<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter gets half the press coverage of Facebook, but a fraction of its traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:07:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: xxooxx</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-903425</link>
		<dc:creator>xxooxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=104168#comment-903425</guid>
		<description>Laptop Battery &lt;a title=&quot;Laptop Battery&quot; href=&quot;http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com&quot; rel=&quot;dofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Laptop Battery&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Laptop Batteries&lt;br&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Laptop Batteries&quot; href=&quot;http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com&quot; rel=&quot;dofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Laptop Batteries&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; discount laptop battery&lt;br&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;discount laptop battery&quot; href=&quot;http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com&quot; rel=&quot;dofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;discount laptop battery&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;notebook battery&quot; href=&quot;http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com&quot; rel=&quot;dofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;notebook battery&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  notebook battery&lt;br&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;computer battery&quot; href=&quot;http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com&quot; rel=&quot;dofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;computer battery&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  computer battery&lt;br&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;replacement laptop battery&quot; href=&quot;http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com&quot; rel=&quot;dofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;replacement laptop battery&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  replacement laptop battery&lt;br&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;notebook batteries&quot; href=&quot;http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com&quot; rel=&quot;dofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;notebook batteries&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; notebook batteries</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laptop Battery <a title="Laptop Battery" href="http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com" rel="dofollow" rel="nofollow"><strong>Laptop Battery</strong></a> Laptop Batteries<br /><a title="Laptop Batteries" href="http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com" rel="dofollow" rel="nofollow"><strong>Laptop Batteries</strong></a> discount laptop battery<br /><a title="discount laptop battery" href="http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com" rel="dofollow" rel="nofollow"><strong>discount laptop battery</strong></a> <br /><a title="notebook battery" href="http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com" rel="dofollow" rel="nofollow"><strong>notebook battery</strong></a>  notebook battery<br /><a title="computer battery" href="http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com" rel="dofollow" rel="nofollow"><strong>computer battery</strong></a>  computer battery<br /><a title="replacement laptop battery" href="http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com" rel="dofollow" rel="nofollow"><strong>replacement laptop battery</strong></a>  replacement laptop battery<br /><a title="notebook batteries" href="http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com" rel="dofollow" rel="nofollow"><strong>notebook batteries</strong></a> notebook batteries</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-861815</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=104168#comment-861815</guid>
		<description>While there&#039;s no released data I&#039;m aware of, the much more important metric is &#039;active users&#039;.  Of those monthly uniques to Facebook, I&#039;d bet literally tens of millions of those people are active users, i.e. they check in several times a week, if not more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The common sense test immediately tells you Facebook active users vs. Twitter.  I&#039;d bet nearly anyone in their teens or 20&#039;s, many people in their 30&#039;s, and even a good number of 40+ know Facebook, and are likely to be using it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter on the other hand...I&#039;m surprised how many seemingly tech-savvy young people are completely clueless and sometimes don&#039;t even recognize the name.  And I live and work in San Francisco, with my last two trips being Tokyo and NYC.  These aren&#039;t backwater folks I&#039;m talking about.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And the press&#039; love affair with Twitter is clear and open...a little tail wagging the dog perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While there&#39;s no released data I&#39;m aware of, the much more important metric is &#39;active users&#39;.  Of those monthly uniques to Facebook, I&#39;d bet literally tens of millions of those people are active users, i.e. they check in several times a week, if not more.</p>
<p>The common sense test immediately tells you Facebook active users vs. Twitter.  I&#39;d bet nearly anyone in their teens or 20&#39;s, many people in their 30&#39;s, and even a good number of 40+ know Facebook, and are likely to be using it.</p>
<p>Twitter on the other hand&#8230;I&#39;m surprised how many seemingly tech-savvy young people are completely clueless and sometimes don&#39;t even recognize the name.  And I live and work in San Francisco, with my last two trips being Tokyo and NYC.  These aren&#39;t backwater folks I&#39;m talking about.</p>
<p>And the press&#39; love affair with Twitter is clear and open&#8230;a little tail wagging the dog perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Eldon</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-861827</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Eldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 23:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=104168#comment-861827</guid>
		<description>Although search and web traffic are two different metrics, they do have SOMETHING to do with each other.  Which is why I noted the Compete numbers, above. In terms of traffic, Yahoo and Google are about neck and neck (similar to their search results), according to comScore:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=2730&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t have all the data at my disposal, of course, but at least I have data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although search and web traffic are two different metrics, they do have SOMETHING to do with each other.  Which is why I noted the Compete numbers, above. In terms of traffic, Yahoo and Google are about neck and neck (similar to their search results), according to comScore:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=2730" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press.." rel="nofollow">http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press..</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t have all the data at my disposal, of course, but at least I have data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikkel deMib Svendsen</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-861826</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikkel deMib Svendsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=104168#comment-861826</guid>
