<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office 2010 continues Microsoft&#8217;s streak of brilliant product names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/15/office-2010-continues-microsofts-streak-of-brilliant-product-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/15/office-2010-continues-microsofts-streak-of-brilliant-product-names/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Office 2010 Cometh</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/15/office-2010-continues-microsofts-streak-of-brilliant-product-names/comment-page-1/#comment-859388</link>
		<dc:creator>Office 2010 Cometh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=106316#comment-859388</guid>
		<description>I would be interested in seeing Office 2010&#039;s compatibility with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hyperoffice.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;online collaboration software like HyperOffice &lt;/a&gt;, which have traditionally worked well with the desktop Office suite.  There is a natural fit, since people would now be able to collaborate on Office documents without having to depend on the local system having MS Office installed, and also have other productivity software wrapped around (calendars, workspaces, tasks). But i wonder if Microsoft wants this pie for itself, and will develop its own collaboration system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be interested in seeing Office 2010&#39;s compatibility with <a href="http://www.hyperoffice.com" rel="nofollow">online collaboration software like HyperOffice </a>, which have traditionally worked well with the desktop Office suite.  There is a natural fit, since people would now be able to collaborate on Office documents without having to depend on the local system having MS Office installed, and also have other productivity software wrapped around (calendars, workspaces, tasks). But i wonder if Microsoft wants this pie for itself, and will develop its own collaboration system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Ha</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/15/office-2010-continues-microsofts-streak-of-brilliant-product-names/comment-page-1/#comment-859385</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=106316#comment-859385</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t say I&#039;m such a regular user of each version of Office that I can comment myself (plus I do all of my work writing in Google Docs), but that&#039;s definitely something I hear a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#39;t say I&#39;m such a regular user of each version of Office that I can comment myself (plus I do all of my work writing in Google Docs), but that&#39;s definitely something I hear a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Ha</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/15/office-2010-continues-microsofts-streak-of-brilliant-product-names/comment-page-1/#comment-859387</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=106316#comment-859387</guid>
		<description>Can you elaborate? I don&#039;t necessarily agree with Capossellat, but I definitely didn&#039;t see that as a statement that I should be pointing and laughing at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you elaborate? I don&#39;t necessarily agree with Capossellat, but I definitely didn&#39;t see that as a statement that I should be pointing and laughing at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Zewick</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/15/office-2010-continues-microsofts-streak-of-brilliant-product-names/comment-page-1/#comment-859386</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Zewick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=106316#comment-859386</guid>
		<description>“I thought the whole point [of the software-as-a-service model] was that I didn’t have to download anything,” Capossella said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why do you wanna make Capossella look bad? Ah, he deserves it, that&#039;s right.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How can a &#039;Senior Executive&#039; make such a claim? MSFT will have a hard time defending their &#039;software-plus-services&#039; marketing fail.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the mean time I&#039;ll be enjoying my Feng Office (OpenGoo) free-software-plus-better-plus-easier-plus-much-cheaper-service</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I thought the whole point [of the software-as-a-service model] was that I didn’t have to download anything,” Capossella said.</p>
<p>Why do you wanna make Capossella look bad? Ah, he deserves it, that&#39;s right.</p>
<p>How can a &#39;Senior Executive&#39; make such a claim? MSFT will have a hard time defending their &#39;software-plus-services&#39; marketing fail.</p>
<p>In the mean time I&#39;ll be enjoying my Feng Office (OpenGoo) free-software-plus-better-plus-easier-plus-much-cheaper-service</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/15/office-2010-continues-microsofts-streak-of-brilliant-product-names/comment-page-1/#comment-859384</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=106316#comment-859384</guid>
		<description>Office hasn&#039;t really improved much since version 97, and it probably peaked with the 2000/2002 versions in terms of speed and efficiency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Office hasn&#39;t really improved much since version 97, and it probably peaked with the 2000/2002 versions in terms of speed and efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Bevis</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/15/office-2010-continues-microsofts-streak-of-brilliant-product-names/comment-page-1/#comment-859383</link>
		<dc:creator>George Bevis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=106316#comment-859383</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe MS are wasting time hyping mobile phone access.  What a gimmick.  The only message most potential customers care about is &quot;We made a mistake with the ribbon so we&#039;re going to give users their menus back&quot;.  Really, Microsoft, for serious office users that is the only thing that matters.  Office 2003 was great, btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#39;t believe MS are wasting time hyping mobile phone access.  What a gimmick.  The only message most potential customers care about is &#8220;We made a mistake with the ribbon so we&#39;re going to give users their menus back&#8221;.  Really, Microsoft, for serious office users that is the only thing that matters.  Office 2003 was great, btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Gates</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/15/office-2010-continues-microsofts-streak-of-brilliant-product-names/comment-page-1/#comment-859382</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Gates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=106316#comment-859382</guid>
		<description>Microsoft not only will keep streak of brilliant product names but will also keep the momentum of IE8 and Windows 7 extremely good reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft not only will keep streak of brilliant product names but will also keep the momentum of IE8 and Windows 7 extremely good reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/15/office-2010-continues-microsofts-streak-of-brilliant-product-names/comment-page-1/#comment-859381</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=106316#comment-859381</guid>
		<description>Best headline ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best headline ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
