<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The background-check scams: Is WhitePages really better than Intelius?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:57:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/comment-page-1/#comment-882568</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107103#comment-882568</guid>
		<description>Who gave Intellius the right to hi-jack Google?  Does Google care? How much do they get kicked-back ?!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who gave Intellius the right to hi-jack Google?  Does Google care? How much do they get kicked-back ?!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/comment-page-1/#comment-882567</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 02:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107103#comment-882567</guid>
		<description>Reservations Rewards is owned by Web Loyalty, a company just like Vertrue/Adaptive, and it is Web Loyalty&#039;s agreement with US Search that is the issue here.  Web Loyalty pays US Search a certain amount of money for each US Search customer that enrolls in the Web Loyalty program.  Problem is, the majority of US Search customers who enroll in Reservation Rewards are doing so without their knowledge.  A lot of money is being made from these post-transaction offers -- and their success is causing them to spread like wildfire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reservations Rewards is owned by Web Loyalty, a company just like Vertrue/Adaptive, and it is Web Loyalty&#39;s agreement with US Search that is the issue here.  Web Loyalty pays US Search a certain amount of money for each US Search customer that enrolls in the Web Loyalty program.  Problem is, the majority of US Search customers who enroll in Reservation Rewards are doing so without their knowledge.  A lot of money is being made from these post-transaction offers &#8212; and their success is causing them to spread like wildfire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dare</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/comment-page-1/#comment-882566</link>
		<dc:creator>Dare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107103#comment-882566</guid>
		<description>If you guys say this is shady practice then you haven&#039;t seen the real shady stuff in the people search business. I have been there analyzing and comparing sites for over 2 years and I&#039;ve seen everything. Scam sites like gov-resources selling &quot;unlimited&quot; access to records (which is not true)...lots of companies who hide and whose address can&#039;t be found even via Whois...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am really happy for whoever does background check and decides to deal with Intelius and USSearch because they seem to be the most legitimate companies around (but as you said, their &quot;legitimness&quot; can be improved.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you guys say this is shady practice then you haven&#39;t seen the real shady stuff in the people search business. I have been there analyzing and comparing sites for over 2 years and I&#39;ve seen everything. Scam sites like gov-resources selling &#8220;unlimited&#8221; access to records (which is not true)&#8230;lots of companies who hide and whose address can&#39;t be found even via Whois&#8230;</p>
<p>I am really happy for whoever does background check and decides to deal with Intelius and USSearch because they seem to be the most legitimate companies around (but as you said, their &#8220;legitimness&#8221; can be improved.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poster</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/comment-page-1/#comment-882565</link>
		<dc:creator>Poster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 03:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107103#comment-882565</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://classactionblog.mdpcelaw.com/2008/08/articles/unauthorized-online-billing/class-action-filed-against-vertrue-inc-adaptive-marketing-llc-vistaprint-usa-inc-and-vistaprint-ltd/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://classactionblog.mdpcelaw.com/2008/08/art...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://classactionblog.mdpcelaw.com/2008/08/articles/unauthorized-online-billing/class-action-filed-against-vertrue-inc-adaptive-marketing-llc-vistaprint-usa-inc-and-vistaprint-ltd/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://classactionblog.mdpcelaw.com/2008/08/art.." rel="nofollow">http://classactionblog.mdpcelaw.com/2008/08/art..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poster</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/comment-page-1/#comment-882564</link>
		<dc:creator>Poster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 23:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107103#comment-882564</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://Vertrue.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Vertrue.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://AdaptiveMarketing.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AdaptiveMarketing.com&lt;/a&gt; (Reservation Rewards) out of Connecticut is behind the scenes on all of the Intellius marketing practices, and probably contributes 25-40% of Intellius&#039; top line revenue for the last couple years.  They are the real ones you should be looking at and writing about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://Vertrue.com" rel="nofollow">Vertrue.com</a> and <a href="http://AdaptiveMarketing.com" rel="nofollow">AdaptiveMarketing.com</a> (Reservation Rewards) out of Connecticut is behind the scenes on all of the Intellius marketing practices, and probably contributes 25-40% of Intellius&#39; top line revenue for the last couple years.  They are the real ones you should be looking at and writing about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Bardon and John Lusk</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/comment-page-1/#comment-882563</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Bardon and John Lusk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 23:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107103#comment-882563</guid>
