Comments on: More betting on visual search: SearchMe raises another $12.6M

By: abercrombie622

abercrombie622 — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:47:58 +0000

Why tiffany jewellery is your best choice?Compared with other jewellerys,tiffany jewellery have many advantages.
http://www.tiffanyjewelleryshop.co.uk

By: Search engine startup SearchMe cuts 20 percent of staff - Start-Up News | Internet Startups

Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:30:49 +0000

[...] Mountain View, Calif. company raised a $12.6 million round in May from Sequoia Capital, DAG Ventures, Deepfork Capital and Lehman Brothers Venture [...]

By: Search engine startup SearchMe makes job cuts » VentureBeat

Search engine startup SearchMe makes job cuts » VentureBeat — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:19:23 +0000

[...] Mountain View, Calif. company raised a $12.6 million round in May from Sequoia Capital, DAG Ventures, Deepfork Capital and Lehvan Brothers Venture [...]

By: loupaglia

loupaglia — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:07:14 +0000

You anonymous Disqus user! Now I have to figure out which Mike D from a long time ago your are. Are you the Mike D from Sloan or the Mike D from About? Reveal yourself.

Anyway, I don't disagree with your math, if they can capture a small share of search, there is revenue to be made. But two issues:

1. Getting to 1% in a visual search model I find to be a challenge
2. At some point, monetization model has to kick in and that means ads if they are going for share. And going to ads means having to impact the nice, smooth cover-flow design they have.

By: Tony Robertson

Tony Robertson — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:32:58 +0000

Reminds me of flowww.com

By: Mike D

Mike D — Sat, 31 May 2008 23:22:43 +0000

Yo Lou – long time amigo. While monetization is an issue, I don't think it will be their issue. They'll probably be a strict technolgoy/talent acquisition long before they start ringing the cash register. Even if they do crack the code, 1% search share != 1% seach revenue (rounds to zero $). It's all about scale.

We did some interviews/concept value test recently and presented Search Me to respondents. It proves very useful when there's a mass of low authority sites – good design correlates strongly (not perfectly) with good content. Saves a few trial and error clicks…

By: dumbfounder

dumbfounder — Sat, 31 May 2008 21:02:07 +0000

The problem is, if you grab 1% of the search market, how do you monetize it? By going to Google for ads. If Google doesn't want to deal with you, you are basically screwed. I mean, Yahoo has like 16% or whatever and they are still screwed.

By: loupaglia

loupaglia — Sat, 31 May 2008 16:54:06 +0000

agreed. i think it is neat and the visualization is nice, but it is simply a slower search tool and I do not think the return is there from Google fast results and clicking through some choices. I think it is probably a fantastic designer's search engine so you can find views of different ways people are attacking a topic from a design side.

looking ahead, I would like to know how SearchMe is going to tackle the money problem. throwing ads into their engine, even text-based, is going to really hamper that nice clean look they have going.

By: search me

search me — Sat, 31 May 2008 14:03:39 +0000

[...] taking over the search market. Not to be deterred, however, visual search company SearchMe has …http://venturebeat.com/2008/05/30/more-betting-on-visual-search-searchme-raises-another-126m/Search turns up nothing but old animal bones The CitizenStaff photo by Lizz Bottrell Team leader, [...]