Updated: Android wallpaper app that takes your data was downloaded by millions

[Update: Google has reviewed the wallpaper apps and lifted the ban on them.]

A questionable Android mobile wallpaper app that collects your personal data and sends it to a mysterious site in China, has been downloaded millions of times, according to data unearthed by mobile security firm Lookout.

That means that apps that seem good but are really stealing your personal information are a big risk at a time when mobile apps are exploding on smartphones, said John Hering, chief executive, and Kevin MaHaffey, chief technology officer at Lookout, in their talk at the Black Hat security conference in Las Vegas today. (See our roundup of all Black Hat and Defcon stories).

“Even good apps can be modified to turn bad after a lot of people download it,” MaHaffey said. “Users absolutely have to pay attention to what they download. And developers have to be responsible about the data that they collect and how they use it.”

The app in question came from Jackeey Wallpaper, and it was uploaded to the Android Market, where users can download it and use it to decorate their phones that run the Google Android operating system. It includes branded wallpapers from My Little Pony and Star Wars, to name just a couple.

Update: Lookout notes it does not capture browsing history and text messages. It collects your browsing history, text messages, your phone number, subscriber identification, and even your voicemail phone number password, as long as it is programmed automatically into your phone. It sends the data to a web site, http://www.imnet.us. That site is evidently owned by someone in Shenzhen, China. The app has been downloaded anywhere from 1.1 million to 4.6 million times. The exact number isn’t known because the Android Market doesn’t offer precise data. The search through the data showed that Jackeey Wallpaper and another developer known as iceskysl@1sters! (which could possibly be the same developer, as they use similar code) were collecting personal data. The wallpaper app asks for permission to access your “phone calls,” but that isn’t necessarily a clear warning. While suspicious, Lookout says there isn’t evidence of malicious behavior.

The Lookout executives found the questionable app as part of their App Genome Project. Lookout is a mobile security firm, and it logged data from more than 100,000 free Android and iPhone apps as part of the project to analyze how apps behave. It found that the apps access your personal data quite often. On Android, each user is asked if they give their permission to access an app, but on the iPhone, where Apple approves apps, no permission is needed.

Roughly 47 percent of Android apps access some kind of third-party code, while 23 percent of iPhone apps do. The executives also found that many apps use third-party software programs to do things such as feed ads into an app. Often, developers unquestioningly use the software development kits of those third parties in their apps, even if they don’t know what they do. In many cases, there is a good reason for the use of personal information. Ads, for instance, can be better targeted if the app knows a user’s location.

Hering said in a press conference afterward that he believes both Google and Apple are on top of policing their app stores, particularly when there are known malware problems with apps. But it’s unclear what happens when apps behave as the wallpaper apps do, where it’s not clear why they are doing what they are doing. [Update: Google has said it has suspended the wallpaper app while it investigates the matter].

Topics:

,
  • http://twitter.com/Bravo1Bravo Bobby

    I'll stay in my “Walled Garden.” Hahaha…

  • http://twitter.com/basketbrains basketbrains.com

    Did this particular app beat the system that alerts users to permissions the app requires before downloading? Cause, y'know, if a wallpaper app requests your contact info, sms info etc then maybe think about not installing it?

  • Sofisticated

    The warnings exist for a reason. Watch Apple fault just once and their walled garden come crumbling. This was just a case of users not reading the warnings given to them. Problem exists between display and opposite ear.

  • http://twitter.com/pstrip Intuitit Power Strip

    I cannot find permissions about SMS, contacts or browsing history when trying to install a jackeey wallpaper app with android installer, where all permissions an app ask for will be. If they could still get private info without those permissions, that's a bigger problem. Not just a problem of Android Market, but a problem of the Android OS

  • http://twitter.com/henniman Hendrik Alschner

    This is exactly what was expected to happen. 'Open' systems are NOT adequate for Personal Information Managers like Smartphones. On a real computer you have varying places for your secret data, numerous different email, twitter, addressbook, wallet etc. programs, very hard to spy them out. Plus they are protected by firewalls, malware scanners, encryption. There – open systems make sense.1) On a smartphone PIM those places are standardized, there's no room and processing power for security scanners and firewalls. 2) Typical users also wouldn't be capable to configure them properly3) Security software cannot be placed underneath those hundreds of thousands of installable appsThough, 'open' systems are NOT ADEQUATE for small PIM devices! Thats why Apples closed system is the preferred one here. I feel very secure with my iPhone. It really contains all my data super condensed: docs, addresses, TANs, passwords, mails. Just the imagination of having that laid out to an Android system freezes me. Open systems are a bad choice for such intimate devices.Expect more to come, this was just a wallpaper app. There will be other apps which pretend to be data managers for mails, passwords, documents and which will host trojan code. This does not even require an evil developer, it just needs a dev incorporating a private API/framework which contains the malware code – and the Android users will confirm all warning questions on installation. The 'community' will not be able to discover this, how can they ?! And just as for Windows, the open system and the sheer mass of Android devices makes the platform interesting for the malware coders. Android is the new Windows.I'm glad to have chosen Apple!

