LiquidPlanner helps you manage projects when things go wrong

There’s no shortage of project management software available — Microsoft Project is the most high-profile option, but the list of competing startups seems endless. Bellevue, Wash.-based LiquidPlanner is trying to stand out by offering a new approach to the most difficult part of project planning — staying on track when everything goes wrong.

The company’s key innovation is obvious but powerful — deadlines are usually inexact and need to be changed as, inevitably, things don’t go according to plan, so LiquidPlanner doesn’t take a larger project and give each task a specific deadline. Instead, team members list a range of likely completion dates. The service then uses statistical analysis to figure out when a project as a whole will probably finish, and adjusts that estimate as necessary. So if your boss thinks it will take two to four days to finish a task, but you realize it will take closer to two weeks, you can change the range of completion dates, and LiquidPlanner will adjust the estimates for related tasks accordingly.

Naturally, changing schedules mean the project’s plans and goals will need to be revised too, and LiquidPlanner also offers an easy-to-use drag-and-drop interface to make those changes. If a particular task is causing major delays, with just a few clicks a manager can move that task to later in the timeline, or delete it altogether — and again, the estimates for every related task will be adjusted, too.

Co-founder Charles Seybold gave me a demo of LiquidPlanner this morning, and it’s not a one-trick pony — the company has rounded out its key feature with other useful collaboration tools, albeit ones that are less unique.

LiquidPlanner has been in public testing since January, and the commercial version launches today. (Naturally, the company has been using the service to manage its own plans. Seybold showed me a project log revealing how his team quickly spotted problems and scaled back accordingly; despite the hiccups, the company met its launch deadline.) The service is still free for up to three users, as well as for nonprofits; it costs $35 per month for each user above that.

The company is self-financed, mainly by Seybold and his co-founder Jason Carlson. Both of them were managers at Expedia.com. Seybold also worked on Microsoft Project in the ’90s.

Next Story:
Previous Story:

Tags:

Photo of Anthony Ha

About the Author, Anthony Ha

Anthony is VentureBeat's assistant editor, as well as its reporter on enterprise technology, cloud computing, and tech policy. Before joining VentureBeat in 2008, Anthony worked at the Hollister Free Lance, where he won awards from the California Newspaper Publishers Association for breaking news coverage and writing. He attended Stanford University and now lives in San Francisco. Reach him at anthony@venturebeat.com. You can also follow Anthony on Twitter.

  • Mike
    This is a product that makes you wonder why it took so long for someone to build!

    As a long time user of MS Project - when my software development project starts slipping (inevitably) I get no help to manage priorities and assess how realistic my targets are.

    It looks like the ride is free for a small team of up to 3 people. I will be checking this one out - hope it is snappy enough to be useful - one area some web 2.0 apps are lacking at the moment - but even web apps are getting faster thanks to continuous deployment and tuning they can do...
  • Thanks Mike,

    We wondered why nobody had solved this problem either and decided we could serve the world better by making an innovative PM tool rather than another "innovative" video sharing service.

    Your point on performance is a good one. Actually building a snappy web app is quite a trick. Particularily when you are aiming to go head-to-head with desktop applications and can be dealing with thousands of tasks at a professional level of planning. For instance, we had to figure out how to make all the rescheduling asynchronious so that you could keep on editing while we crunch through all the probability curves.

    You have to approach the problem from multiple angles, the architecture, the page optimization, and the UI design. It's key to study the end-to-end activities that people do and consider the whole picture so that ultimatly, people can spend less time planning and more time doing what it is they do.

    Charles, CEO, LiquidPlanner Inc.
blog comments powered by Disqus