blog Posts on Entrepreneurship - Powered by SocialRank</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/comment-page-1/#comment-558308</link>
		<dc:creator>Startup Signal - Today&#8217;s Top Blog Posts on Entrepreneurship - Powered by SocialRank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 10:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/#comment-558308</guid>
		<description>[...] VentureBeat &#187; Google squelches Sharogle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VentureBeat &raquo; Google squelches Sharogle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tips</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/comment-page-1/#comment-544700</link>
		<dc:creator>tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/#comment-544700</guid>
		<description>Perfect site :-) I will recommend it to all my friends and fans</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect site <img src='http://venturebeat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I will recommend it to all my friends and fans</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharogle Loses Rev-Share Opportunity with Google &#124; Tekjuice.com</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/comment-page-1/#comment-381685</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharogle Loses Rev-Share Opportunity with Google &#124; Tekjuice.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/#comment-381685</guid>
		<description>[...] [via] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speaker City &#187; links for 2007-07-19</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/comment-page-1/#comment-379759</link>
		<dc:creator>Speaker City &#187; links for 2007-07-19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/#comment-379759</guid>
		<description>[...] VentureBeat » Google squelches Sharogle Google squelches Sharogle (tags: google search) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VentureBeat » Google squelches Sharogle Google squelches Sharogle (tags: google search) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zilpho</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/comment-page-1/#comment-377473</link>
		<dc:creator>zilpho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/#comment-377473</guid>
		<description>Chris says &quot;All Sharogle was doing was rotate Adsense for search and keep 50% of the rotations for themselves. Their argument that people who use and make search engines successful must get a cut out of it does not make much sense.&quot;

Because?

Chris says: &quot;In the end it is the Advertiser who loses. If Sharogle wants to provide a search experience. it can merely redirect their site to Google. Everyone knows where to go to search something.&quot;

And how would they generate income for their users? What would be the reason to even have a website that is directing all searches to a site that evereyone already knows about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris says &#8220;All Sharogle was doing was rotate Adsense for search and keep 50% of the rotations for themselves. Their argument that people who use and make search engines successful must get a cut out of it does not make much sense.&#8221;</p>
<p>Because?</p>
<p>Chris says: &#8220;In the end it is the Advertiser who loses. If Sharogle wants to provide a search experience. it can merely redirect their site to Google. Everyone knows where to go to search something.&#8221;</p>
<p>And how would they generate income for their users? What would be the reason to even have a website that is directing all searches to a site that evereyone already knows about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/comment-page-1/#comment-377460</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/#comment-377460</guid>
		<description>Just because one has a comment does not justify their rationality.

All Sharogle was doing was rotate Adsense for search and keep 50% of the rotations for themselves. Their argument that people who use and make search engines successful must get a cut out of it does not make much sense.

Their operation clearly gives a user to click on someone else&#039;s Adsense for search to earn credits.

In the end it is the Advertiser who loses. If Sharogle wants to provide a search experience. it can merely redirect their site to Google. Everyone knows where to go to search something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because one has a comment does not justify their rationality.</p>
<p>All Sharogle was doing was rotate Adsense for search and keep 50% of the rotations for themselves. Their argument that people who use and make search engines successful must get a cut out of it does not make much sense.</p>
<p>Their operation clearly gives a user to click on someone else&#8217;s Adsense for search to earn credits.</p>
<p>In the end it is the Advertiser who loses. If Sharogle wants to provide a search experience. it can merely redirect their site to Google. Everyone knows where to go to search something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zilpho</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/comment-page-1/#comment-377440</link>
		<dc:creator>zilpho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/#comment-377440</guid>
		<description>Ben,

You were not clicking on your own ads, in fact when you made a search you had no idea whose ads were showing up.

Eric said &quot;Google has killed a valiant effort by a company that wanted to let you partake of Google’s profits.&quot;

I think you should rephrase this statement because the site is not dead. As far as I know they are forming new partnerships to make it work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,</p>
<p>You were not clicking on your own ads, in fact when you made a search you had no idea whose ads were showing up.</p>
<p>Eric said &#8220;Google has killed a valiant effort by a company that wanted to let you partake of Google’s profits.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you should rephrase this statement because the site is not dead. As far as I know they are forming new partnerships to make it work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molly</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/comment-page-1/#comment-377430</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/#comment-377430</guid>
		<description>@ben baker
The users wouldn&#039;t get paid more if they clicked on ads, because they weren&#039;t their own ads being displayed. No user sees their own ads.

Also, sharogle is relaunching using a different paid search engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ben baker<br />
The users wouldn&#8217;t get paid more if they clicked on ads, because they weren&#8217;t their own ads being displayed. No user sees their own ads.</p>
<p>Also, sharogle is relaunching using a different paid search engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Baker</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/comment-page-1/#comment-377415</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/#comment-377415</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t this be an incentive for Users to commit click fraud??

Duh????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t this be an incentive for Users to commit click fraud??</p>
<p>Duh????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology News Daily</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/comment-page-1/#comment-377226</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology News Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/#comment-377226</guid>
		<description>[...] [via] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proxieslist.net</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/comment-page-1/#comment-377040</link>
		<dc:creator>proxieslist.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/#comment-377040</guid>
		<description>[...] [via] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharogle Loses Rev-Share Opportunity with Google</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/comment-page-1/#comment-377028</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharogle Loses Rev-Share Opportunity with Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/#comment-377028</guid>
		<description>[...] [via]   Link to This Post: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via]   Link to This Post: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zilpho</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/comment-page-1/#comment-376858</link>
		<dc:creator>zilpho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/#comment-376858</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

If it was dumb why did they become so popular One (1) month after launch? I don&#039;t think you understood the idea. What they did with google was they rotated your adsense account so when members search you stand a chance of receiving clicks on your ads. It was in fact a smart idea, however google decided that it was against their adsense policy and blocked ads from the site. Sources said that google didn&#039;t like the &quot;incentive to search&quot; idea, but makes me wonder how companies like blingo.com are still able to use google search since they offer incentives to search big time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>If it was dumb why did they become so popular One (1) month after launch? I don&#8217;t think you understood the idea. What they did with google was they rotated your adsense account so when members search you stand a chance of receiving clicks on your ads. It was in fact a smart idea, however google decided that it was against their adsense policy and blocked ads from the site. Sources said that google didn&#8217;t like the &#8220;incentive to search&#8221; idea, but makes me wonder how companies like blingo.com are still able to use google search since they offer incentives to search big time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/comment-page-1/#comment-376839</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/17/google-squelches-sharogle/#comment-376839</guid>
		<description>this could be the dumbest thing I have ever seen. If you want to make some of the google profits why not just sign up for an adsense account and not have to share it with a third party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this could be the dumbest thing I have ever seen. If you want to make some of the google profits why not just sign up for an adsense account and not have to share it with a third party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
