AMD to launch combo graphics-microprocessor chips in 2011

amdAdvanced Micro Devices released new details on its long-awaited Fusion chips, which combine graphics and microprocessor functions into a single chip in a computing platform that will launch in 2011.

Rick Bergman, senior vice president and general manager of AMD products (right), said at the company’s analyst meeting today that AMD is preparing a whole series of Fusion chips that will be made using a 32-nanometer manufacturing process that will be ready for full-scale production in 2011.

The chips will hit new targets in power efficiency, performance, and size and could be used in powerful desktop computers as well as the smallest netbooks, which are smaller than laptops and are meant for surfing the web.

These chips will have more than a billion transistors on them, Bergman said, but will likely be smaller and less powerful than separate, stand-alone microprocessor or graphics chips that launch in the same time frame.

The point is that they eliminate a chip in the PC system, cutting out costs and processing bottlenecks. The new chips also puts pressure on Intel and Nvidia, which make separate chips.

Samples of these chips will be sent to customers in the first half of 2010. They’re on schedule for production in late 2010 and will likely appear in customer PCs in 2011, Bergman said. That’s a shorter timeline than ever before. AMD has been promising Fusion chips since it acquired ATI Technologies for $5.4 billion in 2006. But it has delayed the launch, due to the difficulty of designing combination chips. Today’s schedule is consistent with the roadmap AMD announced a year ago.

One of the chips under design is code-named Llano. It will have four microprocessor cores, or computing brains, as well as a powerful graphics core that can handle the latest Microsoft DX11 graphics technology. A second chip in the works is code-named Ontario, which will have two microprocessor cores and a graphics core. By comparison, AMD plans to have a 12-core microprocessor on the market by 2010. As you can see, it’s easier to fit more cores on a stand-alone microprocessor than it is on a hybrid chip.

AMD calls these hybrid chips APUs, for accelerated processing units, compared to central processing units (CPUs, or microprocessors) or graphics processing units (GPUs). In other news, AMD executives said they expect to operate profitably from now on, or at least that is the major goal.

Next Story:
Previous Story:

Photo of Dean Takahashi

About the Author, Dean Takahashi

Dean is lead writer for GamesBeat at VentureBeat. He covers video games, security, chips and a variety of other subjects. Dean previously worked at the San Jose Mercury News, the Wall Street Journal, the Red Herring, the Los Angeles Times, the Orange County Register and the Dallas Times Herald. He is the author of two books, Opening the Xbox and the Xbox 360 Uncloaked. Follow him on Twitter at @deantak, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • AJC
    Intel will bribe retailers and manufacturers to keep AMD's market share from increasing more than a few percent. Hooray for innovation.
  • sy
    Actually, Intel will have its own "Sandy Bridge" out at the same time-frame.
    Innovation is what drives both companies.
  • asd
    stupid, no more independent upgrades. Everyone upgrades vid cards much more frequently than CPUs.
  • Ok this is a good idea. The only thing is that it is supposedly already done in gaming consoles. Next problem is how does one upgrade graphics without upgrading or replacing cpu? What is the solution for this. I dont know about you but every pc or laptop I have owned has had the graphics replaced as soon as i got it. How are you going to do this now? Just my question and opinion, I might not totally understand the concept. Please explain if I am not getting something.
  • sy
    The idea is to get the GPU close to the CPU, this clears one of the worst bottle-necks in the system - the PCIE bus (just think how much data can flow between the CPU and GPU when they are closer, and working at ~ 3 GHz.

    The PCIE will still be there, and you can always ad an external card (like you do with on-board GPUs today). Technicaly, I think the system can use both of them at the same time.

    This solution is here to replace the on-board GPUs, not the high-end cards.
  • leec
    How does this compete with Intel's Larrabee? My impression is that Larrabee will be out before Fusion.
  • sy
    Larrabee is a discreet graphics card. It will compete against ATI / NVIDIA high-end graphics, not against this. Again, intel will have a competing offer - named "sandy bridge", which will also include a GPU on the same die as the CPU. If I remember correctly, they also talk about 4 CPU cores + GPU.

    It's probable that AMD will have better graphics performance, and intel will have better CPU performance. The price will win the consumer
  • abercrombie0
    Everything will be all right,I am behind you.That’s something,That's what I was thinking.Brilliant idea.iphone club
  • I prefer AMD because they keep the same socket design mostly. It is easy to pull an AMD 64X2 3800 AM2 and upgrade to 64X2 6000 without having to replace the system board. Even on the server end, upgrading the Opteron processors is simple and one can change from say...an Opteron X2 to X4 while using the same socket.
blog comments powered by Disqus