Comments on: ManagedQ wants to be ‘Windows for search’

By: Online Marketing Heroes (SEO-Guide.net) · SEO Guide - Tips, Tricks and Secrets

Wed, 21 May 2008 21:30:37 +0000

[...] as adding a few nifty features. As mentioned by David Stat, the co-founder of ManagedQ (source: Venture Beat) Stat points discover that the base see interface hasn’t evolved since Google’s early [...]

By: ManageQ: Cool Interface to Manage Your Search

ManageQ: Cool Interface to Manage Your Search — Tue, 20 May 2008 19:02:38 +0000

[...] as adding a few nifty features. As mentioned by David Stat, the co-founder of ManagedQ (source: Venture Beat) Stat points out that the basic search interface hasn’t evolved since Google’s early [...]

By: Yahoo’s New Approach to Search | Seo Blog - Search Engine Optimization and How to Earn Money on Internet

Tue, 25 Mar 2008 05:05:59 +0000

[...] ManagedQ wants to be ‘Windows for search’ [via Zemanta] [...]

By: Yuri Ammosov

Yuri Ammosov — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:07:59 +0000

Yakov:

if you call your competitor a “loser”, it helps to add a disclaimer stating you own a search site that also sits atop Google (and Yandex). Seriously, this is appalling. You should learn to be less jealous to other’s success. I for one would love to know what other companies out there do Google Android as their primary business, but so far, fail to find any! Looks like my only competitors are individual developers, and a bit of Motorola…

By: Anthony Ha

Anthony Ha — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:35:18 +0000

@ Yakov: I agree that beating Google seems unlikely, but I still think ManagedQ is interesting and worth writing about. Just because we cover a company doesn’t mean we guarantee they’ll succeed!

But the broader question you touch on (destination site building on Google vs. totally new search paradigm) is interesting. Instinctively, I have more faith in someone who says, “Well, we’re not going to beat Google at search per se, so how else can we get in the game?” It seems more realistic than, say, shifting paradigm as required by your company Quintura. But maybe I’m not seeing the bigger picture?

By: Yakov

Yakov — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:37:50 +0000

Antony, why do you cover them? They are all losers because none can beat Google in medium-term by building a search destination site. You know that that, don’t you? You have shift paradigm of people “think search. they think g….”.