<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VentureSource: Worst venture liquidity in five years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/02/venturesource-lowest-venture-liquidity-in-five-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/02/venturesource-lowest-venture-liquidity-in-five-years/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:07:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Dahan</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/02/venturesource-lowest-venture-liquidity-in-five-years/comment-page-1/#comment-874671</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Dahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 06:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=102201#comment-874671</guid>
		<description>Peter - &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is not a canned comment. I wrote this in response to Anthony&#039;s post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And &quot;yes&quot;, I believe in the need and opportunity of The START Fund. I am hoping to implement this Seed fund decdicated to working with, supporting and compensating the Seed Community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter &#8211; </p>
<p>This is not a canned comment. I wrote this in response to Anthony&#39;s post.</p>
<p>And &#8220;yes&#8221;, I believe in the need and opportunity of The START Fund. I am hoping to implement this Seed fund decdicated to working with, supporting and compensating the Seed Community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/02/venturesource-lowest-venture-liquidity-in-five-years/comment-page-1/#comment-874670</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=102201#comment-874670</guid>
		<description>Elliot, is this a canned comment you&#039;re using to promote  this &quot;START&quot; fund?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elliot, is this a canned comment you&#39;re using to promote  this &#8220;START&#8221; fund?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeDuck</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/02/venturesource-lowest-venture-liquidity-in-five-years/comment-page-1/#comment-874676</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeDuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 12:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=102201#comment-874676</guid>
		<description>Anthony it would be nice to see more measures of the total  investment in all startups or a cross sections of startups over various periods of time.   I&#039;m concerned that the stories always feature the big winners and thus I think inflate the actual VC returns which I think are very negative these days as companies go belly up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony it would be nice to see more measures of the total  investment in all startups or a cross sections of startups over various periods of time.   I&#39;m concerned that the stories always feature the big winners and thus I think inflate the actual VC returns which I think are very negative these days as companies go belly up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave McClure</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/02/venturesource-lowest-venture-liquidity-in-five-years/comment-page-1/#comment-874675</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave McClure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 12:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=102201#comment-874675</guid>
		<description>anthony: while the top-end is interesting, the median case (for exit via smaller M&amp;A) is possibly more educational.  might be useful to look at distribution curve / graph of exits on quarterly basis, and then compare median exits over time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;guessing overall trend is towards smaller median exit, which might be ok for angels &amp; smaller VCs, not so great for traditional VC.  also interesting if median skewed down a lot or a little in Q3-Q4/08, and going forward in 2009.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;to summarize: median case may tell us more than outliers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anthony: while the top-end is interesting, the median case (for exit via smaller M&#038;A) is possibly more educational.  might be useful to look at distribution curve / graph of exits on quarterly basis, and then compare median exits over time.</p>
<p>guessing overall trend is towards smaller median exit, which might be ok for angels &#038; smaller VCs, not so great for traditional VC.  also interesting if median skewed down a lot or a little in Q3-Q4/08, and going forward in 2009.</p>
<p>to summarize: median case may tell us more than outliers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Dahan</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/02/venturesource-lowest-venture-liquidity-in-five-years/comment-page-1/#comment-874674</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Dahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 07:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=102201#comment-874674</guid>
		<description>Anthony - &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perfectly understandable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have a good New Year and keep up your good writing - I really enjoy your work&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Elliott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony &#8211; </p>
<p>Perfectly understandable.</p>
<p>Have a good New Year and keep up your good writing &#8211; I really enjoy your work</p>
<p>Elliott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Ha</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/02/venturesource-lowest-venture-liquidity-in-five-years/comment-page-1/#comment-874673</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 07:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=102201#comment-874673</guid>
		<description>OK, fair enough. It would have been nice if you had made the connection more explicit in your initial comment, but I probably overreacted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, fair enough. It would have been nice if you had made the connection more explicit in your initial comment, but I probably overreacted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Dahan</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/02/venturesource-lowest-venture-liquidity-in-five-years/comment-page-1/#comment-874672</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Dahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 04:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=102201#comment-874672</guid>
		<description>Anthony - &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe my post is very relevant to your post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By strengthening the Seed level, you strengthen the potential for successful exits.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, you cannot expect the Traditional VC stage to work with, support or compensate the existing Seed Infrastructure (incubators, tech transfers, economic development agencies, etc.) You cannot expect the Angel level of investing to efficiently source, screen and provide oversight to a Seed Community with no geographic constraints.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, strengthen the Seed Level&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, &quot;clean out&quot; the traditional VC level&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony &#8211; </p>
<p>I believe my post is very relevant to your post.</p>
<p>By strengthening the Seed level, you strengthen the potential for successful exits.</p>
<p>But, you cannot expect the Traditional VC stage to work with, support or compensate the existing Seed Infrastructure (incubators, tech transfers, economic development agencies, etc.) You cannot expect the Angel level of investing to efficiently source, screen and provide oversight to a Seed Community with no geographic constraints.</p>
