LongJump’s new Web database

longjump.jpgLongJump, a Sunnyvale, Calif. company is the latest company offering a simple “database as a service” product, following on the heels of similar services announced by Amazon (see its S3/SimpleDB service ).

These services help Web companies to simplify the process of managing and operating applications, and represent a big trend in technology these days.

LongJump goes a step beyond what Amazon and others offer by letting developers not only access a database from multiple interfaces (Excel, MS Access, etc), but also to manage workflow on top of it — something you can’t do with other services.

It’s just the latest product in a wave of new start-ups offering “Web services,” things that were previously performed by IT professionals, but which now can be farmed out to companies like LongJump. Major parts of the technology world are being automated like this. We just wrote about Engine Yard this morning (before, you’d have to hire engineers to manage your Rails application, now you outsource it to Engine Yard.)

In comparison to Amazon’s service, LongJump’s relational database further encapsulates objects within its database, so that they can be worked with more easily. For example, LongJump lets you do things like search for relationships, i.e, letting you show all products in your database that are say, related to a sports (or category = sports). In Amazon’s case, you have call up data about your products, and do the search analysis yourself or with some other product. A range of other database or related services, from DabbleDB, Coghead and Zoho also don’t let you manage workflow. [Update: We were wrong about Coghead. Coghead does allow this, though its offering requires a little more knowledge on the part of its users to do so.]

LongJump’s product is web-based. LongJump is also joining the trend toward open platforms. It uses a simple XML server. It offers a REST-based API, so that developers can build their own applications using LongJump. It also offers storage.

We got a demo Monday from Pankaj Malviya’s, 37, chief executive of LongJump parent company, Relationals. The interface is pretty smooth.

Malviya, a former employee at Veritas, has bootstrapped the Relationals since 2003, and now has $5 million in annual revenue, and is profitable. Only now, he tells us, is he ready to consider taking venture capital to expand.

He started several years ago selling a customer relations management (CRM) product to media companies (MediaNews, owner of the the San Jose Mercury News, Gannett, McClatchy are all customers). Now he says its time to build out the product, and LongJump is his effort to sell to penetrate small and medium sized businesses. Whereas Salesforce costs $120 per month per user, his product so far has costs $20 per month per user (more for LongJump; see below).

According to the company:
–LongJump’s API also supports both Simple Object Access Protocol message responses over HTTP/HTTPS and custom Java-bean scripting within its built-in data policy engine.
–LongJump’s DaaS is a fully managed infrastructure and administered relational database architecture that includes: SAS 70 Type II data protection compliance, enterprise-level security, flexible access and control, real-time mirrored database replication, and 99.999% application uptime.
–With LongJump’s DaaS service, a user simply maps out their data structure and then plugs it into their LongJump account.
–LongJump provides a suite of interconnected applications for business functions, which provide better integration and similar functionality to larger application providers but at a more affordable price while still having the ability to scale as a business grows.
–LongJump, with access to its REST-based API included, costs $24.95 per user per month, or $19.95 per user per month with a 12-month commitment.

Next Story: Life sciences briefing: Friday, Jan. 11, 2008
Previous Story: Last tickets for the Crunchies go on sale

Bookmark and Share

Tags: ,

Photo of Matt Marshall

About the Author, Matt Marshall

Matt Marshall is editor and CEO of VentureBeat. Follow him on Twitter at @mmarshall, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • As the creator and owner of a venture capital database, I'm always interested to see the new stuff coming out.

    In my experience, I've found that the most important aspect about databases is to understand what your users want most, it isn't so much the guts of creating it, though from the sound of it, LongJump may be doing a good job on the nuts and bolts side, though I wonder if that will become a commodity business quickly.

    My other thought is that the comparison between LongJump and Salesforce is a bit problematic. Salesforce is not only a database for end users, but also a platform for developers to integrate their applications and sell directly to end users. Also, the price point of SF reflects the fact that each user gets a dedicated representative (for whatever that's worth). The $20/mo price point doesn't support that - it is a true 'self-service' model.

    Lastly, I've tried the Zoho's of the world, and their reliability is questionable. The only online service that is reliable enough for me is Google, and even then I drum my fingers sometimes. To perform important database routines reliably requires major data center resources, IMHO.
  • "A range of other database or related services, from DabbleDB, Coghead and Zoho, also don’t let you manage workflow."

    Matt, not true. Coghead has an embedded BPEL engine. This allows you do create very powerful process and workflow in your apps. Its what makes Coghead a true application platform rather than just a simple database builder.
  • Zoho offers two services - Zoho Creator that focuses on creating DB-based applications, and Zoho DB & Reports which focuses on querying and reporting. Creator does offer a full-fledged scripting/workflow engine, while DB offers SQL.

    These two are being integrated so that data created from an app in Creator can be reported on using the DB/Reports.

    Don, have you tried Zoho specifically? We would love to know which service you tried and encountered reliability issues. We have invested heavily in infrastructure (both hardware & software) to make Zoho a service users can depend on.

    Thank you.
    Sridhar Vembu
    CEO
    AdventNet/Zoho
  • Sridhar - I tried your spreadsheet app. I liked the presentation of it and migrated some files over. In a few days I stopped - too much waiting for updating...
  • Paul, thanks, and apologies. I've updated.
  • Paul McNamara
    Matt, no worries, thanks for taking the time to do an update.

    P.S., we just launched Coghead 2.0 today!
  • I am evaluating Salesforce.com and others including Longjumpp as the platform to build 21stCenturyCollege.com. This will be a SaaS company addressing the desparate needs of higher education. What I see from my experience working with Salesforce is that they are having to transform their CRM culture to a platform company. The mindset - as expressed by Marc Benioff- to reshape their business model is not reaching the front lines. My experience is limited but instincts tells me that Marc is struggling to turn the ship around. A younger company with fresh and hungry minds may be able to set the service side of the platform than a company as large as Salesforce. But I am thrilled with the potential for reshaping information technology in higher education, before legacy thinking kills it.