<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DivShare says it&#8217;s for sale but not dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:28:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VentureBeat &#187; Box.net offers easy storage, amid increasing competition</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-748568</link>
		<dc:creator>VentureBeat &#187; Box.net offers easy storage, amid increasing competition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/#comment-748568</guid>
		<description>[...] online. Not to mention the host of smaller competitors that focus more directly on online storage: Divshare (which is free ), MyFabrik (which recently raised $24.9 million), SoonR and a bunch of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] online. Not to mention the host of smaller competitors that focus more directly on online storage: Divshare (which is free ), MyFabrik (which recently raised $24.9 million), SoonR and a bunch of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: André Felipe</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-718300</link>
		<dc:creator>André Felipe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/#comment-718300</guid>
		<description>Thank you, VentureBeat. I was worried about what was happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, VentureBeat. I was worried about what was happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hhhzzz</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-708262</link>
		<dc:creator>hhhzzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/#comment-708262</guid>
		<description>wait, so ask him why NONE of the dvishare files are now accessible? just google site:divshare.com and a random keyword. all divshare files as of right now not avaliable anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait, so ask him why NONE of the dvishare files are now accessible? just google site:divshare.com and a random keyword. all divshare files as of right now not avaliable anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Web Forums an OK Way to Sell? teasered @ Feed UP !!</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-660620</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Web Forums an OK Way to Sell? teasered @ Feed UP !!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/#comment-660620</guid>
		<description>[...] Dan Kaplan over at Venture Beat asked Altschul why he went this route. Altschul&#8217;s explanations are a bit fuzzy. (Like: &#8220;the sale was originally intended to be private.&#8221; On a web forum?) He also claims the company is profitable, that they&#8217;re just trying to maximize value with this method of sale, and that his move is misunderstood. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dan Kaplan over at Venture Beat asked Altschul why he went this route. Altschul&#8217;s explanations are a bit fuzzy. (Like: &#8220;the sale was originally intended to be private.&#8221; On a web forum?) He also claims the company is profitable, that they&#8217;re just trying to maximize value with this method of sale, and that his move is misunderstood. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VentureBeat &#187; Roundup: Verizon, Gdrive, and more</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-653158</link>
		<dc:creator>VentureBeat &#187; Roundup: Verizon, Gdrive, and more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/#comment-653158</guid>
		<description>[...] Journal reports. This apparently means it will compete against file-hosting startups like Box.net, Divshare and many others. Google&#8217;s online email service, Gmail, has been steadily increasing its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Journal reports. This apparently means it will compete against file-hosting startups like Box.net, Divshare and many others. Google&#8217;s online email service, Gmail, has been steadily increasing its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VentureBeat &#187; Roundup: Verizon, Gdrive, and more</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-653172</link>
		<dc:creator>VentureBeat &#187; Roundup: Verizon, Gdrive, and more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/#comment-653172</guid>
		<description>[...] Journal reports. This apparently means it will compete against file-hosting startups like Box.net, Divshare and many others. Google&#8217;s online email service, Gmail, has been steadily increasing its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Journal reports. This apparently means it will compete against file-hosting startups like Box.net, Divshare and many others. Google&#8217;s online email service, Gmail, has been steadily increasing its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-650288</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/#comment-650288</guid>
		<description>Still hard to believe they are selling so suddenly.  I think box.net should pick them up as they are already spending loads on affiliate and ppc -- they could gain much needed traffic from an acquisition the size of divshare.com .  In the meantime, a great alternative to divshare.com is http://www.filebam.com and also http://www.zshare.net .  Anyway, good luck with the sale David and team and look forward to your next project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still hard to believe they are selling so suddenly.  I think box.net should pick them up as they are already spending loads on affiliate and ppc &#8212; they could gain much needed traffic from an acquisition the size of divshare.com .  In the meantime, a great alternative to divshare.com is <a href="http://www.filebam.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.filebam.com</a> and also <a href="http://www.zshare.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.zshare.net</a> .  Anyway, good luck with the sale David and team and look forward to your next project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Web Forums an OK Way to Sell? &#171; FoundRead</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-650064</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Web Forums an OK Way to Sell? &#171; FoundRead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/#comment-650064</guid>
		<description>[...] founder David Altschul does next very seriously based on how this situation is being handled. Dan Kaplan over at Venture Beat asked Altschul why he went this route. Altschul&#8217;s explanations are a bit fuzzy. (Like: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] founder David Altschul does next very seriously based on how this situation is being handled. Dan Kaplan over at Venture Beat asked Altschul why he went this route. Altschul&#8217;s explanations are a bit fuzzy. (Like: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DivShare Not Headed to the Deadpool</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-649504</link>
		<dc:creator>DivShare Not Headed to the Deadpool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/#comment-649504</guid>
		<description>[...] VentureBeat sat down with DivShare co-founder David Altschul and asked him a few questions that clear up why they&#8217;re for sale and if there are any potential buyers. According to Altschul, they&#8217;re for sale because &#8220;we feel the product is complete, and we want to find a company that can help support its growth and keep ahead of it, which has been our problem for a little while now.&#160; We&#8217;ve talked to investors that are interested, but now there&#8217;s other projects we want to pursue and make sure DivShare has a proper home first.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VentureBeat sat down with DivShare co-founder David Altschul and asked him a few questions that clear up why they&#8217;re for sale and if there are any potential buyers. According to Altschul, they&#8217;re for sale because &#8220;we feel the product is complete, and we want to find a company that can help support its growth and keep ahead of it, which has been our problem for a little while now.&nbsp; We&#8217;ve talked to investors that are interested, but now there&#8217;s other projects we want to pursue and make sure DivShare has a proper home first.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DivShare Says “Not Dead At All.” So Why Sell?</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-648762</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DivShare Says “Not Dead At All.” So Why Sell?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/#comment-648762</guid>
		<description>[...] as Venturebeat  reports, DivShare is stating the opposite as the truth behind its decision, saying that the company [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Venturebeat  reports, DivShare is stating the opposite as the truth behind its decision, saying that the company [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DivShare Says &#8220;Not Dead At All.&#8221; So Why Sell?</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-648748</link>
		<dc:creator>DivShare Says &#8220;Not Dead At All.&#8221; So Why Sell?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/divshare-says-its-for-sale-but-not-dead/#comment-648748</guid>
		<description>[...] as Venturebeat  reports, DivShare is stating the opposite as the truth behind its decision, saying that the company [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Venturebeat  reports, DivShare is stating the opposite as the truth behind its decision, saying that the company [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