<p>First, strengthen the Seed Level</p>
<p>Second, &#8220;clean out&#8221; the traditional VC level</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Ha</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/02/venturesource-lowest-venture-liquidity-in-five-years/comment-page-1/#comment-874669</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 03:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=102201#comment-874669</guid>
		<description>This barely seems relevant to my post at all. Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This barely seems relevant to my post at all. Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Ha</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/02/venturesource-lowest-venture-liquidity-in-five-years/comment-page-1/#comment-874667</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 02:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=102201#comment-874667</guid>
		<description>I agree that this just confirms an existing trend -- one that VentureBeat has covered extensively -- but the data itself is new, and was just released today. You can&#039;t make an apples-to-apples comparison between 2007 and 2008 until 2008 is over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this just confirms an existing trend &#8212; one that VentureBeat has covered extensively &#8212; but the data itself is new, and was just released today. You can&#39;t make an apples-to-apples comparison between 2007 and 2008 until 2008 is over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Dahan</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/02/venturesource-lowest-venture-liquidity-in-five-years/comment-page-1/#comment-874668</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Dahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 02:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=102201#comment-874668</guid>
		<description>The Venture Risk Investing industry is divided into 3 distinct groups: (1) Seed/Startup; (2) Traditional VC and (3) Exit&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They are systemically, operationally and attitudinally different. They have different metrics for acceptance and success; funding, oversight, sourcing, profitability and, most importantly, infrastructure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is needed is a dedicated effort to work with, support and compensate the Seed Infrastructure (Incubators, Economic Development Agencies, Tech Transfers). This infrastructure already exists and provides the efficient sourcing, screening and post-investment oversight needed to develop Series A worthy companies. What is needed is a dedicated effort that is not geographically constrained. What is needed is a thorough Virtual Incubation system that brings both Community and Collaboration to all elements of the total Investing community.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By dedicating a private/public collaboration to increasing the value and viability of early stage companies you are also increasing their valuation for their Series A round; thereby leveling the playing field with what will be a smaller group of Traditional VC funds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This Seed dedicated effort can take two forms:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(1)	Standalone Fund&lt;br&gt;(2)	Operating Division of a Traditional VC Firm&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please review the powerpoint – The START Fund - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slideshare.net/ElliottDahan/start-fund-jan2009-presentation/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.slideshare.net/ElliottDahan/start-fu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I look forward to all comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Elliott Dahan&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:Elliott@thegrowthgroup.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Elliott@thegrowthgroup.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Venture Risk Investing industry is divided into 3 distinct groups: (1) Seed/Startup; (2) Traditional VC and (3) Exit</p>
<p>They are systemically, operationally and attitudinally different. They have different metrics for acceptance and success; funding, oversight, sourcing, profitability and, most importantly, infrastructure.</p>
<p>What is needed is a dedicated effort to work with, support and compensate the Seed Infrastructure (Incubators, Economic Development Agencies, Tech Transfers). This infrastructure already exists and provides the efficient sourcing, screening and post-investment oversight needed to develop Series A worthy companies. What is needed is a dedicated effort that is not geographically constrained. What is needed is a thorough Virtual Incubation system that brings both Community and Collaboration to all elements of the total Investing community.</p>
<p>By dedicating a private/public collaboration to increasing the value and viability of early stage companies you are also increasing their valuation for their Series A round; thereby leveling the playing field with what will be a smaller group of Traditional VC funds.</p>
<p>This Seed dedicated effort can take two forms:</p>
<p>(1)	Standalone Fund<br />(2)	Operating Division of a Traditional VC Firm</p>
<p>Please review the powerpoint – The START Fund &#8211; <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/ElliottDahan/start-fund-jan2009-presentation/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/ElliottDahan/start-fu.." rel="nofollow">http://www.slideshare.net/ElliottDahan/start-fu..</a>.</p>
<p>I look forward to all comments.</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>Elliott Dahan<br /><a href="mailto:Elliott@thegrowthgroup.com" rel="nofollow">Elliott@thegrowthgroup.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Aberman</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/02/venturesource-lowest-venture-liquidity-in-five-years/comment-page-1/#comment-874666</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Aberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 01:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=102201#comment-874666</guid>
		<description>This is not really new information, but is a good reminder of what we in the Venture Community already know.  What this article does remind us though is that often when something makes its way into print or the blogosphere it is referenced past events and making them current again -- something that reaffirms a negative cycle.  Those of us that have money to deploy are looking forward and asking ourselves a few key questions: (i) what types of companies are going to be attractive to investors in three to five years, (ii) are our businesses properly configured to take advantage of those opportunities and (iii) how can we help entrepreneurs take the risk and succeed during a time where the negative energy is pervasive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not really new information, but is a good reminder of what we in the Venture Community already know.  What this article does remind us though is that often when something makes its way into print or the blogosphere it is referenced past events and making them current again &#8212; something that reaffirms a negative cycle.  Those of us that have money to deploy are looking forward and asking ourselves a few key questions: (i) what types of companies are going to be attractive to investors in three to five years, (ii) are our businesses properly configured to take advantage of those opportunities and (iii) how can we help entrepreneurs take the risk and succeed during a time where the negative energy is pervasive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