  • MikeHuntHughJass

    And just like the “old Windows,” it will also become the dominant platform over Apple, since Apple has once again gone with giving users less choice. Please don't delude yourself into thinking it's a magnanimous effort by Chairman Jobs to protect his sycophantic fans. He is doing this solely to protect Apple's profits by locking users into the App Store and Apple devices. Processing power and battery technology will only increase, allowing for the use of virus scanners etc in phones. Already, there are apps which do this on Android. Also, in case you didn't read the article closely, it said this happens in many iOS apps as well–but that the App Store doesn't notify you during installation that apps want to access your information, which Android does. As with all things, caveat emptor. If the buyer/user isn't conscientious enough to protect themselves and take the warnings that Android provides them with seriously, then they might get burned. Just as they would if they didn't install security software on their PC and went to sites that tend to contain malware (pr0n and warez sites).

  • rattyuk

    Hmmmm. An Android issue and yet you say don't buy Apple. “Processing power and battery technology will only increase, allowing for the use of virus scanners etc in phones.”Yay, yet more “pay us to keep up to date or your data gets it” parasites. I thought that holding your computer to ransom was a thing of the past, actually it is. NOW we're going to hold your phone to ransom and if you don't pay up our App will start charging you big time. “As with all things, caveat emptor.”Indeed but I thought we'd got past that. You might be clever enough to handle such decisions, but is you ma, your grandma? This shouldn't happen if you are trying to own a phone. You shouldn't have to have a degree in computer security to be able to make phone calls. This ball is firmly in the OS developers court and the manufacturers. We've had 25 years of desktop experience here to go on and what have they learned? Nothing.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DQTDFUJDTCPNBCTOOYWS2J4AEA Hendrik

    > If the buyer/user isn't conscientious enough to protect themselves…That's the point: he isn't and will never be. How can the normal smartphone user be smarter than an evil hacker ?> He (Jobs) is doing this solely to protect Apple's profits by locking users into the App StoreNo doubt about it. The Apple closed system costs Apple a lot of efforts + money to maintain but also ensures high user loyalty and superb profit margins. Say, the Apple closed system is a win-win: for Apple and for the user. In contrary: Android is a non win for both: Google doesn't earn money with it and the user misses a gate keeper who assures clean apps.What smartphones may be in some years, if capable of running protection software or not, is of no interest today. First, I doubt that significant memory & speed increases will be available soon. For technologic + cost reasons I doubt that.2nd, malware code will not be easily detectable in many situations.3rd, it's just a huge waste of resources in a system which is critical for realtime use cases.And 4th, scanners and blockers need updates and configuration, just not adequate for smartphone users which are, far more than PC users, no tech guys.Face it: On smartphones, evil code just should never even be INSTALLED. If a bad app is available on the market, it's too late. The Apple gatekeeper model is also not 100% error proof but it's still far better. Besides, I hardly see what the missing freedom should be at the Apple App Store. It's packed with apps of all kind and if there are creative and helpful apps written by devs, they will be approved and installable.

  • http://twitter.com/hypno5ive hypno5ive

    Just last week Apple shut down a flashlight app that enabled tethering. Thing will get by but the process to catch these trojans needs to be in place. The smartphone is becoming the primary computer for many and the kind of data we enter and store will increase the likelihood of those wanting to grab whatever they can get.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OITFNOCAQ4DFOSRKQYAXTR5NKU Dave

    O rly, then you must have missed the news just yesterday about the banking app that leaves iPhone users data vulnerable…your not the exception.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BNUWCRZB5UOYEPLO557LJL4C6U Greg

    No, the problem is that EVERY SINGLE APP YOU INSTALL gives the warnings. People become immune to the warning because it shows up so often.

