<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone users eating up AT&amp;T&#8217;s network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/11/iphone-users-eating-up-atts-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/11/iphone-users-eating-up-atts-network/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:19:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay Cuthrell</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/11/iphone-users-eating-up-atts-network/comment-page-1/#comment-862900</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Cuthrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107220#comment-862900</guid>
		<description>AT&amp;T has started but it is limited to Qwest customers that already have land lines with ADSL&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://press.qwestapps.com/index.cfm?fa=press.view&amp;pressReleaseId=56937&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://press.qwestapps.com/index.cfm?fa=press.v...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, this isn&#039;t really as AT&amp;T powered as much as it is one of the patchwork acquisitions performed by AT&amp;T&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gigaom.com/2008/11/06/att-buys-wayport-to-keep-iphone-users-happy/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://gigaom.com/2008/11/06/att-buys-wayport-t...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Basically, AT&amp;T is doing everything possible to avoid investment in their network&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Here’s what AT&amp;T quietly released a few days ago as some kind of “oh, it’s not a backhaul issue” blurb… and yet, for all the talk — it’s still masking the actual issue: Lack of capacity planning.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/05/10/att-to-begin-implementing-n-set-in-an-effort-to-reduce-3g-network-strain/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/05/10/att-t...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AT&amp;T has to improve their backhaul. I haven’t seen that hit the press anywhere yet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Contrast this with Verizon who has offered to sell access (this heads off any government intervention… i.e. these guys aren’t dumb) to their wireless (fiber) backhaul network.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gigaom.com/2009/03/26/verizon-rents-out-its-fiber-for-lte-backhaul/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://gigaom.com/2009/03/26/verizon-rents-out-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, in summary: backhaul is something a lot of folks don’t know about but goes to explain a great deal of the frustration people have with the mobile Internet as we know it today (you know, as regularly paying monthly consumers).&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/05/11/center-for-disease-control-releases-report-on-wireless-families-one-in-five-fams-are-cellphone-only/#comment-439728&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/05/11/center-f...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&#038;T has started but it is limited to Qwest customers that already have land lines with ADSL</p>
<p><a href="http://press.qwestapps.com/index.cfm?fa=press.view&#038;pressReleaseId=56937" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://press.qwestapps.com/index.cfm?fa=press.v.." rel="nofollow">http://press.qwestapps.com/index.cfm?fa=press.v..</a>.</p>
<p>However, this isn&#39;t really as AT&#038;T powered as much as it is one of the patchwork acquisitions performed by AT&#038;T</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/11/06/att-buys-wayport-to-keep-iphone-users-happy/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/11/06/att-buys-wayport-t.." rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2008/11/06/att-buys-wayport-t..</a>.</p>
<p>Basically, AT&#038;T is doing everything possible to avoid investment in their network</p>
<p>&#8220;Here’s what AT&#038;T quietly released a few days ago as some kind of “oh, it’s not a backhaul issue” blurb… and yet, for all the talk — it’s still masking the actual issue: Lack of capacity planning.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/05/10/att-to-begin-implementing-n-set-in-an-effort-to-reduce-3g-network-strain/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/05/10/att-t.." rel="nofollow">http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/05/10/att-t..</a>.</p>
<p>AT&#038;T has to improve their backhaul. I haven’t seen that hit the press anywhere yet.</p>
<p>Contrast this with Verizon who has offered to sell access (this heads off any government intervention… i.e. these guys aren’t dumb) to their wireless (fiber) backhaul network.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/03/26/verizon-rents-out-its-fiber-for-lte-backhaul/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/03/26/verizon-rents-out-.." rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2009/03/26/verizon-rents-out-..</a>.</p>
<p>So, in summary: backhaul is something a lot of folks don’t know about but goes to explain a great deal of the frustration people have with the mobile Internet as we know it today (you know, as regularly paying monthly consumers).&#8221;</p>
<p>source: <a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/05/11/center-for-disease-control-releases-report-on-wireless-families-one-in-five-fams-are-cellphone-only/#comment-439728" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/05/11/center-f.." rel="nofollow">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/05/11/center-f..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HereAndNow</title>
		<link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/11/iphone-users-eating-up-atts-network/comment-page-1/#comment-862899</link>
		<dc:creator>HereAndNow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 03:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/?p=107220#comment-862899</guid>
		<description>This is why WiFi is such an important &quot;companion&quot; for 3G. The more people use WiFi, the less strain there is on the more expensive 3G bandwidth. Perhaps AT&amp;T should consider building out and promoting their WiFi network more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why WiFi is such an important &#8220;companion&#8221; for 3G. The more people use WiFi, the less strain there is on the more expensive 3G bandwidth. Perhaps AT&#038;T should consider building out and promoting their WiFi network more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
