<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s paid-click growth in March: The song remains the same?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/15/google-march-paid-click-growth-the-song-remains-the-same/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/15/google-march-paid-click-growth-the-song-remains-the-same/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:59:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lai Yan How</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/15/google-march-paid-click-growth-the-song-remains-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-813730</link>
		<dc:creator>Lai Yan How</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 04:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91049#comment-813730</guid>
		<description>paid click get a lot of money!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paid click get a lot of money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The surge is working &#8212; at least for Google&#8217;s stock &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/15/google-march-paid-click-growth-the-song-remains-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-804664</link>
		<dc:creator>The surge is working &#8212; at least for Google&#8217;s stock &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91049#comment-804664</guid>
		<description>[...] ago that suggested the company&#8217;s paid-click growth in the U.S. would be a weak 1.8 percent (our coverage). The actual global number was 20 percent, with 10 percent in the U.S. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ago that suggested the company&#8217;s paid-click growth in the U.S. would be a weak 1.8 percent (our coverage). The actual global number was 20 percent, with 10 percent in the U.S. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/15/google-march-paid-click-growth-the-song-remains-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-804419</link>
		<dc:creator>VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91049#comment-804419</guid>
		<description>[...] in international markets and paid-click numbers that proved the speculators wrong (as we have suggested multiple [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in international markets and paid-click numbers that proved the speculators wrong (as we have suggested multiple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google stock soars on solid earnings news &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/15/google-march-paid-click-growth-the-song-remains-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-804405</link>
		<dc:creator>Google stock soars on solid earnings news &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91049#comment-804405</guid>
		<description>[...] in international markets and paid-click numbers that proved the speculators wrong (as we have suggested multiple [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in international markets and paid-click numbers that proved the speculators wrong (as we have suggested multiple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MG Siegler</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/15/google-march-paid-click-growth-the-song-remains-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-804379</link>
		<dc:creator>MG Siegler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91049#comment-804379</guid>
		<description>@christopher - thanks for that link. interesting. I&#039;ll be on the GOOG call in about an hour. I&#039;ll let you guys know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@christopher &#8211; thanks for that link. interesting. I&#8217;ll be on the GOOG call in about an hour. I&#8217;ll let you guys know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/15/google-march-paid-click-growth-the-song-remains-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-804375</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91049#comment-804375</guid>
		<description>AdGooroo just released their quarterly research report on Google and Yahoo. It clearly shows that Google&#039;s quality algorithm cost them quite a few advertisers since July, but that they bounced back in Q1 (at Yahoo&#039;s expense). This seems to support the idea that earnings will be up. 

http://www.adgooroo.com/google_gains_advertiser_share.php

These guys normally know what they are talking about, so we will see…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AdGooroo just released their quarterly research report on Google and Yahoo. It clearly shows that Google&#8217;s quality algorithm cost them quite a few advertisers since July, but that they bounced back in Q1 (at Yahoo&#8217;s expense). This seems to support the idea that earnings will be up. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.adgooroo.com/google_gains_advertiser_share.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.adgooroo.com/google_gains_advertiser_share.php</a></p>
<p>These guys normally know what they are talking about, so we will see…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/15/google-march-paid-click-growth-the-song-remains-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-804265</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91049#comment-804265</guid>
		<description>nice page and good service you gat
keep it up
please in need you to be under web page sothat people can search for whatever they need
please help me out in other by sending me those infomation am going to use
thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice page and good service you gat<br />
keep it up<br />
please in need you to be under web page sothat people can search for whatever they need<br />
please help me out in other by sending me those infomation am going to use<br />
thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MG Siegler</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/15/google-march-paid-click-growth-the-song-remains-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-803883</link>
		<dc:creator>MG Siegler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91049#comment-803883</guid>
		<description>@chris - thanks. tomorrow&#039;s 1Q results should be interesting, but yes, long term I think Google is fine and made the right move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@chris &#8211; thanks. tomorrow&#8217;s 1Q results should be interesting, but yes, long term I think Google is fine and made the right move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lake</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/15/google-march-paid-click-growth-the-song-remains-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-803806</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=91049#comment-803806</guid>
		<description>Good analysis MG. As you say, Google reduced the clickable area on ads to reduce &#039;accidental clicks&#039;, and as such conversion rate % should have improved. Less wastage on media spend (or cost of sale, if you account for it that way).

With the recent decision to allow companies to bid on competitor trademarks keyword costs will only rise. 

I&#039;ve asked a bunch of agency people whether Adwords is plateauing and the collective answer is a definite &#039;No&#039;. Not sure the same can be said of Adsense.

c.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis MG. As you say, Google reduced the clickable area on ads to reduce &#8216;accidental clicks&#8217;, and as such conversion rate % should have improved. Less wastage on media spend (or cost of sale, if you account for it that way).</p>
<p>With the recent decision to allow companies to bid on competitor trademarks keyword costs will only rise. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve asked a bunch of agency people whether Adwords is plateauing and the collective answer is a definite &#8216;No&#8217;. Not sure the same can be said of Adsense.</p>
<p>c.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