		<description>Max Bardon, President, and John Lusk, VP of Marketing at WhitePages here.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Customer feedback has been and will continue to be a critical driver of improvements we’re always seeking to make at WhitePages.  While we may not agree with everything in previous comments, we do strongly believe they will help us improve our service.  Check out our newly-launched site (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitepages.com/?CID=05002&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.whitepages.com/?CID=05002&lt;/a&gt;) to see this in action.  For example, we’ve made it easier to identify ads and determine where WhitePages ends and services offered by our advertisers begin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To be clear, WhitePages is not in the post-transaction marketing business, and there are a few other things in this blog post which we feel are inaccurate.  Advertisers allow us to offer our services for free and  US Search is just one of many advertisers who find value in WhitePages.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trust is core to our business.  It’s why we’re transparent about who we are, it’s why we engage in online communities and why we provide many ways for people to interact with us on our own sites.  We welcome any and all feedback.  Just send your questions and/or comments to &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:support@whitepages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;support@whitepages.com&lt;/a&gt; or feel free to engage us at &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.whitepages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blog.whitepages.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Max and John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max Bardon, President, and John Lusk, VP of Marketing at WhitePages here.  </p>
<p>Customer feedback has been and will continue to be a critical driver of improvements we’re always seeking to make at WhitePages.  While we may not agree with everything in previous comments, we do strongly believe they will help us improve our service.  Check out our newly-launched site (<a href="http://www.whitepages.com/?CID=05002" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitepages.com/?CID=05002</a>) to see this in action.  For example, we’ve made it easier to identify ads and determine where WhitePages ends and services offered by our advertisers begin.</p>
<p>To be clear, WhitePages is not in the post-transaction marketing business, and there are a few other things in this blog post which we feel are inaccurate.  Advertisers allow us to offer our services for free and  US Search is just one of many advertisers who find value in WhitePages.  </p>
<p>Trust is core to our business.  It’s why we’re transparent about who we are, it’s why we engage in online communities and why we provide many ways for people to interact with us on our own sites.  We welcome any and all feedback.  Just send your questions and/or comments to <a href="mailto:support@whitepages.com" rel="nofollow">support@whitepages.com</a> or feel free to engage us at <a href="http://blog.whitepages.com" rel="nofollow">blog.whitepages.com</a>.</p>
<p>Max and John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/comment-page-1/#comment-882552</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 22:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107103#comment-882552</guid>
		<description>Totally agree: you guys should be ashamed of your names.  This weekend, while you&#039;re visiting with your mothers for Mother&#039;s Day, take a moment to let her know how disgusted you are with your straight name.  Then change it to something gayer, like Nicki or Marco.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ubersite.com/m/91024&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.ubersite.com/m/91024&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree: you guys should be ashamed of your names.  This weekend, while you&#39;re visiting with your mothers for Mother&#39;s Day, take a moment to let her know how disgusted you are with your straight name.  Then change it to something gayer, like Nicki or Marco.  <a href="http://www.ubersite.com/m/91024" rel="nofollow">http://www.ubersite.com/m/91024</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Spitzer </title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/comment-page-1/#comment-882562</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Spitzer </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 22:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107103#comment-882562</guid>
		<description>Matt props to you. Best post of the week across the blogs I read.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bottom line is as follows. THEY ARE SHADY!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These companies are so shady and deceptive that my knees buckle when I read about them in the media.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your point &quot;...In other words, despite customer complaints by a minority, the vast majority of people seem to be putting up with these practices.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is completely wrong. How many thousands of people just don&#039;t report this to the BBB. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Look these guys have absolutely no shame scamming the public. What&#039;s laughable to me is Naveen Jain is attempting to take &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.Intelius.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.Intelius.com&lt;/a&gt; public. I am willing to bet this will be the biggest pump and dump in modern history when it hits the public markets. Actually, I don&#039;t think it will go public at all and hence why Jain is engaging with his comments - no quiet period for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt props to you. Best post of the week across the blogs I read.</p>
<p>Bottom line is as follows. THEY ARE SHADY!</p>
<p>These companies are so shady and deceptive that my knees buckle when I read about them in the media.</p>
