<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook changes invite process for apps &#8212; latest step in refining the platform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/02/13/facebook-changes-invite-process-for-apps-latest-step-in-refining-the-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/02/13/facebook-changes-invite-process-for-apps-latest-step-in-refining-the-platform/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:55:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: facebook - stop bugging me and my friends &#171; Red Shoe Girl</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/02/13/facebook-changes-invite-process-for-apps-latest-step-in-refining-the-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-795717</link>
		<dc:creator>facebook - stop bugging me and my friends &#171; Red Shoe Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/02/13/facebook-changes-invite-process-for-apps-latest-step-in-refining-the-platfo/#comment-795717</guid>
		<description>[...] Just Say No group has popped up on Facebook petitioning for the ban on forced invites.  Apparently Facebook are clamping down on those developers so maybe there is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just Say No group has popped up on Facebook petitioning for the ban on forced invites.  Apparently Facebook are clamping down on those developers so maybe there is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/02/13/facebook-changes-invite-process-for-apps-latest-step-in-refining-the-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-793032</link>
		<dc:creator>william</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2008/02/13/facebook-changes-invite-process-for-apps-latest-step-in-refining-the-platfo/#comment-793032</guid>
		<description>Facebook forces developers to use a propitiatory language (fbhtml) to create there applications. Why dont they use an open source standard ?

It was not long ago that a developer would would think twice about porting there work to a closed propitiatory application (FB is not a platfrom, it is a silo)

What if FB changes the rules or the code for an application. Who loses then. The developers lose. 

The FB developer application program can only be looked at for what it is; a way to enslave developers to innovate for them....and because the used a closed language and own the rules...FB can decide that the developers ideas is good and they can decide to do it on their own....leaving the developer with nothing for their innovation....Facebook will not use open standadrs because this would keep them honest....With an Open Standards program If FB  decided to steal/kill off an application that developers had created...The application could live on and be easily ported to other applications....But FB will never do this....They are only in it to generate revenue on the backs of developers and members that are content creators</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook forces developers to use a propitiatory language (fbhtml) to create there applications. Why dont they use an open source standard ?</p>
<p>It was not long ago that a developer would would think twice about porting there work to a closed propitiatory application (FB is not a platfrom, it is a silo)</p>
<p>What if FB changes the rules or the code for an application. Who loses then. The developers lose. </p>
<p>The FB developer application program can only be looked at for what it is; a way to enslave developers to innovate for them&#8230;.and because the used a closed language and own the rules&#8230;FB can decide that the developers ideas is good and they can decide to do it on their own&#8230;.leaving the developer with nothing for their innovation&#8230;.Facebook will not use open standadrs because this would keep them honest&#8230;.With an Open Standards program If FB  decided to steal/kill off an application that developers had created&#8230;The application could live on and be easily ported to other applications&#8230;.But FB will never do this&#8230;.They are only in it to generate revenue on the backs of developers and members that are content creators</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
