<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla to fund open-source web video tech development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/26/mozilla-to-fund-open-source-web-video-technology-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/26/mozilla-to-fund-open-source-web-video-technology-development/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:19:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bill_mcgonigle</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/26/mozilla-to-fund-open-source-web-video-technology-development/comment-page-1/#comment-859373</link>
		<dc:creator>bill_mcgonigle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=103179#comment-859373</guid>
		<description>Google&#039;s support of Mozilla is none too altruistic - they want that traffic and are willing to pay for it so they can sell their ads.  Some see Chrome as an attempt to pull back some of that revenue.  Given the IT challenges of replicating YouTube, I suspect Google would be better off with an open streaming solution, since they&#039;re not likely to lose too much traffic over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#39;s support of Mozilla is none too altruistic &#8211; they want that traffic and are willing to pay for it so they can sell their ads.  Some see Chrome as an attempt to pull back some of that revenue.  Given the IT challenges of replicating YouTube, I suspect Google would be better off with an open streaming solution, since they&#39;re not likely to lose too much traffic over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
