nanosolar.jpgSome five years after its founding, and a year and a half after announcing a huge solar cell factory in the Bay Area, Nanosolar has become one of the very first companies to begin commercially selling thin-film solar cells.

Nanosolar’s cells use an “ink” thin enough to be painted onto a flexible backing. The company isn’t alone in making these CIGS cells, so-called because of the conductor compound they use (copper, indium, gallium, diselenide). However, it may have one of the cheapest ways of making them.

Much of the excitement over Nanosolar is because of the price for the cells — which the company says is as low as 99 cents per watt, low enough to be competitive with traditional energy sources. While plenty of other companies have claimed to be able to manufacture for similarly low prices, they’re not actually producing cells yet.

Nanosolar’s first commercial client is Beck Energy, which will build a one-megawatt installation in East Germany, near the company’s other factory.

Although a single megawatt isn’t much — only about enough to power 400 homes — most solar installations so far have been small. For example, an 8.22 megawatt installation just completed by SunEdison in Colorado will be one of the largest.

However, Nanosolar’s factories have the capacity to pump out well over 100 megawatts of cells each year. The company may just be proving that solar power is ready to enter the big-time.

nanosolar2.jpg

Tags:
Trackback URL

4 Trackbacks

  1. VentureBeat » Solar CIGS production to pick up — HelioVolt building plant in Austin said:

    [...] day after Nanosolar revealed that it has begun manufacturing and sales of its solar cells, rival copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) solar cell maker [...]

  2. VentureBeat » Solel takes whopping $105M investment for solar thermal said:

    [...] bring down costs over the next few years. For more on some recent moves in solar, see our posts on CIGS manufacturer Nanosolar starting production, and Ausra’s production plant in Nevada. Tagged co:solel, deal, inv:Ecofin [...]

  3. MIT spin-out aims to make silicon-based solar competitive with coal by 2012 » VentureBeat said:

    [...] companies that make thin-film cells like First Solar (NASDAQ: FSLR) and Nanosolar (coverage here) are working on their own process improvements, and it’s difficult to tell when breakthroughs [...]

  4. April 2nd, 2008
    10:18 am

    Nanosolar gets yet more funding for production — next up, an IPO? » VentureBeat said:

    [...] that wants it to churn out cells more quickly. Nanosolar’s cells, which the company only started producing in December, are among the cheapest on the market, which is reason enough for the company to continue [...]

2 Comments

  1. RC said:

    While cost per watt for the cell itself may be cheaper than the alternate solar technology it fails to take into account the add space requirements. At 1/3 the efficiency of high end solar cells the installation area and manpower will be increased by 60%. This will certainly add to the cost of an installation and is by no means trivial.

  2. July 11th, 2008
    10:47 am

    Joe said:

    re: installation costs (RC); I’d imagine unrolling a thin film panel to be substantially cheaper than installing brittle silicon panels. Just a thought.

Add a Comment