<p>Your point &#8220;&#8230;In other words, despite customer complaints by a minority, the vast majority of people seem to be putting up with these practices.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is completely wrong. How many thousands of people just don&#39;t report this to the BBB. </p>
<p>Look these guys have absolutely no shame scamming the public. What&#39;s laughable to me is Naveen Jain is attempting to take <a href="http://www.Intelius.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Intelius.com</a> public. I am willing to bet this will be the biggest pump and dump in modern history when it hits the public markets. Actually, I don&#39;t think it will go public at all and hence why Jain is engaging with his comments &#8211; no quiet period for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Godin</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/comment-page-1/#comment-882561</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Godin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 21:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107103#comment-882561</guid>
		<description>The qulaity of data on Intelius&#039; AT&amp;T application  isn&#039;t nearly up to par with WhitePages&#039; MSN site on this &quot;free&quot; search.  I wonder if the data is intentionally dumbed down to drive traffic to the paid services...?  Or maybe the product just isn&#039;t as good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The qulaity of data on Intelius&#39; AT&#038;T application  isn&#39;t nearly up to par with WhitePages&#39; MSN site on this &#8220;free&#8221; search.  I wonder if the data is intentionally dumbed down to drive traffic to the paid services&#8230;?  Or maybe the product just isn&#39;t as good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intelius</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/comment-page-1/#comment-882560</link>
		<dc:creator>Intelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 21:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107103#comment-882560</guid>
		<description>There are a couple of important points to note regarding Alex&#039;s (&lt;a href=&quot;http://whitepages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;whitepages.com&lt;/a&gt; CEO) comments. First, according to  both ComScore and Hitwise, a substantially large portion of all users who visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://Whitepages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Whitepages.com&lt;/a&gt; end up going to USSearch. In addition, over 70% of all USSearch&#039;s users come from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://Whitepages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Whitepages.com&lt;/a&gt;. USSearch is completely dependent on &lt;a href=&quot;http://Whitepages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Whitepages.com&lt;/a&gt; for its survival and vice versa. &lt;a href=&quot;http://Whitepages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Whitepages.com&lt;/a&gt; is simply trying to hide behind  another company to do its dirty work but is collecting all the rewards. USSearch has been an exclusive provider for &lt;a href=&quot;http://whitepages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;whitepages.com&lt;/a&gt; to provide these deceptive services for several years. Any which way you look at it, these companies are joined at the hip like Bonnie and Clyde.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;One has to agree completely agree with the personal observation that John Cook, Editor of TechFlash made that WhitePages&#039; post transaction marketing offers just keep coming and coming, making it nearly impossible to get to those records requests. He is also not alone when he said that he was left wondering why anyone would use this service.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The fact that the majority of Intelius revenue comes from its repeat customers proves that Intelius provides valuable services and our customers find our advertising clear and transparent. All advertising on Intelius is reviewed and approved by our privacy and Consumer protection committee to make sure that it meets the highest standards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We invite everyone to try out Intelius free service that we offer to our partner AT&amp;T (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yellowpages.com/findaperson&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.yellowpages.com/findaperson&lt;/a&gt;) and compare it with the service that &lt;a href=&quot;http://Whitepages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Whitepages.com&lt;/a&gt; provides to MSN (shown above). You should try to go through the system end-to-end when you find no results to see how the two services compare. You will come to the same conclusion as everyone else that Intelius partners get substantially superior service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a couple of important points to note regarding Alex&#39;s (<a href="http://whitepages.com" rel="nofollow">whitepages.com</a> CEO) comments. First, according to  both ComScore and Hitwise, a substantially large portion of all users who visit <a href="http://Whitepages.com" rel="nofollow">Whitepages.com</a> end up going to USSearch. In addition, over 70% of all USSearch&#39;s users come from the <a href="http://Whitepages.com" rel="nofollow">Whitepages.com</a>. USSearch is completely dependent on <a href="http://Whitepages.com" rel="nofollow">Whitepages.com</a> for its survival and vice versa. <a href="http://Whitepages.com" rel="nofollow">Whitepages.com</a> is simply trying to hide behind  another company to do its dirty work but is collecting all the rewards. USSearch has been an exclusive provider for <a href="http://whitepages.com" rel="nofollow">whitepages.com</a> to provide these deceptive services for several years. Any which way you look at it, these companies are joined at the hip like Bonnie and Clyde.</p>
<p>One has to agree completely agree with the personal observation that John Cook, Editor of TechFlash made that WhitePages&#39; post transaction marketing offers just keep coming and coming, making it nearly impossible to get to those records requests. He is also not alone when he said that he was left wondering why anyone would use this service.</p>
