The VC walking dead: Extended edition

A couple weeks ago, Dan Primack of PE Hub blogged a list of venture capital firms he termed the “VC Walking Dead” — firms that by all indication appear to still be in business but lack the cash to bring new investments on board. This got us thinking. While Dan’s list included 14 firms, there had to be a lot more out there. Maybe they wouldn’t be big ones, or marquee names, but surely more firms petered out, either during the dot-com crash or soon after.

Here’s what we did: We got two big lists from the National Venture Capital Association, one with firms that had successfully raised money in 2000 and 2001, and one with firms that had survived to raise funds between 2002 and the present. We compared them side by side, determining which firms had failed to rope further funding in the last eight years. Some of these firms may not exist anymore — they’re just dead. But a surprising number, many more than PE Hub indicated, have kept the lights on somehow.

Take a look at the Docstoc file below, and you’ll see our full list of the walking dead, highlighted in yello — there’s a huge number of them. Those unhighlighted were able to raise funds in subsequent years.

To highlight a few, one that we found that didn’t make Dan’s list is Walden International. Chairman Lip-Bu Tan told us a while back that he planned to scale back his own involvement in the firm to focus on his role as chief executive of semiconductor company Cadence, but other than that the firm hasn’t commented on its reduced activity. Crescendo Ventures is another firm that may not make it. Managing general partner David Spreng says he still hasn’t given up on raising a fresh fund, but he’s been actively trying for three years now. Hope is slipping out of his hands….so for now, he’s among the walking dead.

There is one other caveat with this list. Due to some incomplete data for 2009, we might have come up with a few false positives. Please let us know if you find one and we’ll make a correction. For example, our methodology had indicated that Bain Capital (which was listed misleadingly as a separate entity from Bain Capital Ventures) was a zombie firm, but we knew it just landed $475 million for its new fund in mid-February, and corrected the record.

[Update: Warburg Pincus LLC has been taken off the list of the walking dead. The data did not reflect the $15 billion fund it closed last April. Walden International has now also been taken off the list. According to chairman Lip-Bu Tan, the firm raised a $285 million fund in August 2006 with a four-year investment period. VentureSource did not capture this news because Walden is a cross border fund, Tan says. Adams Capital Management has also been removed from the list, having raised $115 million last year, according to general partner Bill Frezza. Draper Richards has been removed from the list for slightly different reasons. The firm has never taken outside money because its general partners are its limited partners, financing it from the inside. It is still alive, though it did not appear to be according to our data. Grandbanks Capital has been removed from the list. It had a first close on its new fund of $85 million last month. KT Venture Group has been removed from the list, not because it doesn't fit our criteria -- it last raised a fund in 2000 -- but because it is the venture arm of KLA-Tencor and is therefore an evergreen fund. Nexit Ventures has also been removed, having raised a $110 million fund last year that did not appear in our data. CommonAngels has also been stricken from the list because -- as James Geshwiler comments -- it raised a fund that was not evident in our data in 2005. Azure Capital Partners has been removed from the list, having raised its second fund in 2006. Catalyst Investors has also been removed from the list because it raised a fund in 2006, so it appears that we had some incomplete data for that year.]


Walking Dead - Free Legal Forms

Next Story: Prism Solar looks to raise ambitious $150M for solar hologram plant
Previous Story: The DiggBar features sponsored links as well

Bookmark and Share

Tags: ,

Photo of Camille Ricketts

About the Author, Camille Ricketts

Camille is the lead writer for GreenBeat. She came to VentureBeat from Google where she worked on its traditional platforms team, particularly in TV. Before that, she was a reporter for the Wall Street Journal in New York and London. Follow her on Twitter at @camillericketts, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

With GreenBeat 2009, VentureBeat's all-star conference on all things Smart Grid, coming up in November, Camille will be expanding coverage of this exciting space. Stay up to date by following @greenbeat2009 on Twitter or by becoming a fan of the event on Facebook here.

  • Dan Primack
    Three quick notes:

    1. Crescendo Ventures did make our list, although it has a recycling provision that (at least in theory) lets it do new deals.

    2. Yeah, there are a lot more than the ones I identified. However, I only identified firms that acknowledged (or had someone close to them acknowledge) that they were out of dry powder. My "I think they're walking dead" list is much longer.

