<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poking Facebook &#8212; missing code, disagreements still hang over the company</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Facebook to settle with ConnectU &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/comment-page-1/#comment-802166</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook to settle with ConnectU &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/#comment-802166</guid>
		<description>[...] Zuckerberg to light &#8212; some of them casting doubt on his ingenuity and originality, like the disappearance of Facebook&#8217;s early code base (which was supposed to be a key part of Facebook&#8217;s defense), others just plain awkward and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Zuckerberg to light &#8212; some of them casting doubt on his ingenuity and originality, like the disappearance of Facebook&#8217;s early code base (which was supposed to be a key part of Facebook&#8217;s defense), others just plain awkward and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VentureBeat &#187; Facebook moves to force magazine to take down documents</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/comment-page-1/#comment-658506</link>
		<dc:creator>VentureBeat &#187; Facebook moves to force magazine to take down documents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/#comment-658506</guid>
		<description>[...] week, 02138 published an in-depth article, which we wrote about here. &#8220;We filed the motions to let the court know that its orders were being violated,&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, 02138 published an in-depth article, which we wrote about here. &#8220;We filed the motions to let the court know that its orders were being violated,&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/comment-page-1/#comment-655398</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/#comment-655398</guid>
		<description>The picture from the article tells the story:
http://www.02138mag.com/asset/1065.jpg

These are the guys suing Zuckerberg. Ivy League competitve rowers who can&#039;t/won&#039;t write code.

Put yourself in Mark&#039;s shoes. You&#039;re a geeky kid who learned to code, maybe reads Slashdot and are looking to do something cool on the web. These jocks notice a thing you made and say they want your help with their company. You get excited and agree.

You&#039;ve spent lots of time on the web and have developed a very good sense of what a good website is, and as you look over their idea, you realize that this it is a start, but that you could do better. You wouldn&#039;t use the site they drew up, but with some tweaks and a good UI, it has potential.

What do you do? Maybe you could go back to them and tell them how it could be done right.

Maybe you feel like they don&#039;t have the touch and you do, so you don&#039;t feel any obligation to fix their project, and instead opt to make your own.

Maybe they&#039;re arrogant pricks who wouldn&#039;t listen to you, and your sense of things is that if they don&#039;t know how to code, tough shit for them. I have no idea of course, but a few things jump out:

They&#039;re ivy league jocks supported by their dad.
They sunk $800,000 into the project through a web development firm (wow! where&#039;d they get that? Why didn&#039;t they do that to start with? Somehow I doubt Zuckerberg would have done this)

If this were a movie, they look the part of the guy that has everything, has no trouble getting laid, and gives Zuck a swirlie.

None of that proves anything but it does kind of fit an image, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The picture from the article tells the story:<br />
<a href="http://www.02138mag.com/asset/1065.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.02138mag.com/asset/1065.jpg</a></p>
<p>These are the guys suing Zuckerberg. Ivy League competitve rowers who can&#8217;t/won&#8217;t write code.</p>
<p>Put yourself in Mark&#8217;s shoes. You&#8217;re a geeky kid who learned to code, maybe reads Slashdot and are looking to do something cool on the web. These jocks notice a thing you made and say they want your help with their company. You get excited and agree.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve spent lots of time on the web and have developed a very good sense of what a good website is, and as you look over their idea, you realize that this it is a start, but that you could do better. You wouldn&#8217;t use the site they drew up, but with some tweaks and a good UI, it has potential.</p>
<p>What do you do? Maybe you could go back to them and tell them how it could be done right.</p>
<p>Maybe you feel like they don&#8217;t have the touch and you do, so you don&#8217;t feel any obligation to fix their project, and instead opt to make your own.</p>
<p>Maybe they&#8217;re arrogant pricks who wouldn&#8217;t listen to you, and your sense of things is that if they don&#8217;t know how to code, tough shit for them. I have no idea of course, but a few things jump out:</p>
<p>They&#8217;re ivy league jocks supported by their dad.<br />
They sunk $800,000 into the project through a web development firm (wow! where&#8217;d they get that? Why didn&#8217;t they do that to start with? Somehow I doubt Zuckerberg would have done this)</p>
<p>If this were a movie, they look the part of the guy that has everything, has no trouble getting laid, and gives Zuck a swirlie.</p>
<p>None of that proves anything but it does kind of fit an image, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Mark Zuckerberg Steal the Code for Facebook? - The Unofficial Facebook Blog</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/comment-page-1/#comment-654768</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Mark Zuckerberg Steal the Code for Facebook? - The Unofficial Facebook Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/#comment-654768</guid>
		<description>[...] between Facebook and ConnectU. The details paint a new picture of Mark Zuckerberg. As Matt Marshall points out, the article brings to light conflicting statements by Mark [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] between Facebook and ConnectU. The details paint a new picture of Mark Zuckerberg. As Matt Marshall points out, the article brings to light conflicting statements by Mark [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELS</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/comment-page-1/#comment-652542</link>
		<dc:creator>ELS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/#comment-652542</guid>
		<description>The code base (circa 2004) is not what has made facebook successful. 

The concept that &quot;the idea&quot; was defensible IP is laughable.

This case is going nowhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The code base (circa 2004) is not what has made facebook successful. </p>
<p>The concept that &#8220;the idea&#8221; was defensible IP is laughable.</p>
<p>This case is going nowhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLoughlin</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/comment-page-1/#comment-652500</link>
		<dc:creator>JLoughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/#comment-652500</guid>
		<description>If he is the habitual backstabber that the article alleges, then his fate is inescapable.  He will be held to his own rules.  &quot;Et tu, Brute?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he is the habitual backstabber that the article alleges, then his fate is inescapable.  He will be held to his own rules.  &#8220;Et tu, Brute?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Smith</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/comment-page-1/#comment-652388</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/#comment-652388</guid>
		<description>This is suspect, especially in light of the previous accusations. The old saying is &quot;where there&#039;s fire, there&#039;s smoke&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is suspect, especially in light of the previous accusations. The old saying is &#8220;where there&#8217;s fire, there&#8217;s smoke&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaronontheweb</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/comment-page-1/#comment-651632</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaronontheweb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/26/poking-facebook-missing-code-disagreements-still-hang-over-the-company/#comment-651632</guid>
		<description>I know people in the web 2.0 community are often hesitant to criticize the respective buzz leader but I&#039;m just going to say it: Zuckerberg is an unethical, lying sack of shit. There&#039;s way too much dirt on this guy just to dismiss it as sour grapes on the behalf of parties that missed out. The guy is scum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know people in the web 2.0 community are often hesitant to criticize the respective buzz leader but I&#8217;m just going to say it: Zuckerberg is an unethical, lying sack of shit. There&#8217;s way too much dirt on this guy just to dismiss it as sour grapes on the behalf of parties that missed out. The guy is scum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