  • MikeHuntHughJass

    Lol, keep drinking the Kool-Aid, guys. The iOS apps are only marginally “safer” than Android ones, and only because they don't allow Devs the same freedom that Android does. For instance, when I used “Sleep Cycle” on my old iPhones (original and 3GS before switching to Android), you had to manually go into settings to set the screen not to time out and to put the phone into Airplane mode. In Android, devs have the ability to set options so that the USER can CHOOSE to do it automatically. You're making a mistake saying that smart phone users are somehow less capable than PC users, since PC users far outnumber smart phone users. There will be dumb smart phone users who are incapable of basic troubleshooting, but they will also be using the phones simply for email and web browsing, and won't be using apps much (I know women who use iPhones like this).Great quote for why I switched and why Android will surpass iOS for smart phones (of course, Apple will continue to claim iPod Touch in their devices even though they are relatively worthless to the economy, with most users being tweens or people too cheap to pay for a data plan):We've seen this movie before. In the 1980s, Apple jumped out to an early lead in personal computers, but then got selfish. Steve Jobs, a notorious control freak, just could not play well with others.Along came Microsoft, with Windows, which was a knockoff of Apple's operating system. Microsoft partnered with everyone and today has 90 percent market share, while Apple's share lingers in the single digits.Today the battlefield is mobile devices, and just as before, Apple jumped out to an early lead. And just as before, Jobs got selfish. He won't support Flash, or any cross-platform tools—because he wants developers locked into his platform, and his App Store, where he collects a 30 percent commission.He's created his own advertising platform, and stacked the deck in his favor by refusing to share user data with other platforms. On that one he'll take a 40 percent slice, thank you very much.He's even censoring content, ruling out material that he deems to be offensive. Not just porn, but anything that's racy or suggestive, or that “ridicules public figures.”What makes this even more insulting is that Jobs tries to dress up his selfishness as a kind of altruism. He says it's all about creating a beautiful experience, that while he may be selling you an intentionally crippled device, he's doing it for your own good.Well, bull. The truth is, this is about Apple wringing every last dime out of its ecosystem and leaving nothing on the table for anyone else.As sick as I am of my iPhone's dropped calls, I'm even more sick of Apple treating us all like a bunch of idiots, stonewalling and bullying and feeding us ridiculous explanations for the shortcomings of its products—expecting us to believe, basically, that its flaws are not flaws, but strengths.Steve Jobs has created his own precious little walled garden. He's looking more and more like Howard Hughes, holed up in his penthouse, making sure he doesn't come in contact with any germs.Now Google is saying, hey, nice garden, have fun sitting in it. By yourself.As Google exec Vic Gundotra said when explaining why Google entered this market: “If we did not act, we faced a draconian future where one man, one company, one carrier would be our future.”

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3FCYTKDZL4B5G4VIIGFISO5GUY Joao Ribeiro

    @MikeHuntHughJassok so apparently you prefer to pay for someone to duck tape your smartphone (virus software) instead of paying for someone to filter the code before you install it… Can't see much of a diference there… But I would still go with the second one at least I dont have to spend much time and battery with it.In the end your always stuck with someone or something controlling your software, in my experience I find that if you want to really be safe you have to give away a lot of control especially in the anti-virus/firewall approach. In windows for example to be really safe you have to block almost everything while in linux/os x I dont find it as annoying and dont have to worry as much.That ups to the end user to choose but if you think that you are getting more freedom just because you are using a “open” platform I believe you are being mislead by your own convictions. As a lot of philosophers said in the past, with freedom comes responsibility. I accept my responsibility but I don't trust that every developer out there does the same and I would't advise you to fully trust me either. You dont know anything about me and some day I might change my convictions.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3FCYTKDZL4B5G4VIIGFISO5GUY Joao Ribeiro

    @MikeHuntHughJassok so apparently you prefer to pay for someone to duck tape your smartphone (virus software) instead of paying for someone to filter the code before you install it… Can't see much of a diference there… But I would still go with the second one at least I dont have to spend much time and battery with it.In the end your always stuck with someone or something controlling your software, in my experience I find that if you want to really be safe you have to give away a lot of control especially in the anti-virus/firewall approach. In windows for example to be really safe you have to block almost everything while in linux/os x I dont find it as annoying and dont have to worry as much.That ups to the end user to choose but if you think that you are getting more freedom just because you are using a “open” platform I believe you are being mislead by your own convictions. As a lot of philosophers said in the past, with freedom comes responsibility. I accept my responsibility but I don't trust that every developer out there does the same and I would't advise you to fully trust me either. You dont know anything about me and some day I might change my convictions.

  • http://twitter.com/SolidGoldRobot Jay Potts

    The closed system isn't win-win… if it were, then Apple's closed system in the 80's would have bested the PC.But that's not what happened. The PC crushed the Mac, due almost exclusively to their more open platform.

