Digg will finally allow other sites, apps to add content

kevinreverseSocial news site Digg, founded by camera-friendly CEO Kevin Rose (pictured), is still going strong even if it has been edged out of the limelight by Facebook and Twitter. Digg is now developing a new application programming interface (API), however, that’ll make it much easier for developers of other websites, and those who make applications for either desktops or phones, to integrate Digg into their creations.

The API will allow other websites or applications to submit new entries for Digg and will undoubtedly encourage software developers to enable their sites and apps to publish links to interesting URLs on Digg automatically, rather than requiring a human user to click through the steps currently required to submit an item.

The enhancements are described, at a programmerly level that get a bit technical, on a Google Groups discussion forum for Digg’s API. The new programming hooks, wrote Digg software developer Jeff Hodsdon, will work much like those already developed by Flickr and Facebook, which now allows comments to be read and posted from outside Facebook. (In technical jargon, Digg’s API will be RESTful.)

diggcutDigg has been slow to add some of the hooks that Facebook and Twitter developers eagerly added to their social networks. But as soon as it’s possible to submit a story to Digg with one click, or to create a bot that looks for stories to submit to Digg automatically, the result will be a much larger trove of submitted material upon which Digg members can vote or “digg” which submissions they find the most worthy of recommending to others.

Depending on the API’s reach, it may also be possible to give users of other sites and apps a button they can click that will submit an item to Digg, or vote for an existing item’s popularity, without directing the user away from their current app or Web page.

The end result? More items submitted to Digg and more votes cast on those items. Digg, once the poster child for Web 2.0 user-generated content, has fallen behind Facebook and Twitter in pop-culture buzz. By making it easy for those of us who don’t want to spend all day hanging around digg.com to send items to Digg, and hopefully to vote on them, Digg could bring itself back to the foreground.

[Photo by ojbyrne]

Next Story: Berkeley Ventures kicks off with four new startups
Previous Story: Only on the Internet: Get paid to wear a company’s shirt

Bookmark and Share

Tags: ,

Photo of Paul Boutin

About the Author, Paul Boutin

Paul (paul@venturebeat.com) covers Apple & the iPhone, social networks & social media, digital music & video, and any crazy Internet story. Paul wrote and edited for Valleywag from 2006-2008, after several years with Wired magazine and Slate. He writes regularly for The New York Times' technology section and sometimes for Wired and The Wall Street Journal. He studied computer science at MIT in the early 1980s, and worked as a software developer and network administrator for 15 years before becoming a professional writer. Follow him on Twitter at @paulboutin, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • sebastian20
    No matter how many good and interesting stories will be submitted to Digg.com, the most dugg will remain those titled "Why Slow Sex is Better", "You Win: One Free Internet (PIC)" or "Pikachu!". There are too many immature users and too few digging stories about Politics etc. I can't believe that Digg was intended to be a site where geeks show their friends the allegedly hilarious stuff they found on the Internet but rather an index for all the good blog articles and news stories the web has to offer.
  • It's true and also the bigg name diggers have the attention and get paid to promote some sites or keep plugging their own sites.

    Most diggers only digg on the frontpage and what's sent to them by friend or big name diggers. This is bad as it will promote spamming of sites. The upcoming sections will be filled with even more spam and there will be numerous postings from same sites to spam up results.
  • In light of digg's short URL redirect, I doubt they'll allow too much from happening without having to visit their site. (Good article Paul.)
  • bigeastfootballtrivia
    That is some amazing news. I think that Digg needed something to boost PR around its site and get it back in the news in a positive way.

    Ashely :)
    http://www.answerblip.com/social-networking-inf...
  • Good news. I too think that Digg needed something to boost around its site and get it back in the news in a positive way
  • zzdinko
    Wow, that is just WAY too cool!

    RT
    www.anon-web-tools.net.tc
  • Digg needs to improve in various items, anyway I think that it is a tool very useful between professionals from different areas.
  • danny
    Kevin is NOT the CEO, he is officially the "Chief Architect." Jay Adelson is the CEO. http://digg.com/about/jay
  • Mark2100
    Small grammar point. Kevin Rose is camera hungry. Sienna Miller is camera friendly. I thank you.