<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sendori, monetizing domain names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:33:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ofer (from Sendori)</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-816324</link>
		<dc:creator>Ofer (from Sendori)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/#comment-816324</guid>
		<description>Referring to VisitorBid as being similar to Sendori is like saying that Google when it started was just another search engine and therefore non-unique. What made Google unique and what makes Sendori unique is the implementation and approach taken.

VisitorBid.com failed because it did not make it easy for advertisers to bid on domain traffic. Advertisers did not have the time of day to pick individual domains to bid on.

At Sendori we were able to grow our market because we let advertisers use the keyword lists (and bulk sheets) that they use within CPC networks. The keywords are then used to match domains.

Plus, VisitorBid used client-side redirects which is technically a bad way to approach the problem.

Also at Sendori we created APIs for both domainers and advertisers that helped us scale the market dramatically.  There are many other innovations we&#039;ve created which I can&#039;t detail here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Referring to VisitorBid as being similar to Sendori is like saying that Google when it started was just another search engine and therefore non-unique. What made Google unique and what makes Sendori unique is the implementation and approach taken.</p>
<p>VisitorBid.com failed because it did not make it easy for advertisers to bid on domain traffic. Advertisers did not have the time of day to pick individual domains to bid on.</p>
<p>At Sendori we were able to grow our market because we let advertisers use the keyword lists (and bulk sheets) that they use within CPC networks. The keywords are then used to match domains.</p>
<p>Plus, VisitorBid used client-side redirects which is technically a bad way to approach the problem.</p>
<p>Also at Sendori we created APIs for both domainers and advertisers that helped us scale the market dramatically.  There are many other innovations we&#8217;ve created which I can&#8217;t detail here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-661488</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 03:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/#comment-661488</guid>
		<description>Nothing new, just a different name for an old service. This is the same business model advertising.com created years ago with their service to bid for domain traffic &quot;visitorbid.com&quot;.

Check this old link http://www.bidvisitor.com/faq.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing new, just a different name for an old service. This is the same business model advertising.com created years ago with their service to bid for domain traffic &#8220;visitorbid.com&#8221;.</p>
<p>Check this old link <a href="http://www.bidvisitor.com/faq.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bidvisitor.com/faq.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domineros - 4</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-661376</link>
		<dc:creator>Domineros - 4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/#comment-661376</guid>
		<description>[...] de Dell (parte I) (Por Domisfera) - Los dominios .com son los más consultados (Por Adseok) - Sendori, monetizing domain names (Por VentureBeat)  Diciembre 02nd 2007 Posted to Blogs, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de Dell (parte I) (Por Domisfera) &#8211; Los dominios .com son los más consultados (Por Adseok) &#8211; Sendori, monetizing domain names (Por VentureBeat)  Diciembre 02nd 2007 Posted to Blogs, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sendori raises funding from First Round Capital, Baseline Ventures and Maples Investments &#187; Domain Name News</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-654698</link>
		<dc:creator>Sendori raises funding from First Round Capital, Baseline Ventures and Maples Investments &#187; Domain Name News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/#comment-654698</guid>
		<description>[...] also profiled in Venture Beat this week, has quietly raised funding from First Round Capital, Baseline Ventures, and Maples Investments. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also profiled in Venture Beat this week, has quietly raised funding from First Round Capital, Baseline Ventures, and Maples Investments. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ulevitch</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-653424</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ulevitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/#comment-653424</guid>
		<description>John,

Happy to hear your an OpenDNS user.  We correct most typos like that, though we don&#039;t correct that one.  You&#039;ll note we do provide a spelling correction for it on the page of results, highlighted in red.

At somepoint, it&#039;ll be typo&#039;d enough that we&#039;ll figure it out and it&#039;ll be automatically corrected just like nytimes.xom and 1000&#039;s of other typos are corrected too.  My gut tells me not too many folks type nytimes.xim which is why our system doesn&#039;t auto-correct it, but instead just provides the choice.

And our search results are just like Yahoo&#039;s and Google&#039;s, organic on the main area, and sponsored on the right and sometimes in the top rail.

And, wildcarding a user&#039;s typo is entirely different from registering random generic domains and putting up ads.  It&#039;s not illegal, but it&#039;s certainly a poor end-user experience and annoying.

