3 ways Bing is ahead of Google

binghomeThis morning, Microsoft employees demonstrated a long list of enhancements to their Bing search engine at a press event at the company’s San Francisco office.

That office is next door to the city’s newest, splashiest, most expensive shopping center, the Westfield, and after sitting through the Bing demo, I’m sure Microsoft parked its employees next to a mall on purpose. Many new Bing improvements, such as maps with interactive driving directions, are mere catch-up to what Google has done for years. But others, driven by heavy market research aimed at finding ways Google is missing the mark, show how very much the kind of people who use the Internet has changed since a few years ago.

In short, the people who use search engines today are nothing like the people who build them. Online, the normals have finally displaced the geeks.

Here are three ways the new audience’s demands differ from the early adopters.

  1. unixDon’t give me a link to the answer. Just give me the answer. The Internet used to be populated by precocious people who liked math, science, and technology for its own sake. If they had a question, they preferred to be shown where and how to get the answer for themselves. Today, Bing’s target audience is much broader and much less intellectual. Google’s stated mission, “to organize the world’s information,” sounds tiring or even intimidating. Bing is being marketed as a replacement for long, 30-minute-plus Google search sessions that some people love and most people don’t. The slogan on Microsoft’s PowerPoint slides today was, “Bing is the faster way to more informed decisions.” I’m not convinced yet that Bing is better or faster at decision-making, but it’s an appealing promise.
  2. bingvideoPictures are better than words. Visual Search is one of the Bing crew’s favorite features to lead with in presentations. They don’t bother trying to convince anyone that their top ten Web results are more relevant, more all-inclusive, or fresher than Google’s. Instead, Bing uses every opportunity possible to put lots of images and video on the page. A search for Joe Biden on Google today is topped by news items in which Biden comments on the latest Beltway scandal. Bing, instead, returns no news, but a half dozen photos of Joe above his Wikipedia entry. Tech workers raised on command-line interfaces and plain text email wince whenever their browsers spew images onto the screen. Once the authority figures on the Internet, they’re now a forgotten minority of cranky old men.
  3. bingharvardI’m totally fine with getting search results from a Microsoft database of multimedia celebrity flash cards instead of from the entire Internet, if it tells me what I want to know. A large number of searches are quick-reference requests for things like the weather and celebrity photos and stats. Bing meets this market-researched need by crafting what its developers call “cards” for frequently searched people, places and things. These short lists of a picture plus basic stats on the person, place or thing are displayed above the traditional Web links. According to the Bing folks, these canned answers test better than the links. I believe them, because Yahoo’s search team gave reporters a demo earlier this year where they said their tests came back the same: Most people like having a canned answer atop the results, as long as they can trust that it’s correct. What’s the top reason most people hit a search engine? Bing researchers found that it’s to decide what to wear, based on the weather outside. You don’t need t0 search every page on the Internet to figure that out.

Google is groping its way toward this same change in what its audience wants, but you can almost feel the intellectual hesitation. I have to admit, I’m not sure I want Google to become more like Bing. I’d rather have my choice. But Bing hasn’t grabbed one-tenth of the world’s search engine traffic in just a few months by luck, or by advertising. They did it by figuring out correctly what people actually want.

Next Story:
Previous Story:

Tags:

Companies:




Photo of Paul Boutin

About the Author, Paul Boutin

Paul (paul@venturebeat.com) covers Apple & the iPhone, social networks & social media, digital music & video, and any crazy Internet story. Paul wrote and edited for Valleywag from 2006-2008, after several years with Wired magazine and Slate. He writes regularly for The New York Times' Personal Tech section and sometimes for Wired and The Wall Street Journal. He studied computer science at MIT in the early 1980s, and worked as a software developer and network administrator for 15 years before becoming a professional writer. Follow him on Twitter at @paulboutin, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • I believe that Bing still has a way to go before they can out do Google. I will say that Bing has definitely improved in the last year or so.

    Cheers
  • What I’m missing in this article is the pretty obvious explanation: due to layout with the left-hand navigation of Bing, the natural results are more towards the centre of the screen than on Google. So the distance between the natural results and the ads is less. So it’s pretty obvious more people will notice the ads.

    Don’t need eyetracking to know that, although eyetracking confirms what every usability expert would have ‘guessed’
  • Hivon
    I've given Bing a try and have compared numerous search queries from both search engines and frankly, Google provides a "better" (read: still not perfect) set of results every time.
  • You might be happy finding results from an internal microsoft database of celebrates, and sometimes
    that might be fine. But if I connect to a tool to search the internet, its because I want to search the internet. Its quite a different thing to be searching for generic answers, and to be searching for a website, and perphaps its needs two different engines for the two different tasks. In fact many bings answers come not from bing but from Wolfram researchs alpha answer engine.
  • Microsoft launched new search engine that is called bing.It's good new for bing that it is good in 3 matter then the google.It's give search result as the card and you can get all information from that card.
  • I think that Bing has a long way to go to get into the language of the every day person.
    There are so many times I have answered a question from someone by saying 'Just Google it'
    Choice is great but I still believe Bing has a long way to go to become a default for people and in the end is more likely to be a back up choice if you can't find it on Google.
    http://www.onesherpa.com
  • I agree with wanting a choice in search engines. 99% of my searches are still through Google. Sometimes I use Bing for more specialized stuff and I never use Yahoo. Google has been working on a lot of changes, but when you have the size share that Google has those new features need a lot more testing and careful deployment than what Bing can do.
  • Got binged
    The documentinteropinitiative.org web site proudly proclaims that it's powered by Bing, but I've been unable to manage even simple phrase searches like "code page" (there are dozens of matches on the site, but Bing can't find them). I hope it's not powered by the latest version of Bing.
  • mikegale
    I use both Bing and Google.

