updated
metaweb.jpgMetaweb Technologies, the San Francisco company developing an open shared database called Freebase to store and edit the world’s information, has just gotten a big boost from Benchmark Capital and Goldman Sachs.

The two firms have invested in a $42.4 million second round of capital for the company, VentureBeat has learned. The company could not be reached for comment. A partner at Benchmark was reached, but he declined comment. [Update: Benchmark followed up Tuesday confirming the news.] This follows a $15 million investment two years ago. Besides Benchmark, the earlier investors also include Millennium Technology Ventures and Omidyar Network.

The investment is considerable, and comes at a time when a number of experts are betting that a more powerful, “semantic” Web is about to emerge, where data about information is much more structured than it is today. People are still waiting for the “killer app” that will exploit this new sort of web, but it’s generally believed that a database such as Freebase or Twine will be needed for this to happen.

[Update: I should clarify: Twine is not so much a database as it is an application. But the linking of data -- through relationships -- is similar, and thus the easy confusion. Conceivably, Twine could use the Freebase database, and is thus complimentary. See comments below. Twine's Nova Spivack says it best: "Twine is more like a semantic Facebook, and Metaweb is more like a semantic Wikipedia." Metaweb is a content repository and Twine is an app that uses content for specific purposes.]

VentureBeat writer Chris Morrison once described Twine:

Let’s dumb this down to a very concrete example. In Twine, I might be identified as “Chris Morrison,” and then labeled with the markers “writer,” “venturebeat,” “male,” “technology,” “charming” and “good-looking” (all true, of course). Twine would set me apart from the many other Chris Morrisons running around.

Both Freebase and Twine have drawn considerable hype (see coverage when Freebase was announced last year). Freebase is essentially building a Wikipedia-like database, but with much more power. While volunteers are madly writing up entries on Wikipedia — and very good one at that — there’s no system on Wikipedia that can tell the functional relationship between two related pages — i.e., something telling it “here are all the entries about males who are good-looking and who write about technology.” Freebase has the ability to do that.

Here’s a video tour of how it works. Freebase categorizes knowledge according to thousands of “types” of information, such as film, director or city. Those are the highest order of categorization. Then underneath those types you have “topics,” which are individual examples of the types — such as Annie Hall and Woody Allen. It boasts two million topics to date. This lets Freebase represent information in a structured way, to support queries from web developers wanting to build applications around them. It also solicits people to contribute their knowledge to the database, governed by a community of editors. It offers a Creative Commons license so that it can be used to power applications, on an open API.

Search is an example of an application it can make more powerful. See the screenshots below, which show you the example of a search at Freebase for the word Manhattan. Freebase lets you further specify that you’re looking for a film, as opposed to a location, and it rearranges the results accordingly — something you can’t do with Google.

layton.jpgFreebase “knows” Woody Allen is an director, and then knows other directors. It also knows Allen’s place of birth, and it can take you to that city, where you can find other people born there, and so on. Everything is connected.

MetaWeb is run by Thomas Layton (pictured here), who became CEO last year, after he left another Benchmark company, OpenTable.

freebase-screen.jpg

freebase-screen2.jpg

freebase-screen3.jpg

Tags: , , , , ,
Trackback URL

17 Trackbacks

  1. MetaWeb Raises Another $42M in Venture Capital « Kevin Burton’s NEW FeedBlog said:

    [...] 14, 2008 in web2.0 MetaWeb has raised another $42M in Venture Capital, which makes for a total of $57M in VC funding since the company launched: The two firms have invested in a $42.4 million second round of capital for the company, [...]

  2. MetaWeb receives $42M investment « Data Strategy said:

    [...] Collection, People and Data, Search — chucklam @ 2:45 am VentureBeat just reported that MetaWeb Technologies received a $42.4M second round investment. I haven’t had time to fully play around with its Freebase database yet, but they certainly [...]

  3. Metaweb Gets $42 Million; There’s Hope Yet For Semantic Web said:

    [...] [via VentureBeat] Link to This Post: [...]

  4. Freebase Takes $42 Million said:

    [...] database company Freebase has taken $42 Million in a round that included Benchmark Capital and Goldman Sachs. Total funding to date is $57 [...]

  5. The Freebase Blog » Blog Archive » Metaweb receives $42.5 in funding said:

    [...] news is out! As you might have seen else-blog, Metaweb recently received $42.5 million in B round venture [...]

  6. TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ » Freebase、$42Mを調達 said:

    [...] オンラインデータベース企業Freebaseは$42M(4200万ドル)を調達。今ラウンドにはBenchmark CapitalとGoldman Sachsも参加。調達総額は$57M(5700万ドル)。 [...]

  7. Freebase Takes $42 Million: tech product reviews, tech news, daily videos, free downloads, and podcasts, tech, products, computer, mp3 players, cell phones, digital cameras said:

    [...] camera, mobiles, Blogroll, gadget, news, Uncategorized Online database company Freebase has taken $42 Million in a round that included Benchmark Capital and Goldman Sachs. Total funding to date is $57 [...]