		<description>Searches for a website name and traffic to that websites services has NOTHING to do with each other.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As an example take a look at Yahoo vs Google on Google trends&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://google.com/trends?q=google%252Cyahoo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://google.com/trends?q=google%2Cyahoo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, is Yahoo bigger than Google too?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, even though both Facebook and Twitter have external tools I am pretty sure a lot more of Twitter users are using them than facebook users.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not saying Twitter is bigger than Facebook - they are not. I just hate it when invalid data is used to argue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Searches for a website name and traffic to that websites services has NOTHING to do with each other.</p>
<p>As an example take a look at Yahoo vs Google on Google trends<br /><a href="http://google.com/trends?q=google%252Cyahoo" rel="nofollow">http://google.com/trends?q=google%2Cyahoo</a></p>
<p>So, is Yahoo bigger than Google too?</p>
<p>Also, even though both Facebook and Twitter have external tools I am pretty sure a lot more of Twitter users are using them than facebook users.</p>
<p>I am not saying Twitter is bigger than Facebook &#8211; they are not. I just hate it when invalid data is used to argue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris R</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-861825</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=104168#comment-861825</guid>
		<description>Good insight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good insight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-861824</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=104168#comment-861824</guid>
		<description>If you are a twitter user, just ask yourself:  do you actually go to &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;twitter.com&lt;/a&gt; to do anything?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most likely, you use one of Twitter-api powered tools to interact with Twitter instead of actually going to &lt;a href=&quot;http://Twitter.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter.com&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are a twitter user, just ask yourself:  do you actually go to <a href="http://twitter.com" rel="nofollow">twitter.com</a> to do anything?</p>
<p>Most likely, you use one of Twitter-api powered tools to interact with Twitter instead of actually going to <a href="http://Twitter.com" rel="nofollow">Twitter.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MG Siegler</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-861823</link>
		<dc:creator>MG Siegler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=104168#comment-861823</guid>
		<description>It used to be because Twitter was too unreliable to write about all the time (unless you were writing about that of course), but these days I think it has to do with FriendFeed slowing the pace at which it releases small, new features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It used to be because Twitter was too unreliable to write about all the time (unless you were writing about that of course), but these days I think it has to do with FriendFeed slowing the pace at which it releases small, new features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PKafka</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-861822</link>
		<dc:creator>PKafka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=104168#comment-861822</guid>
		<description>Yeah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Eldon</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-861821</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Eldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=104168#comment-861821</guid>
		<description>I was going to say Kindle, but yeah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to say Kindle, but yeah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PKafka</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-861820</link>
		<dc:creator>PKafka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=104168#comment-861820</guid>
		<description>Next up: why do people write about apple so much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next up: why do people write about apple so much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MG Siegler</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-861819</link>
		<dc:creator>MG Siegler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=104168#comment-861819</guid>
		<description>Why are you cheating on #tooinsidery with #toometa? #tooinsidery</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you cheating on #tooinsidery with #toometa? #tooinsidery</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Eldon</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-861818</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Eldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=104168#comment-861818</guid>
		<description>#toometa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#toometa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MG Siegler</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-861817</link>
		<dc:creator>MG Siegler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=104168#comment-861817</guid>
		<description>And it&#039;s even easier to cover coverage of said items.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it&#39;s even easier to cover coverage of said items.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PKafka</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-861816</link>
		<dc:creator>PKafka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=104168#comment-861816</guid>
		<description>Easiest answer: Because while it&#039;s incredibly easy to cover Facebook (see &quot;OMG people are using this 25 things thing on Facebook!), it&#039;s even easier to cover Twitter (&quot;Twitter! 140 characters! No revenue! etc).&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s a separate answer that has to do with online publications and page views and feedback loops, but we&#039;ll save that for another day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easiest answer: Because while it&#39;s incredibly easy to cover Facebook (see &#8220;OMG people are using this 25 things thing on Facebook!), it&#39;s even easier to cover Twitter (&#8221;Twitter! 140 characters! No revenue! etc).<br />There&#39;s a separate answer that has to do with online publications and page views and feedback loops, but we&#39;ll save that for another day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Eldon</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/19/twitter-gets-half-the-press-coverage-of-facebook-but-a-fraction-of-its-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-861814</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Eldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=104168#comment-861814</guid>
		<description>Jack, I&#039;d briefly touched on the API usage variable -- certainly makes the picture less clear. But Facebook has Connect now, which also muddies these waters. And then there&#039;s the search volume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, I&#39;d briefly touched on the API usage variable &#8212; certainly makes the picture less clear. But Facebook has Connect now, which also muddies these waters. And then there&#39;s the search volume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
