Comments on: SolFocus scores a big deal for concentrating solar power http://venturebeat.com/2008/11/03/solfocus-scores-a-big-deal-for-concentrating-solar-power/ News About Tech, Money and Innovation Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:07:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: abercrombie622 http://venturebeat.com/2008/11/03/solfocus-scores-a-big-deal-for-concentrating-solar-power/comment-page-1/#comment-895979 abercrombie622 Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:10:41 +0000 http://venturebeat.com/?p=99903#comment-895979 Why tiffany jewellery is your best choice?Compared with other jewellerys,tiffany jewellery have many advantages.<br><a href="http://www.tiffanyjewelleryonsale.co.uk" rel="nofollow">www.tiffanyjewelleryonsale.co.uk</a> Why tiffany jewellery is your best choice?Compared with other jewellerys,tiffany jewellery have many advantages.
http://www.tiffanyjewelleryonsale.co.uk

]]> By: ss http://venturebeat.com/2008/11/03/solfocus-scores-a-big-deal-for-concentrating-solar-power/comment-page-1/#comment-874078 ss Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:56:16 +0000 http://venturebeat.com/?p=99903#comment-874078 aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaa

]]> By: ss http://venturebeat.com/2008/11/03/solfocus-scores-a-big-deal-for-concentrating-solar-power/comment-page-1/#comment-874075 ss Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:55:18 +0000 http://venturebeat.com/?p=99903#comment-874075 ha ha ha ha ha ha

]]> By: Eric K http://venturebeat.com/2008/11/03/solfocus-scores-a-big-deal-for-concentrating-solar-power/comment-page-1/#comment-874077 Eric K Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:59:51 +0000 http://venturebeat.com/?p=99903#comment-874077 So lets see, Obamas plan calls for 150B over 10y= 15B/year. How about next year we spend 15B on parabolic trough solar thermal fields in the desert ( the mohave, sahara, whatever its called, we aren't using it for shit). This is a technology that is tried and trued and we know it works well. Its on parity with coal (so they say); look at the inputs...glass, steel, and water. I'm all for advancing technology as the next guy, but when we have something that works now, why not use it???? So lets see, Obamas plan calls for 150B over 10y= 15B/year. How about next year we spend 15B on parabolic trough solar thermal fields in the desert ( the mohave, sahara, whatever its called, we aren't using it for shit). This is a technology that is tried and trued and we know it works well. Its on parity with coal (so they say); look at the inputs…glass, steel, and water. I'm all for advancing technology as the next guy, but when we have something that works now, why not use it????

]]> By: frank nanreaux http://venturebeat.com/2008/11/03/solfocus-scores-a-big-deal-for-concentrating-solar-power/comment-page-1/#comment-874076 frank nanreaux Tue, 04 Nov 2008 04:05:21 +0000 http://venturebeat.com/?p=99903#comment-874076 Dear writer: I note that you quickly rewrote your earlier post wherein you kept referring to CPV as "CVP". By the way, are you aware that 10MW is a small deal, and not the "world's largest" as SolFocus is claiming ? You dont think so, Google CPV contracts...<br><br>Do they have any projects in the US ? Except for the KGO "plant" off Dumbarton bridge ? And how much did they contribute to Pelosi's campaign to have her show up. And since when is having an opportunistic politician "light up" a solar plant any measure of achievement ? Dear writer: I note that you quickly rewrote your earlier post wherein you kept referring to CPV as “CVP”. By the way, are you aware that 10MW is a small deal, and not the “world's largest” as SolFocus is claiming ? You dont think so, Google CPV contracts…

Do they have any projects in the US ? Except for the KGO “plant” off Dumbarton bridge ? And how much did they contribute to Pelosi's campaign to have her show up. And since when is having an opportunistic politician “light up” a solar plant any measure of achievement ?

]]> By: chandanmal http://venturebeat.com/2008/11/03/solfocus-scores-a-big-deal-for-concentrating-solar-power/comment-page-1/#comment-874074 chandanmal Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:20:38 +0000 http://venturebeat.com/?p=99903#comment-874074 Instead of writing assay type, you simply give the figures . You have not mentioned energy cost per peak watt. Is it cheaper than silicon cell? Instead of writing assay type, you simply give the figures . You have not mentioned energy cost per peak watt. Is it cheaper than silicon cell?

]]>