  8. Freebase Takes $42 Million : New Web 2.0 Magazine said:

    [...] database company Freebase has taken $42 Million in a round that included Benchmark Capital and Goldman Sachs. Total funding to date is $57 [...]

  9. Metaweb millions « Mike Love’s blog said:

    [...] data and search Congrats to my friends at Metaweb.  They just got $42.4 million in their second round of capital.  In other news, they’re working on a new, cleaner [...]

  10. » Massive second round of funding for Freebase - $42 Million Web 2.0 Money: The Money & Business Behind the Web 2.0 Innovations said:

    [...] an investor in Twine has quickly reacted on the comparison between the two Freebase and Twine the VentureBeat’s Matt Marshall [...]

  11. Shared database MetaWeb gets $42M boost « The “Meta” Internet: The genesis of a “virtual” Silicon Valleys leveraging the power of the Internet. said:

    [...] 21, 2008 by identityandconsulting Digg thisBookmark this Print version Email story Sphere [...]

  12. Q&A with John Doerr « The “Meta” Internet: The genesis of a “virtual” Silicon Valleys leveraging the power of the Internet. said:

    [...] this comment useful to you ? VentureBeat » Shared database MetaWeb gets $42M boost   01.14.08 | 9:34 pm […] investment is considerable, and comes at a time when a number of [...]

  13. VentureBeat » Franz, seeking funding, wants to become the foundation for a “semantic web.” said:

    [...] That trend has continued into this year with fundings. The semantic database Metaweb got a giant $42 million round, stealth Israeli company SemantiNet just received $1.7 million, and we’re hearing rumors of [...]

  14. VentureBeat » Questia founder moves on to stealth semantic startup PeoplePad said:

    [...] separates PeoplePad from a company like Metaweb (coverage here), which is working on indexing the entire Internet, but hasn’t spent any time trying to [...]

  15. Radar Networks receives new funding for Twine » VentureBeat said:

    [...] heard from our own sources that the investment is probably in the $15-$20 million range (no giant, Metaweb-style $40+ million fundings [...]

  16. March 11th, 2008
    12:10 pm

    Over $100m in 12 months backs natural language for the semantic web « Commercial Intelligence said:

    [...] Networks’ CEO and founder, Nova Spivack, has been quoted as [...]

  17. March 26th, 2008
    10:43 am

    ONTOBLOGIA » Archivo del weblog » Twine. Primeras sensaciones said:

    [...] pueden revolucionar la concepción de las redes sociales en la WWW en los próximos meses. Y no sólo por las inversiones que están consiguiendo, sino por el planteamiento revolucionario de sus objetivos. La filosofía de las dos es similar: [...]

4 Comments

  1. Saumil Mehta said:

    Any idea how Freebase is doing so far? I played around with the site a few months ago; it was most certainly fun and interesting but I wasn’t seeing any ahas from a consumer standpoint. Thoughts on the actual service?

  2. Peter Rip said:

    Matt:

    As an investor in Twine, allow me correct you about Twine and Metaweb’s positioning. You correctly point out that Metaweb is building a database about concepts and things on the Web. Twine is not. Twine is really more of an application than a database. It is a way for persons to share information about their interests. So they are complementary, not competitive.

    What’s most important is that Twine will be able to use all the structure in something like Metaweb (and other content sources) to enrich the user’s ability to track and manage information. Think of Metaweb as a content repository and Twine as as the app that uses content for specific purposes.

    Twine is still in closed beta. So the confusion is understandable, especially with all the hype surrounding the category.

  3. Nova Spivack said:

    Freebase and Twine are not competitive. That should be corrected in the above article. In fact our products are very different and have different audiences. Twine is for helping people and groups share knowledge around their interests and activities. It is for managing personal and group knowledge, and ultimately for building smarter communities of interest and smarter teams.

    Metaweb, by contrast, is a data source that Twine can use, but is not focused on individuals or on groups. Rather Metaweb is building a single public information database, that is similar to the Wikipedia in some respects. This is a major difference in focus and functionality. To use an analogy, Twine is more like a semantic Facebook, and Metaweb is more like a semantic Wikipedia.

  4. Matt Marshall said:

    Peter and Nova, thanks for the comments, and clarification. Am updating…

  5. Kingsley idehen said:

    Freebase is closer to DBpedia [1]. That said, Freebase and DBpedia are somewhat complimentary, and potentially extremely complimentary should Freebase adopt Linked Data best practices [2].

    One thing about the Semantic Web is that is that Ray Noorda’s Co-opetion will be the norm. Due to the nature of Linked Data you will find that mutual inclusive will reign without adversely affecting growth potential of Semantic Web companies that subscribe to the Linked Data best practice.

    Links:
    1 http://dbpedia.org
    2.http://linkeddata.org

Add a Comment