<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Supreme Court says noncompete agreements are illegal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/08/california-supreme-court-says-noncompete-agreements-are-illegal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/08/california-supreme-court-says-noncompete-agreements-are-illegal/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:10:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay Parkhill</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/08/california-supreme-court-says-noncompete-agreements-are-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-861876</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Parkhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 05:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=96290#comment-861876</guid>
		<description>To be clear - the Supreme Court reaffirmed a long line of California decisions outlawing noncompete provisions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The challenge is that California is well outside the mainstream on this.  In most other states noncompetes are taken for granted.  Nation-wide businesses struggle to come up with noncompete terms that will hold up in California as well as the rest of the country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Anderson case was in the latter category- a so called &quot;narrow restraint&quot; that Anderson hoped it could slip past the California courts.  No such luck.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;California *does* allow employers to prevent former employees using the employer&#039;s confidential information in the service of a new company.  That is likely what the Tokuda/Shen case was about.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And last, please see (and support) Bijan Sabet&#039;s (&lt;a href=&quot;http://bijansabet.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bijansabet.com&lt;/a&gt;) campaign to get Massachusetts and other states to follow the California rule.  As long as we don&#039;t steal company secrets we should be able to work for whomever we want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear &#8211; the Supreme Court reaffirmed a long line of California decisions outlawing noncompete provisions.</p>
<p>The challenge is that California is well outside the mainstream on this.  In most other states noncompetes are taken for granted.  Nation-wide businesses struggle to come up with noncompete terms that will hold up in California as well as the rest of the country.</p>
<p>The Anderson case was in the latter category- a so called &#8220;narrow restraint&#8221; that Anderson hoped it could slip past the California courts.  No such luck.</p>
<p>California *does* allow employers to prevent former employees using the employer&#39;s confidential information in the service of a new company.  That is likely what the Tokuda/Shen case was about.</p>
<p>And last, please see (and support) Bijan Sabet&#39;s (<a href="http://bijansabet.com" rel="nofollow">bijansabet.com</a>) campaign to get Massachusetts and other states to follow the California rule.  As long as we don&#39;t steal company secrets we should be able to work for whomever we want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raymond</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/08/california-supreme-court-says-noncompete-agreements-are-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-824720</link>
		<dc:creator>raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=96290#comment-824720</guid>
		<description>[...] and has been since 1872. Basically, a noncompete says a company??s employees can??t work for or starhttp://venturebeat.com/2008/08/08/california-supreme-court-says-noncompete-agreements-are-illegal/Read &quot;AAA Raymond Watches - Cheap Raymond Replica Watches&quot; at concord Watches &amp;amp Wholesale concord [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and has been since 1872. Basically, a noncompete says a company??s employees can??t work for or starhttp://venturebeat.com/2008/08/08/california-supreme-court-says-noncompete-agreements-are-illegal/Read &#8220;AAA Raymond Watches &#8211; Cheap Raymond Replica Watches&#8221; at concord Watches &#38;amp Wholesale concord [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