    3. Might want to doublecheck a bunch of the "yellow" ones. For example, Warburg Pincus raised $10 billion just last year.
  • AForce10
    You missed Worldview. They merit an entire article on their own for their promises, hubris, performance (i.e., lack of). Suggest you interview their remaining partners (less and less by the quarter) and write something up.

    Other noteworthy misses: Vantage, Vanguard.
  • Dave
    Ugh, this can get you in a lot of trouble, which is why the trade publications have stayed away from reporting an all-encompassing list like this ... you have to be absolutely sure, and you have to check with the firms as some investments may not have been disclosed, while other firms plan to or are raising new funds. There are definitely several on this list that are still active, like, as Dan notes, Warburg Pincus. Gabriel Venture Partners is another active firm. Expect some phone calls from VCs.
  • To respond to some of the comments, we're aware that there might be some errors in this list due to incomplete data for firms that recently raised funds. That being said, we're very interested in correcting the record.

    The list has been corrected to reflect that Warburg Pincus is still alive and well. As for Gabriel Venture Partners, can you please send me a link referencing a more recently-raised fund? I was unable to find one.

    The list does in fact include Vanguard. Worldview and Vantage didn't make the cut due to the particular parameters we used. While they might appear dormant today, they have both raised funds since 2001, which is what we focused on. But thanks for pointing out their limited activity!
  • Hi Camille,

    Why didn't you also include years '96-99? Wouldn't that significantly grow this list.

    Could you provide this in downloadable format? I can copy text but lose your formatting.

    What do you peg active number of VC firms at today?

    Thanks!
    Rob
  • Hi Rob,
    Thanks for the comment. The data we received from the NVCA didn't date back that far, unfortunately, and we figured the biggest shift probably occurred in the early 2000s. As for downloading the current file, you can click on the link that says "Walking Dead" in small font under the DocStoc embed to download. Putting a fine point on the number of active VC firms might be a little difficult considering how much flux there is -- and I don't think I have a comprehensive list yet, but I will poke around and try to find the answer for you.

    Best,
    Camille
  • This is great research, thank you. I am sure there are more false positives in here, but making if public and getting the crowd to give more data is superb. This web 2.0 stuff works, huh! Eyeballing the yellow list, 2 that really surprised me a) Apax b) TA Associates. I have no knowledge of either, just surprised based on reputation.
  • scott
    You're missing a lot.

    Cross reference it with TheFunded's
  • this is valuable information, but i hope your vetting process is a bit more thorough than just publishing a list and waiting for corrections to be crowdsourced... if you haven't already, i'd suggest checking in with VentureSource and VentureEconomics and see if you can cross-reference active firms that are still reporting deal data with any other sources you have (like NVCA / MoneyTree / TheFunded, etc). you might then pick a window of activity (perhaps 6-9 months? 1 year?) to see if any active deals have been reported, and list firms that have not reported an investment in the past 3-4 quarters on the suspect list. then double-check fundraising activity with those firms, to see when they raised their last fund, and whether they're involved in raising a new one.

    anyway, not sure what your background process is on this, but to the extent you're punching a few VCs in the face here by listing them, i'd make sure they really are inactive... or you might also get punched back too ;)

    again the info is valuable, but accuracy (or at least a solid effort) counts for a lot.
  • Shanker Trivedi
    Thanks for an excellent analysis. However, I am a pretty sure that Gabriel and Telesoft are actively investing! Please can you cross-check these two companies status. Thanks
  • Not a bad first cut. For the record, CommonAngels is quite alive and well. We raised a new fund in 2005 but also aren't dependent on funds because we're also a large angel group that provides capital. We just announced a new investment, have a couple more in the works, and should have put VentureBeat on distribution list for the press release. http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/03/30/instre...
  • OE
    Outlook Ventures should be listed in the deadpool. They haven't raised a new fund for years.
  • dub
    Spectrum? TA? How about no...
  • Diamondhead should not be listed here... they merged with Onset, and are doing fine.
  • Would be great to see a European list in the equivelent vain... it will be a lot shorter and more yellow ;-)
  • SAC
    The author is smokin' hot. BTW, Audax Group is highlighted but they're currently hiring, why would they be hiring if they were going to shut down.