Economic indicators jump — but start-up headache still setting in

The index of leading economic indicators, a broad basket of data meant to predict U.S. economic activity six to nine months in the future, rose unexpectedly in September by 0.3 percent.

This good news — which beats analyst expectations that the index would decline 0.1 percent — helps quash the steady barrage of negative financial and economic news that continued to rock the stock markets last week.

The stock market jumped a little bit this morning, with the Dow and S&P gaining more than 2 percent, and the Nasdaq more than 1 percent. News that Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke is endorsing a fiscal stimulus package may have also contributed.

However, nothing short of a significant recovery is going to placate worried venture investors hoping to profit from investments in technology startups. It’s become increasingly clear they may have trouble producing acceptable profits in coming years. More on that in a sec.

The index, published by the Conference Board in New York, incorporates a variety of data. Things like real money supply, consumer expectations and interest rates were all showing positive trends. However, things like jobless claims and building permits suggested negative pressure on the economy. The Conference Board’s economists said the index’s jump suggests that the economy, while likely contracting, is not in free fall.

This is a small glimmer of hope for startups and their investors, which are hoping for more uplifting news in the markets.

But most venture capitalists will remain under considerable strain. Even when they invested during the last down cycle of 2002 and 2003 — when valuations were lower, letting them get a larger ownership stake in companies they backed — VCs didn’t do well. The median internal rate of return (IRR) for a 2002 vintage VC fund (a fund that began investing in 2002, when the stock market was rock bottom) is -1.2%, according to PE Wire, citing Thomson Reuters data. That means they’ve lost the equivalent of 1.2 percent every year over the past six years, even though VCs have had about that long to grow the companies. With the market turning downward now, it’s unlikely that number will increase significantly, as firms may have a tough time selling companies and locking into profits.

The median IRR for a 2003 vintage VC fund is 0.9 percent.

These performances are worse than many expected. The question is whether VCs will do as poorly with their 2009 funds. Uncertainty about this will only cloud the outlook for startups going forward.

Many startups have been panicked by the presentation given by Sequoia Capital two weeks ago detailing the negative outlook, and a bevy of them have moved quickly to slash their workforces by about 30 percent. These include Sequoia-backed Adbrite and Jive Software.

Should other startups do the same? We’ll be holding a set of rountables next week to ask and answer these questions in more detail. If you’re interested in participating in the Oct. 29 event, go here and follow directions. The event will feature some of the most experienced thinkers in this area. Speakers include Kleiner Perkins’ John Doerr, and angels Ron Conway and Ram Shriram. We have limited space, so move quickly.

Next Story: S*BIO takes $26M for cancer therapeutics
Previous Story: Watercooler brings more TV shows to social networks

Bookmark and Share

Tags:

Photo of Matt Marshall

About the Author, Matt Marshall

Matt Marshall is editor and CEO of VentureBeat. Follow him on Twitter at @mmarshall, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • The spot is on the VC world, and it is not the rosy pictures that the newspapers bragging about Yahoo, Google or Skype were giving us so far.

    In addition to the numbers given here, another very interesting study from Oliver Gottschalg on the returns from Private Equity (http://www.soxfirst.com/50226711/private.pdf), looking at 1300 firms over the duration of their funds actually indicates that the average return from these firms is S&P minus 3%. The actual results are S&P plus 3% before fees, but these people are expensive and in the end the LPs are not making that good of a deal.

    Sadly nobody really cares about what the VCs do, because they are managing money which is considered "alternative investments" by the bigger guys (the LPOs) so as long as they do not loose money but make somewhat reasonable returns, and as long as they do not do anything crazy, chances are that the LPs will be happy. Even if their "alternative investment" does not do as well as they could hope, and as long as the newspapers keep bragging that this is an area worth investing in, then the status quo stands.

    But we are now in times of trouble and every single bit counts. So it is time to review what is going on, and try to figure out what the rumor about the VC model being broken is about.

    And the issue is that it is based on false assumptions, because the same study mentioned above will also tell you that there is no such thing as track record. A team of experienced VCs will do just as good or just as bad as a team with no track record, the science shows no correlation between the experience of the team and the success of a fund. Oops!
    So paying a lot of money for money managers who may or may not perform (costing 6% to the LPs once all costs are factored in) is spending too much money for the value.

    The best thing that startups can do for themselves is to stay away from VCs and focus on generating revenues. VCs will not help startups, they never really do, they will help their investors make the best out of the situation. Which means that if you are small and worried about what is going to happen they will use the downturn as a way to get a better valuation for themselves. And with their selection criteria (outside of their own friends you need to have customers, revenues, a solid team, a proven product) if you are alive today you will probably make it without them.
  • I saw already another sources this In addition to the numbers given here, another very interesting study from Oliver Gottschalg on the returns from Private Equity (http://www.soxfirst.com/50226711/private.pdf), thanks.
    islami sohbet
  • andrea
    Watch this insightful video about our economy. http://www.thetruthabout.com/public/297.cfm?aff...
  • izmirhalykama
    thanks
  • izmirhalykama