Venture capital: Still white, still male, but getting better (maybe)

Even though well-educated women and minorities have been entering the workforce for years, the venture capital industry is still dominated by white men. But there are a few signs that things are changing.

In a new study from the National Venture Capital Association and Dow Jones VentureWire, men outnumbered women three-to-one among the more than 500 venture capital professionals who responded. The imbalance is even worse among the VCs actually doing the investing — namely, those who identify as managing directors, managing partners, general partners, partners, venture partners and principals — where 86 percent of respondents were male, and 14 percent were female.

The survey found a similar imbalance in ethnicity. A whopping 88 percent of respondents were white, 8 percent were Asian Pacific, 2 percent were Hispanic and 1 percent was African American.

Of course, venture capital isn’t the only industry facing this problem; commentators have long bemoaned the dearth of women in tech companies, particularly at the top levels. (More than a year ago, Renkoo co-founder Joyce Park also wrote about the “hidden” gap in self-taught female software engineers.) And in the report, NVCA President Mark Heesen notes that there are signs that things are improving. For example, when you look at non-investing positions, the number of women goes up to 44 perent, and when you look at respondents with five years of experience or less, the number of whites drops to 82 percent. Those numbers aren’t great, but at least they’re better than the overall industry average, and they could foreshadow bigger shifts.

This is the NVCA’s first demographic survey, but it plans to conduct follow-ups on a regular basis, so when Heesen says, “The face of venture capital in 2020 will be much different than it is today,” we’ll be able to see if that’s true.

Some other results:

* Among professionals who have been in the industry for five years or less, 77 percent were male, 23 percent female.

* Women were most prevalent in biopharmaceuticals, where 32 percent of respondents were female, and least prevalent in the industrial/energy investment sector.

* 87 percent of respondents were born in the United States, while 5 percent were born in Asia and the Middle East, and 4 percent were born in Europe.

* 64 percent of respondents had masters degrees or Ph.D.s.

* The top universities among respondents were Harvard (12 percent), Stanford (9 percent), the University of Pennsylvania (8 percent), Duke University (5 percent) and MIT (5 percent).

Next Story: Can Pickens’ plan swing sentiment to Obama –- and cleantech?
Previous Story: Founder Diane Greene ousted from VMware as poor results announced

Bookmark and Share

Tags: ,

Photo of Anthony Ha

About the Author, Anthony Ha

Anthony is VentureBeat's assistant editor, as well as its reporter on enterprise technology, cloud computing, and tech policy. Before joining VentureBeat in 2008, Anthony worked at the Hollister Free Lance, where he won awards from the California Newspaper Publishers Association for breaking news coverage and writing. He attended Stanford University and now lives in San Francisco. Reach him at anthony@venturebeat.com. You can also follow Anthony on Twitter.

  • Gavin Newsom
    This is very timely. According to an insider with Calpers they are having internal discussions about aligning future investments into VC funds that show the same diversity that they are required to have. Not just at Calpers but other state businesses.
    Personally, I think its a great idea considering that the status quo venture guy is; male, Stanford educated with little or no operating experience:)


    Bring in some new blood!
  • Uh, thanks, "Gavin".
  • I don't think the gender differences are a problem. But then again, I'm a fan of Steven Pinker.
  • I agree that there are probably professions where there will always be more men than women (like your example of penis modeling) and vice versa, but you haven't convinced me that's the case with venture capital. Do you really think that an attraction to risk-taking behavior is the sole, or even primary, qualification for a VC? And how would you account for the similar disparity between whites and nonwhites?

    But then again, I think diversity is inherently a good thing.
  • I did think an attraction to risk-taking behavior is a pretty important quality in a VC, but you know more about the subject than I do. I haven't even met with any VC's yet. And yeah, I have nothing to say on the subject of race.

    I guess your last statement pinpoints where we disagree -- I say if some people are happier/more productive in some professions, let them be :-)

    P.S Disqus needs some UI improvements! If I make a mistake logging in, it takes me to a registration widget and I lose my comment (unless I want to end up creating a second account). This is the second time :(
  • Anthony,

    Great Article...you are the man! Keep up the good work!

    www.workless4wealth.com