People use us because they have a choice -- people don&#039;t have a choice (right now) with domain parking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Happy to hear your an OpenDNS user.  We correct most typos like that, though we don&#8217;t correct that one.  You&#8217;ll note we do provide a spelling correction for it on the page of results, highlighted in red.</p>
<p>At somepoint, it&#8217;ll be typo&#8217;d enough that we&#8217;ll figure it out and it&#8217;ll be automatically corrected just like nytimes.xom and 1000&#8217;s of other typos are corrected too.  My gut tells me not too many folks type nytimes.xim which is why our system doesn&#8217;t auto-correct it, but instead just provides the choice.</p>
<p>And our search results are just like Yahoo&#8217;s and Google&#8217;s, organic on the main area, and sponsored on the right and sometimes in the top rail.</p>
<p>And, wildcarding a user&#8217;s typo is entirely different from registering random generic domains and putting up ads.  It&#8217;s not illegal, but it&#8217;s certainly a poor end-user experience and annoying.</p>
<p>People use us because they have a choice &#8212; people don&#8217;t have a choice (right now) with domain parking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john n.</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-653368</link>
		<dc:creator>john n.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/#comment-653368</guid>
		<description>&quot;While I’m not a fan of parked domains in general&quot;

WOW this coming from someone (open DNS) who serves up yahoo ads on address bar typeos.  How  is that is any different than a parked domain name serving the exact same ads (even the same source - yahoo) as parked domains??

I am an open DNS user, but think it is a bit hypocritical of you to say you don&#039;t like parking, when your company serves up the same thing.

Example:

As an openDNS user, if i type in nytimes.xim by accident, i get ads by Open DNS.

So you are saying that parking pages are no good, but monetizing typos to the right of the dot are OK?  Cmon.

I hope Ny Times IP attorneys don&#039;t see this because you are serving up competitors&#039; ads on their trademark, Dave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;While I’m not a fan of parked domains in general&#8221;</p>
<p>WOW this coming from someone (open DNS) who serves up yahoo ads on address bar typeos.  How  is that is any different than a parked domain name serving the exact same ads (even the same source &#8211; yahoo) as parked domains??</p>
<p>I am an open DNS user, but think it is a bit hypocritical of you to say you don&#8217;t like parking, when your company serves up the same thing.</p>
<p>Example:</p>
<p>As an openDNS user, if i type in nytimes.xim by accident, i get ads by Open DNS.</p>
<p>So you are saying that parking pages are no good, but monetizing typos to the right of the dot are OK?  Cmon.</p>
<p>I hope Ny Times IP attorneys don&#8217;t see this because you are serving up competitors&#8217; ads on their trademark, Dave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ulevitch</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-653298</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ulevitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/27/sendori-monetizing-domain-names/#comment-653298</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;m not a fan of parked domains in general, I think what Sendori is offering to the domain parking business can actually create a better experience for websurfers. Immediately taking users to useful content-rich site that (ideally) has what they want, instead of a lame page of ads is a good thing.  It&#039;s why we offer users things like OpenDNS Shortcuts (which are like AOL Keywords that users setup and control).

I support anything that delivers a better navigational experience to users and this could do that.  This assumes, of course, that Sendori is restrictive in who they allow to advertise and redirect domains on their service.  If someone redirects videogames.com to malware.badguys.rbn.ru then that&#039;d obviously be a bad thing.

I look forward to finding out more.

-David (from OpenDNS)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m not a fan of parked domains in general, I think what Sendori is offering to the domain parking business can actually create a better experience for websurfers. Immediately taking users to useful content-rich site that (ideally) has what they want, instead of a lame page of ads is a good thing.  It&#8217;s why we offer users things like OpenDNS Shortcuts (which are like AOL Keywords that users setup and control).</p>
<p>I support anything that delivers a better navigational experience to users and this could do that.  This assumes, of course, that Sendori is restrictive in who they allow to advertise and redirect domains on their service.  If someone redirects videogames.com to malware.badguys.rbn.ru then that&#8217;d obviously be a bad thing.</p>
<p>I look forward to finding out more.</p>
<p>-David (from OpenDNS)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