<p>The fact that the majority of Intelius revenue comes from its repeat customers proves that Intelius provides valuable services and our customers find our advertising clear and transparent. All advertising on Intelius is reviewed and approved by our privacy and Consumer protection committee to make sure that it meets the highest standards.</p>
<p>We invite everyone to try out Intelius free service that we offer to our partner AT&#038;T (<a href="http://www.yellowpages.com/findaperson" rel="nofollow">http://www.yellowpages.com/findaperson</a>) and compare it with the service that <a href="http://Whitepages.com" rel="nofollow">Whitepages.com</a> provides to MSN (shown above). You should try to go through the system end-to-end when you find no results to see how the two services compare. You will come to the same conclusion as everyone else that Intelius partners get substantially superior service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stown</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/comment-page-1/#comment-882559</link>
		<dc:creator>Stown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107103#comment-882559</guid>
		<description>Good post here, and thanks for detailing out the &#039;slick&#039; side of Whitepages&#039; business. My problem with Whitepages USSearch relationship is that it&#039;s completely designed around playing the odds of a customer making a mistake. At it&#039;s best this is an inconsiderate business practice towards Whitepages&#039; customers, and the fact that it is such a visible and well-promoted piece of their site doesn&#039;t give Whitepages any right to throw up their hands and say they can&#039;t control what their advertisers do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&#039;s hoping, as you mentioned, that the lure of better products (like their Blackberry app) can ween WP off of this shady relationship. But knowing Alex, I doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post here, and thanks for detailing out the &#39;slick&#39; side of Whitepages&#39; business. My problem with Whitepages USSearch relationship is that it&#39;s completely designed around playing the odds of a customer making a mistake. At it&#39;s best this is an inconsiderate business practice towards Whitepages&#39; customers, and the fact that it is such a visible and well-promoted piece of their site doesn&#39;t give Whitepages any right to throw up their hands and say they can&#39;t control what their advertisers do.</p>
<p>Here&#39;s hoping, as you mentioned, that the lure of better products (like their Blackberry app) can ween WP off of this shady relationship. But knowing Alex, I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fact-Check</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/comment-page-1/#comment-882558</link>
		<dc:creator>Fact-Check</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107103#comment-882558</guid>
		<description>USsearch.com&#039;s sole purpose of existence is to serve and do the dirty work for &lt;a href=&quot;http://whitepages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;whitepages.com&lt;/a&gt;. Almost all of the users that visit ussearch come from &lt;a href=&quot;http://whitepages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;whitepages.com&lt;/a&gt;. Alex&#039;s comments are so far from the truth and reality. He is essentially saying that we are not doing anything bad because we outsource all the dirty work to someone else eventhough we  collect all the money from them anyway for the dirty work. It&#039;s so nice to see truth finally coming out on whitepages&#039;s scammy practices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USsearch.com&#39;s sole purpose of existence is to serve and do the dirty work for <a href="http://whitepages.com" rel="nofollow">whitepages.com</a>. Almost all of the users that visit ussearch come from <a href="http://whitepages.com" rel="nofollow">whitepages.com</a>. Alex&#39;s comments are so far from the truth and reality. He is essentially saying that we are not doing anything bad because we outsource all the dirty work to someone else eventhough we  collect all the money from them anyway for the dirty work. It&#39;s so nice to see truth finally coming out on whitepages&#39;s scammy practices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finally</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/comment-page-1/#comment-882557</link>
		<dc:creator>Finally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107103#comment-882557</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice to see &lt;a href=&quot;http://Whitepages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Whitepages.com&lt;/a&gt; getting exposed for their scam, Here is a company that wanted to make all the money from the deception and now that the scam is exposed they are left with shifting the blame to someone else. I think it&#039;s time to fess up to the crime when they are caught with your hands in the cookie jar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s nice to see <a href="http://Whitepages.com" rel="nofollow">Whitepages.com</a> getting exposed for their scam, Here is a company that wanted to make all the money from the deception and now that the scam is exposed they are left with shifting the blame to someone else. I think it&#39;s time to fess up to the crime when they are caught with your hands in the cookie jar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Marshall</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/comment-page-1/#comment-882556</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 10:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107103#comment-882556</guid>
		<description>who&#039;d have thunk? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who&#39;d have thunk? <img src='http://venturebeat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/07/the-background-check-scams-is-whitepages-really-better-than-intelius/comment-page-1/#comment-882555</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 10:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107103#comment-882555</guid>
		<description>LOL - reasonable critique  = conspiracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL &#8211; reasonable critique  = conspiracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
