Sequoia’s Moritz grills California’s controller on state budget issues

downloadMike Moritz, key player at Sequoia Capital, posed tough questions to California controller John Chiang regarding the state’s economy and budget deficit at yesterday’s Churchill Club breakfast in the Silicon Valley.

With the state’s deficit growing to an unprecedented $26 billion, Moritz asked Chiang whether California had become fiscally “ungovernable,” and if not, what his ideas were for fixing the increasingly dire situation. He also mentioned the cash deficit, now running close to $25 billion.

“When many of us came to California 30 or so years ago, California had a reputation around the world as the place that knows how,” Moritz said at the breakfast. “Today California is known as the ghost of the future of the U.S.”

In response, Chiang was very frank about the state’s situation. California “has not been net cash flow positive since July 12, 2007,” he said. But there’s not much he can do about it as controller. The budget is the responsibility of the governor and the legislature. And any remedies Chiang could implement himself must also go through the governor.

For example, the state has been borrowing money from its own emergency funds set aside for natural disasters, and borrowing from the market. It is also delaying payment of bills and calling in past IOUs. All of these actions are a stop gap as the governor and legislature work out an agreement.

john_chiang_250xOther than this brand of political maneuvering, Chiang said that — in the long-term — eliminating term limits would be helpful, as would getting rid of the rule requiring a two-third majority to approve a budget or raise taxes. He also said that turning over control of education spending to local areas and cutting spending in state agencies would go a long way.

In the course of the conversation, Moritz pitched the idea of a tax on gasoline that could be used to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the state. Predictably, Chiang responded that the electorate wouldn’t go for that kind of measure (an understatement). He also declined to go into detail about the California State Teachers Retirement System and the California Public Employees Retirement System, the state’s two largest pension funds. All he said is that the funds haven’t defaulted on any of their obligations to investment firms.

Next Story: Adobe Wave: Lets publishers “wave” hi to users directly from the desktop
Previous Story: New York sues social network Tagged for alleged email invite scam

Bookmark and Share
Photo of Camille Ricketts

About the Author, Camille Ricketts

Camille is the lead writer for GreenBeat. She came to VentureBeat from Google where she worked on its traditional platforms team, particularly in TV. Before that, she was a reporter for the Wall Street Journal in New York and London. Follow her on Twitter at @camillericketts, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

With GreenBeat 2009, VentureBeat's all-star conference on all things Smart Grid, coming up in November, Camille will be expanding coverage of this exciting space. Stay up to date by following @greenbeat2009 on Twitter or by becoming a fan of the event on Facebook here.

  • ajolie11
    John Chiang, what a loser. Get a grip and a backbone.
  • California “has not been net cash flow positive since July 12, 2007,” he said.

    Wot? Since when has any government ever been cash-flow positive? What on earth can this mean?
  • tiffanyandlinks
    Official Ed Hardy Store for all Clothing and Gear. Buy Direct and Save. Inspired by Christian Audigier, the lifestyle brand includes
    Ed Hardy
    Ed Hardy Women Swimwear
    Ed Hardy Women T-Shirts
    ED Hardy womens Hoodies
    ED Hardy Womens Jeans
    Ed Hardy Womens Lingerie
    ED Hardy Womens Shoes
    Ed Hardy Womens Tanks
    cheap ed hardy
  • pesca
    I attended this meeting, and I would not call it a "grilling", more a light sautee.

    One thing I learned from Chiang was that California's Constitution puts spending on education above the need to balance the budget. That explains some of the mess.

    The other notions about term limits and the 2/3 majority on tax-raising is standard Democratic fare. Guess what? Taxes were raised anyway (car registration, sales tax). The last proposition ballot showed that Californians are unanimous in rejecting more taxation.

    Gotta spend less, guys! Are Democrats going to do it? Of course not!