<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google vs. Microsoft in healthcare records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/14/google-vs-microsoft-in-healthcare-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/14/google-vs-microsoft-in-healthcare-records/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:36:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David P. Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/14/google-vs-microsoft-in-healthcare-records/comment-page-1/#comment-449990</link>
		<dc:creator>David P. Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/14/google-vs-microsoft-in-healthcare-records/#comment-449990</guid>
		<description>EMR guy, you raise an excellent point. I could imagine this playing out in a few different ways. If lots of people start putting their information into Google Health and then insisting that their doctors find ways to access it, that could conceivably create an incentive for physician practices to digitize. I think that&#039;s kind of a big if -- I&#039;m not sure what, exactly, patients are going to value in EMRs if they can&#039;t take them to their doctors to begin with, and the privacy concerns still loom pretty large.

Meanwhile, as I&#039;ve said a number of times, any effort to push doctors into the Internet Age needs to grapple with the fact that it&#039;s going to cost them more to digitize their practices than they&#039;ll save, at least in the short run. It&#039;s a nifty catch-22, in fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EMR guy, you raise an excellent point. I could imagine this playing out in a few different ways. If lots of people start putting their information into Google Health and then insisting that their doctors find ways to access it, that could conceivably create an incentive for physician practices to digitize. I think that&#8217;s kind of a big if &#8212; I&#8217;m not sure what, exactly, patients are going to value in EMRs if they can&#8217;t take them to their doctors to begin with, and the privacy concerns still loom pretty large.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, as I&#8217;ve said a number of times, any effort to push doctors into the Internet Age needs to grapple with the fact that it&#8217;s going to cost them more to digitize their practices than they&#8217;ll save, at least in the short run. It&#8217;s a nifty catch-22, in fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electronic Medical Records Guy</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/14/google-vs-microsoft-in-healthcare-records/comment-page-1/#comment-448926</link>
		<dc:creator>Electronic Medical Records Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/14/google-vs-microsoft-in-healthcare-records/#comment-448926</guid>
		<description>What good is a Google Personal Health Record (or any other personal health record, for that matter) if the vast majority of physicians are still practicing medicine with paper and a pencil?  Should we first focus on helping doctors transition to electronic medical records, and then spend our time helping patients create personal health records?  Or do you think millions of personal health records will force physicians to implement an EMR?  In the end, any personal health record needs to &quot;talk&quot; to all the electronic medical record systems out there!

EMR Software Guy,
http://www.electronic-medical-record.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What good is a Google Personal Health Record (or any other personal health record, for that matter) if the vast majority of physicians are still practicing medicine with paper and a pencil?  Should we first focus on helping doctors transition to electronic medical records, and then spend our time helping patients create personal health records?  Or do you think millions of personal health records will force physicians to implement an EMR?  In the end, any personal health record needs to &#8220;talk&#8221; to all the electronic medical record systems out there!</p>
<p>EMR Software Guy,<br />
<a href="http://www.electronic-medical-record.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.electronic-medical-record.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Health care roils search engine rankings &#124; ZDNet Healthcare &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/14/google-vs-microsoft-in-healthcare-records/comment-page-1/#comment-438188</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Health care roils search engine rankings &#124; ZDNet Healthcare &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/14/google-vs-microsoft-in-healthcare-records/#comment-438188</guid>
		<description>[...] Big Two are taking different approaches. Microsoft is trying to capitalize on its existing strength in hospital computing and medical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Big Two are taking different approaches. Microsoft is trying to capitalize on its existing strength in hospital computing and medical [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VentureBeat &#187; Review of a preview: Google Health</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/14/google-vs-microsoft-in-healthcare-records/comment-page-1/#comment-433526</link>
		<dc:creator>VentureBeat &#187; Review of a preview: Google Health</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 02:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/14/google-vs-microsoft-in-healthcare-records/#comment-433526</guid>
		<description>[...] sooner does the NYT run a significant piece on health-info efforts at Google and Microsoft than someone decides to leak the &#8220;preview&#8221; of the site to Google Blogoscoped. (Site [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sooner does the NYT run a significant piece on health-info efforts at Google and Microsoft than someone decides to leak the &#8220;preview&#8221; of the site to Google Blogoscoped. (Site [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VentureBeat &#187; Google Health coming, lets you manage your records online</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/14/google-vs-microsoft-in-healthcare-records/comment-page-1/#comment-431930</link>
		<dc:creator>VentureBeat &#187; Google Health coming, lets you manage your records online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 22:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/14/google-vs-microsoft-in-healthcare-records/#comment-431930</guid>
		<description>[...] woke up and started pushing their weight around. At VentureBeat LifeSciences, David Hamilton looks at the rivalry between Google and Microsoft, and how the biggest opportunity is in letting people manage their health records [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] woke up and started pushing their weight around. At VentureBeat LifeSciences, David Hamilton looks at the rivalry between Google and Microsoft, and how the biggest opportunity is in letting people manage their health records [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
