Stock market tanks 2.5 percent. Was recovery a dead-cat bounce?

The stock market fell sharply Monday, as investors sold shares to lock into profits after a significant 24 percent recovery in the Dow Jones since March. The major indexes slid more than 2.5 percent, including the Dow Jones industrial average, which fell 200 points.

Reading the stock market’s direction is a necessity here in Silicon Valley. As much as local entrepreneurs and venture capitalists hate to admit it, their decisions are very much affected by the outlook in the markets. During the first quarter, white-knuckled venture capitalists invested 61 percent less money into startups than they did the same quarter a year ago — with Silicon Valley companies getting hit as hard as any region — in part because investing more money in startups becomes very risky. It may take years for such companies to eventually go public or get sold for a profit. Investors in venture firms are pulling back, too, supporting 40 percent fewer firms during the first quarter than a year ago. Angel investors, meanwhile, have also pulled back. They’d rather invest in public companies that appear down-trodden in value (and thus poised to recover), than in private companies that have to fight through a slow market. Taken all together, there’s a lot of gear crunching: Fewer startups means fewer companies that have traditionally created jobs much faster than large ones.

You just don’t recover as quickly as you think, and so it goes for the rest of the economy.

Today’s stock market news shows investors fear the market has risen too quickly. They may be right. In fact, I was shaking my head this weekend, during a conversation with a banker friend during which he bemoaned that the stock market is already pricing in a solid earnings performance for 2010. The ratio of price to next year’s earnings last week was approaching $13-15, making for a fairly and fully priced stock market — with little room for extra upside, and lots of room for downside. So this morning’s drop makes sense. See chart below. The pricing for next year is still at $11.50 for the S&P and $15 for the Nasdaq.

In other words, the price you’re paying for a given amount of earnings is already high, but you’re not sure if the earnings are really going to turn out in line with what you expect.

We’ve become so accustomed to expecting growth, but I’m not sure we can expect that, given our record over the past decade. Investors are eager for positive news, but to assume companies will perform flawlessly is silly, especially at a time when so many questions remain about the amount of bad debt still in the econom and about the extent to which unemployment will slow recovery. Unemployment just hit 11 percent here in California, and more joblessness means people will be more reluctant to spend and juice economic growth. The last six weeks may in hindsight be a case of those “animal spirits,” where investors breathe a sigh of relief because of statements by banks and others that they are doing okay, and so this wasn’t the end of the world after all. Some investors started buying again.

But you have to ask whether the market’s climb over the past six weeks is just a dead-cat bounce: You throw a cat out of a window high enough, it will bounce off the ground, but will come down again.

Much of the excitement over the past few weeks have come from statements by financial giants, such as Citibank, saying they’re profitable. But there’s a good chance we haven’t seen a bottom yet, despite what everyone’s saying, from Intel to Cypress. Paul Krugman wrote a column over the weekend saying the economy needs a little more good news than what we’ve been getting. He argues things are actually still getting worse, and that some of the good news about the financial sector isn’t really that convincing — with a lot of it coming from the amount of money banks are setting aside to cover expected future losses on their loans. Many analysts are doubting the banks’ assumptions. V-shaped recoveries, where there’s a quick bounce back, only happen when there’s a lot of pent up demand, but we’re not seeing that yet.

Next Story: Popular video site Dailymotion gets new CEO, looks for cash
Previous Story: Oracle to buy Sun Microsystems for $7.4B — finally, this makes sense

Bookmark and Share
Photo of Matt Marshall

About the Author, Matt Marshall

Matt Marshall is editor and CEO of VentureBeat. Follow him on Twitter at @mmarshall, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • Dunlap
    First of all, I'm a little concerned by how nonchalantly you talk about throwing cats out of windows high enough to watch them bounce. That is a little disturbing. Second, I really think that calling anything after ONE bad day is a little quick. You're talking about a 25%+ rise over a month or so, and then you're ready to call it off after a 3% dip? I think I'll wait it out a bit. I've enjoyed the rally so far, and I plan to continue enjoying it, even if there are some dips along the way.
    Also, I have thrown "Futures prices" out the window. How have the future prices been holding up over the past year? Pretty accurate? Why would you expect them to be right now?
  • Matt Marshall
    I like cats, and wouldn't throw them out of the window. I had one, Boots, and I adored him.

    I'm not suggesting this is a one-day call. It's just that there was a gathering euphoria there that seemed a tad risky. I've been following the market too long to suggest I know where it's going from day to day.
  • Eh...most of my friends in the know say the stock market is waste of time in the really long term...in the short term or medium term (10 years or so) you can make money on it, but its just too volatile these days for that to even hold true anymore.
  • Nick
    There is an histeric behaviour regarding stock markets, and the Economy...everybody switch from hyper pessimism to super optimism and back again to hyper pessimism. It is not reasonable that we all live this way. One day this company is great, tomorrow is crap, next week is great again. Banks were a disaster a month ago; then they turned to be the stars of the market, and today they are all going to bankruptcy again??? Come one! I think we should start putting into the ecuation that there are a couple of very few guys driving the markets and the economic forces in one direction or another, and on the other side of counter, there are billions of people following what these guys want us to believe, and making them multi billionaires or even trillionaires in the process. This kind of behaivours make me feel that the entire Economy is just a fantasy, something created by very few to take advantage from all the rest.
  • Every big downturn requires a technology innovation to get out and going again.
    No such thing in sight for the moment.
    Financial powers in the world will change location, just like it happened after the depression of 1872 due to a mortgage lending boom in Europe: the change from Europe to US.
    The real great depression of 1872 (took about 20 years to recover)
    http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2008/10/03/ge...
    http://chronicle.com/weekly/v55/i08/08b09801.htm