    The tone of this article bothers me.

    One way to interpret the write up is "the old world was made up of people who thought about things and came to the own conclusions, the new world of people who are not like that. Google serves the former Bing the latter. And the former are, thankfully, being put down."

    There is a broad spectrum of people, we need ways to serve them all, I'd like to get away from the thinking that "we'll force this thinking down everbody's throats, whether they like it or not". I detect that thinking here.

    Competing search engines and "search engines that do what you actually want" can help us get the experience we want. We're a long way off but let's not vent spleen on people we've decided to hate. Cool it.
  • myd
    I agree with Mike Gale's comment above. This article is so overly reductive it's intellectually worthless. I doesn't seem like the author put much thought into this post.
  • chicohash
    Why trust an MS product...everything they do is poop.
  • chicohash
    Told ya' - Never trust an MS product.

    Bing DOWN: Microsoft's Search Engine Crashes
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/03/bing-down-microsofts-sear_n_379588.html
  • robert
    Is that a joke?
  • chicohash
    No Joke.
  • robert
    My point was that you are saying microsoft writes poop software and then to prove your point you link to an article about Bing going offline for 30minutes
  • bingbing
    yeah..quite happy with bing ..though they have long way to go.
  • robert
    I agree. I really like Bing and use it more and more. Even though if I cannot find what I need on Bing I look on Google too (and then don't find it there either). The maps is off to a GREAT start. And yes they do have a long way to go.
  • Totoist
    Yeah, yeah, okay, Bing -- and Microsoft? -- suggest that they've got a new and better thing going. So now where do I find the bird's eye views I used to go to Bing for? I mean, haven't been able to locate, amongst all the introductory text cluttering up the page, a site I can click on where aerial photos (and bird's eye views) can, I hope, still be found. And, jeez, I hope the new Bing resources don't preclude going back and forth between and Bing and Google. I mean, I can still you BOTH, right?
  • Click "Maps". It's linked on every single page of Bing. Any map can be switched to bird's eye view, by clicking where it says "Aerial" with the down pointing arrow. It drops down an option list, and bird's eye is the second option.
  • Totoist
    Okay, Dan, got it. Was able to bring up some bird's eye views, etc. Would like to try out the street view resource, which is supposed to be 3-E, and free of Google's "light speed" blurring,etc., but I haven't been able to figure out how to do that. I'm new on the web anyway, and tend to flounder, initially, when trying to learn stuff. Incidentally, amongst all the Bing sites, there's one entitled: Your web browser and the Maps site are incompatible. What's the deal with that? I run Internet Explorer 8, and already have Silverlight. In fact, I removed the Silverlight I had, then installed the one provided by Bing, just to make sure I had the most recent version.
  • Steve
    Three ways Bing is behind Google:
    - no search by specific file types
    - Google Books!
    - no Scholar search...
    as a scholar, Bing is worthless. Maybe for those not able to read, Bing may be better!
  • Bill
  • robert
    Would you rather Microsoft try to copy everything Google does? Isn't that the criticism most people have towards Microsoft? For once they have something that is truly a differentiator.
  • You don't need to be a scholar to read. I'm pretty sure I wasn't a scholar in kindergarten.
  • FirstPinkGirl
    Hmm. And you can use any Adobe service or site without installing Flash? right.
  • Joe
    To hell with Silverlight, the fact that MS pushes it on you and makes all these services unusable without it offends me and makes me never want to use any of it
  • Will
    All the core features work without Silverlight -- search, maps, etc. It's just some of the fancy value-add stuff that requires Silverlight, like Visual Search and 3D-mapped view in Bing Maps. Considering that Google does Street View in Flash, and doesn't do Visual Search at all, this seems like a weak complaint.
  • It's more of the right tool for the right job choice. A lot of things the Silverlight version of Bing Maps can do are just simply impossible in AJAX in its current incarnation.
  • Whys
    "...Bing hasn’t grabbed one-tenth of the world’s search engine traffic in just a few months by luck, or by advertising. They did it by figuring out correctly what people actually want."

    Actually... they did by buying Yahoo and sneaking the Bing search bar into Java updates. Yet they are still far behind Google and that she come as no surprise. Ballmer all but said that Microsoft only bought Yahoo to collect data on user's searches for market analytics, NOT to produce better search results. Hardly a road to long term success.
  • robert
    Google doesn't sneak its search bar into other products?
  • Bing's search share is completely their own. Yahoo! is not serving Bing results, not for a long long time.
  • moo
    Bing search share isn't exactly "their own", in that they didn't grab 10% in just a few months.

    They got the traffic from MSN search, which is at least 8-9% of that.

    1-2% on their own, perhaps.
  • Whys
    3 ways Bing is BEHIND Google:

    1.) Market share.
    2.) Customer loyalty.
    3.) Verbing. ;)
  • Tergiversator_Maximus
    4) Not crashing.
  • robert
    You are correct on number 1. But not on number 2. I don't know if Bing will ever surpass Google in market share but I will say this...I have never used Bing maps for anything but I will definitely use it now. I was strictly a Google maps user but not anymore.
  • I feel the SAME. Google is ahead in very aspect.
  • I feel the SAME. There are only 3 aspects in which search engines can differ, and these are the 3. Verbing is the most important. Google is ahead because of its verbing.
  • I want to add the one , & that is Google's SIMPLICITY.
  • People used to tout Google's technical superiority over Bing. It seems now the Google apologists have resorted to the argument of those intangible elements, like customer loyalty or verbing.

    I can see Bing is definitely winning mind shares.
blog comments powered by Disqus