  • http://twitter.com/SolidGoldRobot Jay Potts

    The closed system isn't win-win… if it were, then Apple's closed system in the 80's would have bested the PC.But that's not what happened. The PC crushed the Mac, due almost exclusively to their more open platform.

  • http://www.megadeth.com/ Kartik Thapar

    That was a hole in the App. CitiBank is responsible for that. Go read the news.Also, shutup.

  • http://jaywilmont.livejournal.com/ JayWilmont

    What happened in the computer market is one of only a few examples where an “open” platform won. Look at MP3 players – Apple trounced the PlaysForSure platform. There are plenty of markets, such as gaming consoles and cars, where there is no “open” platform.(Btw, I put the “open” in quotes since I only consider something open source to be a truly open platform)

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DQTDFUJDTCPNBCTOOYWS2J4AEA Hendrik

    As I mentioned at the start: Open systems were best for PCs, workstations. Put in any hard- and software and tailor the machine as you need.Smartphones are different. User requirements differ much less, although there may be millions of apps. An 'open' system is of far less worth here. The only striking argument against a closed system may be that some innovative apps may not be approved. But thats not the case with Apple. Anything that can be done with the hardware is available in the App Store.Far more important for Smartphones:1) Clear and consistent User Interface (learning curve),2) long lasting battery,3) rich apps availability4) security,5) long product cycle (as all these toys allways are expensive)All these points go to Apple iPhone ! One vendor = one concept1) UI: The system UI cannot be modified. No vendors putting in their own UI extensions (as HTC does on Android)2) battery: principle of minimalism rules ! Android just wants to boast with specs, allowing uncontrolled multitasking + Flash. User has no control, what processes do in background3) apps availability: one screen, one UI, same sensors, components: devs love that. Also commercial apps first arrive on iPhones: TV stations, banks, etc. Also publishers and Ad designers love it to know how their content is being presented. 4) security: see above. Bad code has less chances on iPhone. I feel much more safe than I would with dubious Android apps.5) long product cycle: The #1 Android phone from march is already a forgotten one while 2y old iPhones still get OS updates and run all apps. Not only good for consumers, also developers love that.I just see ONE reason for an 'open' smartphone: Evil coders can run any junk on your device. Stealing, changing, deleting data. Spam you with poor content. The only freedom on an 'open' smartphone is the freedom to run crappy junk software.

  • http://mdm-adph.blogspot.com/ mdm-adph

    You're not any safer. As we've seen from the “Flashlight app that really does tethering” debacle, Apple doesn't really check the code that goes into iPhone apps all that much. The only reason why they found out about that one was that it was widely revealed — a cracker isn't going to tell what their secret code is doing.There's probably countless apps like this on the iPhone, what with it being the “largest smartphone ecosystem” and all… ;)

  • http://twitter.com/FindAndroidApps Best Android Apps

    Thanks Dean. I'm going to get this article linked from all my Android blogs and Twitter. I'm lucky- never downloaded this app- of all the Android apps out there, the wallpaper ones are my weak point! Lucky for me I guess. Either way, everyone should know about this ASAP… Like many others are saying: it's not extremely shocking and I expect many more of these type articles in the future. Everyone needs to be careful and understand what they're getting themselves into.Thanks again!

  • rattyuk

    “The only freedom on an 'open' smartphone is the freedom to run crappy junk software.”Nope, you are forgetting the ability of a company that is using it's monopoly in search to attempt to destroy a market that it's competitor (and whose CEO was actually a board member of said competitor) created. But hey.

  • ersouza

    This article is irresponsibly labeling this theft when nothing has been corroborated on that front. Lookout, the research firm, simply called the app “questionable”. There's no indication that the app is somehow grabbing more information than its permissions (granted by the user) allow. No one has determined what info is being sent to the Chinese server and no one has contacted the developer yet.

  • http://twitter.com/cyanidesandwich Jeff Workman

    Keep on drinking that Apple Kool-Aid, kiddo.Open systems are the way of the future. Security through obscurity is very, very rarely a Good Idea.

  • http://twitter.com/SolidGoldRobot Jay Potts

    No, smartphones aren't MP3 players. That's exactly what made the iPhone the massive success it was. It took the smartphone, and made it into a mini-PC (or a mini-Mac). That's where the smartphone is now.The software library is what will determine success in this market moving forward.Your assertion that Apple doesn't stifle innovation on their app store is demonstrably untrue. Apple has rejected numerous apps for various reasons… such as competing with Apple's own products, or presenting ideas that Apple doesn't like, or simply rejected without ANY explanation.This will, ultimately, harm Apple's development community, which will eventually harm the platform.

blog comments powered by Disqus