<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DocuSign, for electronic signatures, raises $12.4M</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:59:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/comment-page-1/#comment-830859</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/#comment-830859</guid>
		<description>John: Huh? Your link is worthless, probably like the &quot;company&quot; behind it. Never heard of them...

Billy: The founder didn&#039;t bail out -- he was axed after a new ceo was brought in.  It&#039;s been a desperate attempt to fix a broken company with an &quot;anybody can replicate&quot; technology that they cannot even protect with a patent. I&#039;d guess they won&#039;t be along much longer, especially as the economy tightens and people want real solutions instead of toys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: Huh? Your link is worthless, probably like the &#8220;company&#8221; behind it. Never heard of them&#8230;</p>
<p>Billy: The founder didn&#8217;t bail out &#8212; he was axed after a new ceo was brought in.  It&#8217;s been a desperate attempt to fix a broken company with an &#8220;anybody can replicate&#8221; technology that they cannot even protect with a patent. I&#8217;d guess they won&#8217;t be along much longer, especially as the economy tightens and people want real solutions instead of toys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/comment-page-1/#comment-819185</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/#comment-819185</guid>
		<description>another competitor is SigneDocs www.signedocs.com which offers a much better solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another competitor is SigneDocs <a href="http://www.signedocs.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.signedocs.com</a> which offers a much better solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy McPherson</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/comment-page-1/#comment-790358</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy McPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/#comment-790358</guid>
		<description>Are they still in business?  I guess a bad attitude can raise money, but even the founder bailed out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are they still in business?  I guess a bad attitude can raise money, but even the founder bailed out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VentureBeat &#187; Roundup: CNET sells Webshots, Comcast not alone, fundings and more</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/comment-page-1/#comment-595716</link>
		<dc:creator>VentureBeat &#187; Roundup: CNET sells Webshots, Comcast not alone, fundings and more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 22:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/#comment-595716</guid>
		<description>[...] raised $9.5 million.  EchoSign takes $6 million for signature automation &#8212; A month ago today, we reported that competitor DocuSign had taken $12.4 million to continue developing its electronic signature [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] raised $9.5 million.  EchoSign takes $6 million for signature automation &#8212; A month ago today, we reported that competitor DocuSign had taken $12.4 million to continue developing its electronic signature [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Morrison</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/comment-page-1/#comment-595198</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/#comment-595198</guid>
		<description>Jeffrey: I meant to say what I said, &quot;legally binding&quot;. It&#039;s not a certainty that your average web signature, from checking a &quot;I agree&quot; box to putting in initials, would hold up in court -- Act or no. Thus, these companies exist, to do the extra work required.

David: Thanks for mentioning your company.

Chris: Echosign is mentioned above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey: I meant to say what I said, &#8220;legally binding&#8221;. It&#8217;s not a certainty that your average web signature, from checking a &#8220;I agree&#8221; box to putting in initials, would hold up in court &#8212; Act or no. Thus, these companies exist, to do the extra work required.</p>
<p>David: Thanks for mentioning your company.</p>
<p>Chris: Echosign is mentioned above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Sun</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/comment-page-1/#comment-552162</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/#comment-552162</guid>
		<description>Another competitor in the space is EchoSign.  Echosign has been doing well, particularly through their deep Salesforce integration (via ApEx)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another competitor in the space is EchoSign.  Echosign has been doing well, particularly through their deep Salesforce integration (via ApEx)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wall</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/comment-page-1/#comment-551868</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/#comment-551868</guid>
		<description>Our congratulations to DocuSign for getting more cash from investors to help them grow and perhaps generate revenues that eventually may sustain the company.

Please note that Yozons, with its Signed &amp; Secured and eSignForms products, is a competitor who has been in business since 2000 and has a fast growing business with significant customers (Enterprise, Citrix, Pitney Bowes, several universities and Comcast among a long list of smaller businesses), many of whom selected Yozons over DocuSign.

You also failed to mention that alamode&#039;s SureDocs is a direct competitor in the print-to-sign electronic signature space and has a fixed annual price that is dramatically less than what DocuSign offers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our congratulations to DocuSign for getting more cash from investors to help them grow and perhaps generate revenues that eventually may sustain the company.</p>
<p>Please note that Yozons, with its Signed &amp; Secured and eSignForms products, is a competitor who has been in business since 2000 and has a fast growing business with significant customers (Enterprise, Citrix, Pitney Bowes, several universities and Comcast among a long list of smaller businesses), many of whom selected Yozons over DocuSign.</p>
<p>You also failed to mention that alamode&#8217;s SureDocs is a direct competitor in the print-to-sign electronic signature space and has a fixed annual price that is dramatically less than what DocuSign offers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey McManus</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/comment-page-1/#comment-551854</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey McManus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/25/docusign-for-electronic-signatures-raises-124m/#comment-551854</guid>
		<description>Chris, an electronic signature is indeed a &quot;legal&quot; signature and has been under federal law for seven years now. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Signatures_in_Global_and_National_Commerce_Act

What you probably meant to say was a &quot;paper&quot; signature which has persisted mainly for cultural reasons rather than legal reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, an electronic signature is indeed a &#8220;legal&#8221; signature and has been under federal law for seven years now. See: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Signatures_in_Global_and_National_Commerce_Act" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Signatures_in_Global_and_National_Commerce_Act</a></p>
<p>What you probably meant to say was a &#8220;paper&#8221; signature which has persisted mainly for cultural reasons rather than legal reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
